IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v224y2010i1p55-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended opportunity-based age replacement with a one-cycle criterion

Author

Listed:
  • D Venkat
  • F P A Coolen
  • P Coolen-Schrijner

Abstract

Age replacement is a well-established theoretical model for guidance on preventive replacement of technical units, with the intention to replace units before failure, in a manner that is most cost-effective. Traditionally, the cost criterion is based on assumed use of the same replacement strategy over a period of infinite length, enabling application of the renewal reward theorem to derive the units’ optimal preventive replacement age. However, in many situations the number of renewals involving exchangeable units is typically small, which undermines the use of this traditional cost criterion. As an alternative, minimal average costs per unit time over a single cycle has been proposed, and studied for several age replacement scenarios. In this paper, this work is briefly reviewed, followed by presentation of results on the use of the one-cycle criterion for extended opportunity-based age replacement. In this model, a unit is replaced correctively in case of failure or preventively upon reaching a specific age, as in the standard age replacement model. In addition, the unit is replaced preventively if opportunities occur during a period before the optimal age replacement time, for example in case production stops due to failure or preventive replacement of other units in the same production process. As such, costs of preventive replacement in the latter case are likely to be smaller than if preventive replacement of the specific unit requires a production stop, making it clear that it will be attractive to benefit from such opportunities occurring within a certain time range prior to scheduled preventive replacement. Optimality results for this model, with the one-cycle criterion, are presented and illustrated, and it is shown how limiting cases coincide with several other age replacement scenarios. Iskandar and Sandoh (An extended opportunity-based age replacement policy. RAIRO Ops Res., 2000, 34 , 145—154) studied this model with the renewal reward criterion, but they assumed that all preventive replacements would incur the same costs. A generalization of their results is presented, allowing different costs for the two preventive replacement scenarios. This enables the comparison of the optimal replacement strategies according to the one-cycle criterion and the renewal reward criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • D Venkat & F P A Coolen & P Coolen-Schrijner, 2010. "Extended opportunity-based age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(1), pages 55-62, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:224:y:2010:i:1:p:55-62
    DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/1748006XJRR275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1243/1748006XJRR275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coolen-Schrijner, P. & Coolen, F.P.A., 2007. "Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 74-84.
    2. P Coolen-Schrijner & F P A Coolen, 2004. "Adaptive age replacement strategies based on nonparametric predictive inference," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1281-1297, December.
    3. Cleroux, R. & Hanscom, M., 1974. "Age replacement with adjustment and depreciation costs and interest charges," LIDAM Reprints CORE 170, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Rommert Dekker & Matthijs C. Dijkstra, 1992. "Opportunity‐based age replacement: Exponentially distributed times between opportunities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 175-190, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2017. "A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 70-79.
    2. Hamidi, Maryam & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Szidarovszky, Miklos, 2016. "New one cycle criteria for optimizing preventive replacement policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 42-48.
    3. Truong Ba, H. & Cholette, M.E. & Borghesani, P. & Zhou, Y. & Ma, L., 2017. "Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 151-161.
    4. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Uan-Yu & Zhang, Zhe George, 2019. "Optimal replacement policies for a system based on a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Junjun & Okamura, Hiroyuki & Dohi, Tadashi, 2021. "Age replacement with Markovian opportunity process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. P Coolen-Schrijner & F. P. A. Coolen, 2006. "On Optimality Criteria for Age Replacement," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 220(1), pages 21-29, June.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    4. Jiang, R., 2018. "Performance evaluation of seven optimization models of age replacement policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 302-311.
    5. Dursun, İpek & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2022. "Age-based maintenance under population heterogeneity: Optimal exploration and exploitation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1007-1020.
    6. Hamidi, Maryam & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Szidarovszky, Miklos, 2016. "New one cycle criteria for optimizing preventive replacement policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 42-48.
    7. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Uan-Yu & Zhang, Zhe George, 2019. "Optimal replacement policies for a system based on a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Zhao, Xufeng & Al-Khalifa, Khalifa N. & Magid Hamouda, Abdel & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2017. "Age replacement models: A summary with new perspectives and methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 95-105.
    9. P Coolen-Schrijner & S C Shaw & F P A Coolen, 2009. "Opportunity-based age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1428-1438, October.
    10. Wu, Jing & Qian, Cunhua & Dohi, Tadashi, 2024. "Optimal opportunity-based age replacement policies in discrete time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Truong Ba, H. & Cholette, M.E. & Borghesani, P. & Zhou, Y. & Ma, L., 2017. "Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 151-161.
    12. Jing Wu & Cunhua Qian & Tadashi Dohi, 2024. "A Net Present Value Analysis of Opportunity-Based Age Replacement Models in Discrete Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    14. Coolen-Schrijner, P. & Coolen, F.P.A., 2007. "Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 74-84.
    15. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    16. T F Lipi & J-H Lim & M J Zuo & W Wang, 2012. "A condition- and age-based replacement model using delay time modelling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(2), pages 221-233, April.
    17. P Coolen-Schrijner & F P A Coolen & I M MacPhee, 2008. "Nonparametric predictive inference for system reliability with redundancy allocation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 463-476, December.
    18. P Coolen-Schrijner & F P A Coolen & S C Shaw, 2006. "Nonparametric adaptive opportunity-based age replacement strategies," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 63-81, January.
    19. I M MacPhee & F P A Coolen & A M Aboalkhair, 2009. "Nonparametric predictive system reliability with redundancy allocation following component testing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(3), pages 181-188, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:224:y:2010:i:1:p:55-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.