IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v36y2008i1p89-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bringing Public Opinion and Electoral Politics Back In: Explaining the Fate of “Clintonomics†and Its Contemporary Relevance

Author

Listed:
  • James Shoch

    (California State University—Sacramento, shochj@csus.edu)

Abstract

In 1992, Bill Clinton won the presidency committed to an ambitious program of “public investment.†Yet the plan Clinton submitted to the Democrat-controlled Congress in early 1993 was sharply scaled back in favor of an emphasis on reducing the federal budget deficit. Congress then made further deep cuts in Clinton's plan. This Democratic retreat from public investment would continue throughout the remainder of Clinton's presidency. In this article, I argue that the fate of “Clintonomics†was due mainly to public opinion and electoral politics . In an epilogue, I examine the implications of this episode for the new intra-Democratic debate over public investment.

Suggested Citation

  • James Shoch, 2008. "Bringing Public Opinion and Electoral Politics Back In: Explaining the Fate of “Clintonomics†and Its Contemporary Relevance," Politics & Society, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-130, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:36:y:2008:i:1:p:89-130
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329207312177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329207312177
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329207312177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weatherford, M. Stephen, 2002. "After the Critical Election: Presidential Leadership, Competition and the Consolidation of the New Deal Realignment," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 221-257, April.
    2. James K. Galbraith, 2005. "Breaking out of the Deficit Trap: The Case Against the Fiscal Hawks ," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_81, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Stephen Ansolabehere & Jonathan Rodden & James M. Snyder Jr., 2006. "Purple America," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 97-118, Spring.
    4. Prasad, Monica, 2006. "The Politics of Free Markets," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226679013, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Krasa & Mattias Polborn, 2014. "Policy Divergence and Voter Polarization in a Structural Model of Elections," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 31-76.
    2. Elliott, Rebecca, 2024. "The state and the state-of-the-art: prefiguring private insurance for U.S. flood risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Scott R. Baker & Nicholas Bloom & Brandice Canes-Wrone & Steven J. Davis & Jonathan Rodden, 2014. "Why Has US Policy Uncertainty Risen since 1960?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 56-60, May.
    4. Makowsky, Michael D., 2011. "Religion, clubs, and emergent social divides," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 74-87.
    5. Daiki Kishishita & Atsushi Yamagishi, 2022. "Do supermajority rules really deter extremism? the role of electoral competition 1," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 34(1), pages 127-144, January.
    6. Edward L. Glaeser & Bryce A. Ward, 2006. "Myths and Realities of American Political Geography," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 119-144, Spring.
    7. repec:rre:publsh:v:36:y:2006:i:3:p:427-47 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Elena Panova, 2011. "A Passion for Democracy," CIRANO Working Papers 2011s-47, CIRANO.
    9. W. Ben McCartney & John Orellana & Calvin Zhang, 2021. "“Sort Selling”: Political Polarization and Residential Choice," Working Papers 21-14, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    10. Mirko Draca & Carlo Schwarz, 2024. "How Polarised are Citizens? Measuring Ideology from the Ground up," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(661), pages 1950-1984.
    11. Roger Middleton, 2014. "The Great Depression in Europe: Economic Thought and Policy in a National Context," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 529-532, June.
    12. Hilary Botein & C Patrick Heidkamp, 2013. "Tax lien sales as local neoliberal governance strategy: The case of Waterbury, Connecticut," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(5), pages 488-498, August.
    13. Nitsan Chorev, 2013. "Restructuring neoliberalism at the World Health Organization," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 627-666, August.
    14. Martijn Konings, 2016. "The Spirit of Austerity," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 86-100, February.
    15. Thomas Alan, 2020. "Full Employment, Unconditional Basic Income and the Keynesian Critique of Rentier Capitalism," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-38, June.
    16. Linkowski Radosław, 2017. "Electoral behaviour in the Kraków metropolitan area: 1993–2011," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(35), pages 65-80, March.
    17. Benjamin Gross, 2013. "Color-Coding Politics," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(1), pages 21582440134, February.
    18. Pape, Fabian & Petry, Johannes, 2023. "East Asia and the politics of global finance: a developmental challenge to the neoliberal consensus?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118296, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Sarah Babb, 2013. "The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 268-297, April.
    20. Yingying Deng & Monica Prasad, 2009. "Taxation and the Worlds of Welfare," LIS Working papers 480, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    21. Stefan Krasa & Mattias Polborn, 2012. "Elites or Masses? A Structural Model of Policy Divergence, Voter Sorting and Apparent Polarization in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1972-2008," CESifo Working Paper Series 3752, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:36:y:2008:i:1:p:89-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.