IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v3y1991i3p365-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acting together, Contributing together

Author

Listed:
  • RUSSELL HARDIN

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

Collective action typically takes one of two strategically distinct forms. One form is essentially acting together, as in a mob, in coordination on some purpose, which may not be defined in detail or readily changed. The other is contributing together in cooperation or exchange to generate resources that then may be used for collective purposes (although they may also be misused). Historically, much of the most important collective action was acting together; much of recent reformist politics in Western nations has been based in contributing together. There seem also to be distinctive differences across groups, especially across economic classes, in the forms of collective action they adopt. Most obviously, acting together is the resort of those, such as the poor and the young, who lack resources for contributing together. The rise of contributing together has accompanied the rise of a large and prosperous middle class.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell Hardin, 1991. "Acting together, Contributing together," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(3), pages 365-380, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:3:y:1991:i:3:p:365-380
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463191003003007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463191003003007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463191003003007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas E. Booth, 1978. "Collective Action, Marx’s Class Theory, and the Union Movement," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 163-185, March.
    2. John E. Roemer, 1979. "Mass Action Is Not Individually Rational: Reply," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 763-767, September.
    3. Adam Przeworski, 1980. "Material Interests, Class Compromise, and the Transition to Socialism," Politics & Society, , vol. 10(2), pages 125-153, March.
    4. Aristide R. Zolberg, 1972. "Moments of Madness," Politics & Society, , vol. 2(2), pages 183-207, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trudi C. Miller, 1992. "The Implications of Self-Interest," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(4), pages 395-412, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rucht, Dieter, 2016. "Neuere kapitalismuskritische und antikapitalistische Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 121-134.
    2. Robert E. Goodin, 2017. "The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 351-366, September.
    3. Fabien Tarrit, 2012. "Marxisme analytique et classes sociales," Post-Print hal-02019776, HAL.
    4. Martin Neumann, 2012. "Modelling the Dynamics of Securizitating National Identities," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 10(1), pages 28-49.
    5. Rucht, Dieter, 1994. "Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen: Deutschland, Frankreich und USA im Vergleich," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 32, number 122892, December.
    6. Robert M. Fishman, 2011. "Democratic Practice after the Revolution: The Case of Portugal and Beyond," Politics & Society, , vol. 39(2), pages 233-267, June.
    7. Korkut Alp Erturk, 2019. "Class Agency Under Conditions of Self-Enforcement: Marx on Capitalists' Common's Problem," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2019_01, University of Utah, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:3:y:1991:i:3:p:365-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.