IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v227y2013i3p227-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interplay between deployment and optimal maintenance intervals for complex multi-component systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tiedo Tinga
  • Rene Janssen

Abstract

Instead of performing maintenance at fixed intervals, the operational efficiency of assets can be improved significantly by taking into account the variations in usage and operating environment of the asset. In that way, the traditional static maintenance policy is replaced by a dynamic maintenance policy. In the present work, this concept is demonstrated by modeling the failure behavior of a rather complex multi-component system, i.e. a navy frigate. For this system, several non-identical subsystems are included. Some of the systems are unique on board, while others have been made redundant, which means that the criticality of the subsystems to the mission capability of the frigate varies. Moreover, the variation in deployment of the frigate in terms of mission types and operating environments is translated into various usage profiles for the subsystems. Simulations are then performed to obtain the optimal maintenance policy in terms of interval length and preventive maintenance threshold, given certain requirements for the deployability of the frigate in a certain period. Moreover, the sensitivity of the results for different subsystem initial service life times and variations in usage profile are investigated. The results show a clear dependence of the optimal interval on the mission program of the frigate and the subsystem failure behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiedo Tinga & Rene Janssen, 2013. "The interplay between deployment and optimal maintenance intervals for complex multi-component systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(3), pages 227-240, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:3:p:227-240
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13480743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13480743
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13480743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine & Dieulle, Laurence, 2008. "On the use of on-line detection for maintenance of gradually deteriorating systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(12), pages 1814-1820.
    2. Tinga, Tiedo, 2010. "Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1061-1075.
    3. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    4. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    5. Chew, S.P. & Dunnett, S.J. & Andrews, J.D., 2008. "Phased mission modelling of systems with maintenance-free operating periods using simulated Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 980-994.
    6. Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. Tinga, Tiedo, 2010. "Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1061-1075.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    4. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    5. Ayse Sena Eruguz & Tarkan Tan & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Optimizing usage and maintenance decisions for k‐out‐of‐n systems of moving assets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 418-434, August.
    6. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    7. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    8. Tamilselvan, Prasanna & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 124-135.
    9. Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2011. "Condition-based maintenance for a system subject to a non-homogeneous wear process with a wear rate transition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 611-618.
    10. Poppe, Joeri & Basten, Rob J.I. & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2017. "Numerical study of inventory management under various maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 262-273.
    11. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2017. "Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 209-222.
    12. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    13. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    14. Xi, Zhimin & Jing, Rong & Wang, Pingfeng & Hu, Chao, 2014. "A copula-based sampling method for data-driven prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 72-82.
    15. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Shemehsavar, S. & Grall, A., 2024. "An intelligent maintenance policy for a latent degradation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Wang, Xiaolin & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Guo, Bo, 2014. "Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-23.
    18. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    20. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:3:p:227-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.