IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i1p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extrapolating Parametric Survival Models in Health Technology Assessment: A Simulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Gallacher

    (Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK)

  • Peter Kimani

    (Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK)

  • Nigel Stallard

    (Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK)

Abstract

Extrapolations of parametric survival models fitted to censored data are routinely used in the assessment of health technologies to estimate mean survival, particularly in diseases that potentially reduce the life expectancy of patients. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are commonly used in health technology assessment alongside an assessment of plausibility to determine which statistical model best fits the data and should be used for prediction of long-term treatment effects. We compare fit and estimates of restricted mean survival time (RMST) from 8 parametric models and contrast models preferred in terms of AIC, BIC, and log-likelihood, without considering model plausibility. We assess the methods’ suitability for selecting a parametric model through simulation of data replicating the follow-up of intervention arms for various time-to-event outcomes from 4 clinical trials. Follow-up was replicated through the consideration of recruitment duration and minimum and maximum follow-up times. Ten thousand simulations of each scenario were performed. We demonstrate that the different methods can result in disagreement over the best model and that it is inappropriate to base model selection solely on goodness-of-fit statistics without consideration of hazard behavior and plausibility of extrapolations. We show that typical trial follow-up can be unsuitable for extrapolation, resulting in unreliable estimation of multiple parameter models, and infer that selecting survival models based only on goodness-of-fit statistics is unsuitable due to the high level of uncertainty in a cost-effectiveness analysis. This article demonstrates the potential problems of overreliance on goodness-of-fit statistics when selecting a model for extrapolation. When follow-up is more mature, BIC appears superior to the other selection methods, selecting models with the most accurate and least biased estimates of RMST.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Gallacher & Peter Kimani & Nigel Stallard, 2021. "Extrapolating Parametric Survival Models in Health Technology Assessment: A Simulation Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(1), pages 37-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:1:p:37-50
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20973201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20973201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X20973201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Bell Gorrod & Ben Kearns & John Stevens & Praveen Thokala & Alexander Labeit & Nicholas Latimer & David Tyas & Ahmed Sowdani, 2019. "A Review of Survival Analysis Methods Used in NICE Technology Appraisals of Cancer Treatments: Consistency, Limitations, and Areas for Improvement," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(8), pages 899-909, November.
    2. Adrian Vickers, 2019. "An Evaluation of Survival Curve Extrapolation Techniques Using Long-Term Observational Cancer Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(8), pages 926-938, November.
    3. Jackson, Christopher, 2016. "flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mathyn Vervaart & Mark Strong & Karl P. Claxton & Nicky J. Welton & Torbjørn Wisløff & Eline Aas, 2022. "An Efficient Method for Computing Expected Value of Sample Information for Survival Data from an Ongoing Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(5), pages 612-625, July.
    2. Lin-Yen Wang & Tsair-Wei Chien & Willy Chou, 2021. "Using the IPcase Index with Inflection Points and the Corresponding Case Numbers to Identify the Impact Hit by COVID-19 in China: An Observation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Taihang Shao & Mingye Zhao & Leyi Liang & Lizheng Shi & Wenxi Tang, 2023. "Impact of Extrapolation Model Choices on the Structural Uncertainty in Economic Evaluations for Cancer Immunotherapy: A Case Study of Checkmate 067," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 383-392, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaojing Che & Nathan Green & Gianluca Baio, 2023. "Blended Survival Curves: A New Approach to Extrapolation for Time-to-Event Outcomes from Clinical Trials in Health Technology Assessment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(3), pages 299-310, April.
