IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i2p121-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adequacy and security analysis of interdependent electric and gas networks

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Antenucci
  • Giovanni Sansavini

Abstract

In this article, adequacy and security assessments on the coupled operations of the electric and gas networks are performed. Extreme operating conditions and fault of components are considered as events that can impact the interdependent systems. The electric and gas networks are represented by an event-based direct current power flow model and by a transient one-dimensional mass flow model, respectively. Furthermore, the automations and safety strategies enforced by transmission system operators are represented within an original modelling approach. A quantitative analysis is performed with reference to the simplified energy infrastructures of Great Britain. Results highlight the contingencies which can jeopardize security and identify the components that are prone to fail and induce large gas pressure instabilities and loss of supply, and the locations in the gas grid that are susceptible to pressure violation. Moreover, a simulated 30% increase of the peak gas demand in 2015 is a limit for safe operations of the gas network, but the coupled systems are robust enough to avoid the spread of a cascading failure across networks. These results allow preventing critical operating conditions induced by the interaction between networks and can guide safety-based decisions on system reinforcements and the development of mitigating actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Antenucci & Giovanni Sansavini, 2018. "Adequacy and security analysis of interdependent electric and gas networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 121-139, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:2:p:121-139
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17715953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17715953
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17715953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R-C Dai & H Pham & Y Wang & J D McCalley, 2012. "Long-term benefits of online risk-based direct-current optimal power flow," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(1), pages 65-74, February.
    2. Popescu, Cristian-Aurelian & Simion, Cristina Petronela, 2012. "A method for defining critical infrastructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 32-34.
    3. Chertkov, Michael & Backhaus, Scott & Lebedev, Vladimir, 2015. "Cascading of fluctuations in interdependent energy infrastructures: Gas-grid coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 541-551.
    4. Chaudry, Modassar & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2013. "A sequential Monte Carlo model of the combined GB gas and electricity network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 473-483.
    5. Eser, Patrick & Singh, Antriksh & Chokani, Ndaona & Abhari, Reza S., 2016. "Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 723-732.
    6. Qadrdan, Meysam & Chaudry, Modassar & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick & Ekanayake, Janaka, 2010. "Impact of a large penetration of wind generation on the GB gas network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5684-5695, October.
    7. Sansavini, G. & Piccinelli, R. & Golea, L.R. & Zio, E., 2014. "A stochastic framework for uncertainty analysis in electric power transmission systems with wind generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 71-81.
    8. Saldarriaga-C., Carlos A. & Salazar, Harold, 2016. "Security of the Colombian energy supply: The need for liquefied natural gas regasification terminals for power and natural gas sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 349-362.
    9. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    10. Sheikhi, Aras & Bahrami, Shahab & Ranjbar, Ali Mohammad, 2015. "An autonomous demand response program for electricity and natural gas networks in smart energy hubs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 490-499.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesus Beyza & Eduardo Garcia-Paricio & Jose M. Yusta, 2019. "Applying Complex Network Theory to the Vulnerability Assessment of Interdependent Energy Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antenucci, Andrea & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Extensive CO2 recycling in power systems via Power-to-Gas and network storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 33-43.
    2. Hosseini, Seyed Hamid Reza & Allahham, Adib & Walker, Sara Louise & Taylor, Phil, 2020. "Optimal planning and operation of multi-vector energy networks: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    4. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    5. Devlin, Joseph & Li, Kang & Higgins, Paraic & Foley, Aoife, 2016. "The importance of gas infrastructure in power systems with high wind power penetrations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 294-304.
    6. Su, Huai & Zhang, Jinjun & Zio, Enrico & Yang, Nan & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Zongjie, 2018. "An integrated systemic method for supply reliability assessment of natural gas pipeline networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 489-501.
    7. Devlin, Joseph & Li, Kang & Higgins, Paraic & Foley, Aoife, 2017. "Gas generation and wind power: A review of unlikely allies in the United Kingdom and Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 757-768.
    8. Guerra, Omar J. & Tejada, Diego A. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2019. "Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies for a hydro-dominated power system via stochastic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 584-598.
    9. Chi, Lixun & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Qadrdan, Meysam & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Li & Fan, Lin & Zhou, Jing & Yang, Zhaoming & Zhang, Jinjun, 2021. "Data-driven reliability assessment method of Integrated Energy Systems based on probabilistic deep learning and Gaussian mixture Model-Hidden Markov Model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 952-970.
    10. Senderov, S.M. & Vorobev, S.V., 2020. "Approaches to the identification of critical facilities and critical combinations of facilities in the gas industry in terms of its operability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Corrado lo Storto, 2019. "An SNA-DEA Prioritization Framework to Identify Critical Nodes of Gas Networks: The Case of the US Interstate Gas Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Jiang, Tao & Zhang, Rufeng & Li, Xue & Chen, Houhe & Li, Guoqing, 2021. "Integrated energy system security region: Concepts, methods, and implementations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Cabrales, Sergio & Valencia, Carlos & Ramírez, Carlos & Ramírez, Andrés & Herrera, Juan & Cadena, Angela, 2022. "Stochastic cost-benefit analysis to assess new infrastructure to improve the reliability of the natural gas supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Daniel Scamman & Baltazar Solano-Rodríguez & Steve Pye & Lai Fong Chiu & Andrew Z. P. Smith & Tiziano Gallo Cassarino & Mark Barrett & Robert Lowe, 2020. "Heat Decarbonisation Modelling Approaches in the UK: An Energy System Architecture Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Jose R. Vargas-Jaramillo & Jhon A. Montanez-Barrera & Michael R. von Spakovsky & Lamine Mili & Sergio Cano-Andrade, 2019. "Effects of Producer and Transmission Reliability on the Sustainability Assessment of Power System Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Power-to-gas for injection into the gas grid: What can we learn from real-life projects, economic assessments and systems modelling?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 302-316.
    17. van Stiphout, Arne & Virag, Ana & Kessels, Kris & Deconinck, Geert, 2018. "Benefits of a multi-energy day-ahead market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 651-661.
    18. Wang, Jianxiao & Zhong, Haiwang & Ma, Ziming & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2017. "Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 772-782.
    19. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Yang, Jiale & Ma, Yuze & Yu, Haiyang & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Fuwei & Zhang, Yanfu, 2019. "Operation optimization of regional integrated energy system based on the modeling of electricity-thermal-natural gas network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:2:p:121-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.