IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v50y2017i3d10.1007_s11077-017-9286-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Goodin

    (Australian National University)

Abstract

One instrumental defense of democracy is epistemic in character: Insofar as there is a correct answer to be found to some question being politically addressed, democratic decision-making procedures are more likely to find it than any other. But that assumes that the correct answer appears on the agenda in the first place, and that the agenda is not so cluttered that it gets lost there. Two-stage deliberative procedures can help with both problems, first by populating the agenda and then by winnowing it. A good example of both occurring is found in the detailed records now available of top secret ExComm deliberations surrounding the US government’s response to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Goodin, 2017. "The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 351-366, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:50:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-017-9286-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-017-9286-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-017-9286-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-017-9286-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aristide R. Zolberg, 1972. "Moments of Madness," Politics & Society, , vol. 2(2), pages 183-207, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bing Wang & Longmei Xia & Alfred M. Wu, 2022. "Social Development with Public Value: An International Comparison," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 909-934, July.
    2. Feng-Shang Wu & Hong-Ji Huang, 2024. "Why Do Some Countries Innovate Better than Others? A New Perspective of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Regimes and National Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rucht, Dieter, 2016. "Neuere kapitalismuskritische und antikapitalistische Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 121-134.
    2. Russell Hardin, 1991. "Acting together, Contributing together," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(3), pages 365-380, July.
    3. Martin Neumann, 2012. "Modelling the Dynamics of Securizitating National Identities," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 10(1), pages 28-49.
    4. Robert M. Fishman, 2011. "Democratic Practice after the Revolution: The Case of Portugal and Beyond," Politics & Society, , vol. 39(2), pages 233-267, June.
    5. Rucht, Dieter, 1994. "Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen: Deutschland, Frankreich und USA im Vergleich," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 32, number 122892, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:50:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-017-9286-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.