IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v225y2011i3p333-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collision avoidance systems in air and maritime traffic

Author

Listed:
  • M Baldauf
  • K Benedict
  • S Fischer
  • F Motz
  • J-U Schröder-Hinrichs

Abstract

In each transport mode, collisions between vehicles are one of the major operational risks. In maritime traffic collisions and groundings is the category with the highest frequency of all accidents. Although new navigational equipment, often combined with enhanced computer-based systems, is installed on ships’ bridges, the number of collisions is still at a high level. The equivalent of ship collisions in air traffic is the mid-air collision. Compared to the maritime accident rate, mid-air collisions are very rare. In this paper we investigate the onboard collision avoidance process by focusing on technical support systems with implemented alerts to support the human operator. Empirical field studies have been undertaken to analyse the situation regarding the occurrence and handling of alerts onboard seagoing vessels. Especially with respect to collision avoidance alarms, the situation was found to be unsatisfactory. The algorithms in use are based on fixed static limit values and little selected information is used although new systems provide more and enhanced situation-specific data. A comparative study of the traffic-alert and collision avoidance system used by air traffic is made to identify potentials for synergies to improve maritime operational risk management. As an innovative approach, the development of a concept to adapt alarm thresholds automatically by using enhanced fast-time simulation techniques is introduced and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • M Baldauf & K Benedict & S Fischer & F Motz & J-U Schröder-Hinrichs, 2011. "Collision avoidance systems in air and maritime traffic," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(3), pages 333-343, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:3:p:333-343
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X11408973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X11408973
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X11408973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Netjasov, Fedja & Janic, Milan, 2008. "A review of research on risk and safety modelling in civil aviation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 213-220.
    2. Montewka, Jakub & Hinz, Tomasz & Kujala, Pentti & Matusiak, Jerzy, 2010. "Probability modelling of vessel collisions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 573-589.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naybour, Matthew & Remenyte-Prescott, Rasa & Boyd, Matthew J., 2019. "Reliability and efficiency evaluation of a community pharmacy dispensing process using a coloured Petri-net approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 258-268.
    2. Sotiralis, P. & Ventikos, N.P. & Hamann, R. & Golyshev, P. & Teixeira, A.P., 2016. "Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focusing on human centred design aspects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 210-227.
    3. Rahim A. Ganiyu, 2016. "Perceived Service Quality and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Passenger Satisfaction in the Nigerian Airline Industry," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 52(1), pages 94-117, December.
    4. Ghoneim, Ayman & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "A multiobjective distance separation methodology to determine sector-level minimum separation for safe air traffic scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 226-240.
    5. Goerlandt, Floris & Montewka, Jakub, 2015. "Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 115-134.
    6. Rong, H. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Maritime traffic probabilistic prediction based on ship motion pattern extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Szlapczynski, Rafal & Szlapczynska, Joanna, 2021. "A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and Collision Alert Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    9. Ivano Bongiovanni & Cameron Newton, 2019. "Toward an Epidemiology of Safety and Security Risks: An Organizational Vulnerability Assessment in International Airports," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1281-1297, June.
    10. Abreu, Danilo T.M.P. & Maturana, Marcos C. & Droguett, Enrique Lopez & Martins, Marcelo R., 2022. "Human reliability analysis of conventional maritime pilotage operations supported by a prospective model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Pacheco, Ricardo Rodrigues & Fernandes, Elton & Domingos, Eduardo Marques, 2014. "Airport airside safety index," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 86-92.
    12. Bani-Mustafa, Tasneem & Flage, Roger & Vasseur, Dominique & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "An extended method for evaluating assumptions deviations in quantitative risk assessment and its application to external flooding risk assessment of a nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Xin, Xuri & Liu, Kezhong & Loughney, Sean & Wang, Jin & Li, Huanhuan & Ekere, Nduka & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Multi-scale collision risk estimation for maritime traffic in complex port waters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Fox, Sarah, 2014. "Safety and security: The influence of 9/11 to the EU framework for air carriers and aircraft operators," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-33.
    15. Dinis, D. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "Probabilistic approach for characterising the static risk of ships using Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Gino J. Lim & Jaeyoung Cho & Selim Bora & Taofeek Biobaku & Hamid Parsaei, 2018. "Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 765-786, December.
    17. Monika Blišťanová & Michaela Tirpáková & Jozef Galanda, 2022. "Proposal of Risk Identification Methodology Using the Prompt List on the Example of an Air Carrier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Zhang, Mingyang & Montewka, Jakub & Manderbacka, Teemu & Kujala, Pentti & Hirdaris, Spyros, 2021. "A Big Data Analytics Method for the Evaluation of Ship - Ship Collision Risk reflecting Hydrometeorological Conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Murray, Brian & Perera, Lokukaluge Prasad, 2021. "An AIS-based deep learning framework for regional ship behavior prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Yue Jiao & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Yui-yip Lau, 2020. "Cruise Ship Safety Management in Asian Regions: Trends and Future Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:3:p:333-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.