IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i2p253-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A root location-based framework for degradation modeling of dynamic systems with predictive maintenance perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Langeron
  • Khac Tuan Huynh
  • Antoine Grall

Abstract

This paper considers dynamic systems widely used in industry for which the behavior can be approximated to a second order differential equation. The components of such a system suffer from random faults and failures due to wear, age or usage. These events impact the dynamic behavior which is interpreted as a modification of the initial differential equation with random coefficients. At given times, the system is solicited and its output – the only source of information – is measured to infer the position of equation roots in the complex plane. The Euclidian distance between the current and initial positions of a root is proposed as a new indicator reflecting the gradual deterioration of system performance. Such an indicator presents stochastic trajectories in time according to the random evolution of the root location in complex plane. More especially, these trajectories can be modeled by an univariate non-linear diffusion process if underlying degradation sources are assumed to be homogeneous Gamma processes. Based on this model, the system remaining useful lifetime is assessed. Two predictive maintenance policies are also designed showing the feasibility to easily maintain dynamic systems solely on the system output.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Langeron & Khac Tuan Huynh & Antoine Grall, 2021. "A root location-based framework for degradation modeling of dynamic systems with predictive maintenance perspective," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 253-267, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:2:p:253-267
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20948670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20948670
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20948670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danh Ngoc Nguyen & Laurence Dieulle & Antoine Grall, 2015. "Remaining Useful Lifetime Prognosis of Controlled Systems: A Case of Stochastically Deteriorating Actuator," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-16, June.
    2. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    3. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    4. Langeron, Y. & Grall, A. & Barros, A., 2015. "A modeling framework for deteriorating control system and predictive maintenance of actuators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 22-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Chiachío, Juan & Jalón, María L. & Chiachío, Manuel & Kolios, Athanasios, 2020. "A Markov chains prognostics framework for complex degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Ji Hwan Cha & Sophie Mercier, 2022. "Two Reliability Acceptance Sampling Plans for Items Subject to Wiener Process of Degradation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1651-1668, September.
    5. Song, Kai & Cui, Lirong, 2022. "A common random effect induced bivariate gamma degradation process with application to remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning for predictive aircraft maintenance using probabilistic Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Truong-Ba, Huy & Cholette, Michael E. & Rebello, Sinda & Kent, Geoff, 2024. "Joint planning of inspection, replacement, and component decommissioning for a series system with non-identically degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Chatenet, Q. & Remy, E. & Gagnon, M. & Fouladirad, M. & Tahan, A.S., 2021. "Modeling cavitation erosion using non-homogeneous gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Zhang, Nan & Deng, Yingjun & Liu, Bin & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance for a multi-component system in a dynamic operating environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Kamariotis, Antonios & Tatsis, Konstantinos & Chatzi, Eleni & Goebel, Kai & Straub, Daniel, 2024. "A metric for assessing and optimizing data-driven prognostic algorithms for predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Hachem, Hassan & Vu, Hai Canh & Fouladirad, Mitra, 2024. "Different methods for RUL prediction considering sensor degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Lin, Chun Pang & Ling, Man Ho & Cabrera, Javier & Yang, Fangfang & Yu, Denis Yau Wai & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2021. "Prognostics for lithium-ion batteries using a two-phase gamma degradation process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Dong, Qinglai & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-212.
    16. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Liu, Xingheng & Vatn, Jørn, 2023. "Maintenance optimization of a system subject to two-stage degradation, hard failure, and imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Giovanni Rinaldi & Philipp R. Thies & Lars Johanning, 2021. "Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Brenière, Léa & Doyen, Laurent & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2023. "Optimization of preventive replacements dates and covariate inspections for repairable systems in varying environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1126-1141.
    19. Khac Tuan Huynh & Antoine Grall, 2020. "A condition-based maintenance model with past-dependent imperfect preventive repairs for continuously deteriorating systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 333-358, April.
    20. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:2:p:253-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.