    2. Elizabeth G Bond & Lusine Abrahamyan & Mohammad K A Khan & Andrea Gershon & Murray Krahn & Ping Li & Rajibul Mian & Nicholas Mitsakakis & Mohsen Sadatsafavi & Teresa To & Petros Pechlivanoglou & for t, 2020. "Understanding resource utilization and mortality in COPD to support policy making: A microsimulation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Sharples, Linda D., 2018. "The role of statistics in the era of big data: Electronic health records for healthcare research," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 105-110.
    4. Suvra Pal & Hongbo Yu & Zachary D. Loucks & Ian M. Harris, 2020. "Illustration of the Flexibility of Generalized Gamma Distribution in Modeling Right Censored Survival Data: Analysis of Two Cancer Datasets," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 77-90, March.
    5. Michael Crowther & Paul Lambert, 2016. "Multistate survival analysis in Stata," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2016 02, Stata Users Group.
    6. I. Oostrum & T. A. Russell-Smith & M. Jakobsson & J. Torup Østby & B. Heeg, 2022. "Cost-Effectiveness of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Compared to Standard of Care Chemotherapy for Treating Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Patients in Norway and Sweden," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 47-62, January.
    7. Daniel Gallacher & Peter Kimani & Nigel Stallard, 2022. "Biased Survival Predictions When Appraising Health Technologies in Heterogeneous Populations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 109-120, January.
    8. Caitlin Eichten & Qiufei Ma & Thomas E. Delea & May Hagiwara & Roberto Ramos & Şerban R. Iorga & Jie Zhang & Richard T. Maziarz, 2021. "Lifetime Costs for Treated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in the US," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(10), pages 1163-1183, October.
    9. Gabrielle Jongeneel & Marjolein J. E. Greuter & Felice N. Erning & Miriam Koopman & Jan P. Medema & Raju Kandimalla & Ajay Goel & Luis Bujanda & Gerrit A. Meijer & Remond J. A. Fijneman & Martijn G. H, 2020. "Modeling Personalized Adjuvant TreaTment in EaRly stage coloN cancer (PATTERN)," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(7), pages 1059-1073, September.
    10. Linh Hoang Khanh Dang & Carlo Giovanni Camarda & France Meslé & Nadine Ouellette & Jean-Marie Robine & Jacques Vallin, 2023. "The question of the human mortality plateau: Contrasting insights by longevity pioneers," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(11), pages 321-338.
    11. María del Mar Rueda & Sergio Martínez-Puertas & Luis Castro-Martín, 2022. "Methods to Counter Self-Selection Bias in Estimations of the Distribution Function and Quantiles," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Raghul Gandhi Venkatesan & Bagavandas Mappillairaju, 2024. "Early student dropout detection in Indian secondary education with special reference to selected districts in Tamil Nadu: a machine learning-based survival analysis approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2309-2331, December.
    13. Camarda, Carlo Giovanni, 2022. "The curse of the plateau. Measuring confidence in human mortality estimates at extreme ages," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 24-36.
    14. Jodi Gray & Thomas Sullivan & Nicholas R. Latimer & Amy Salter & Michael J. Sorich & Robyn L. Ward & Jonathan Karnon, 2021. "Extrapolation of Survival Curves Using Standard Parametric Models and Flexible Parametric Spline Models: Comparisons in Large Registry Cohorts with Advanced Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(2), pages 179-193, February.
    15. Christopher A. Büsch & Marietta Kirchner & Rouven Behnisch & Meinhard Kieser, 2024. "A Comparison of Additional Benefit Assessment Methods for Time-to-Event Endpoints Using Hazard Ratio Point Estimates or Confidence Interval Limits by Means of a Simulation Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(4), pages 365-379, May.
    16. M. A. Chaudhary & M. Edmondson-Jones & G. Baio & E. Mackay & J. R. Penrod & D. J. Sharpe & G. Yates & S. Rafiq & K. Johannesen & M. K. Siddiqui & J. Vanderpuye-Orgle & A. Briggs, 2023. "Use of Advanced Flexible Modeling Approaches for Survival Extrapolation from Early Follow-up Data in two Nivolumab Trials in Advanced NSCLC with Extended Follow-up," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(1), pages 91-109, January.
    17. Carmen María Yago & Francisco Javier Díez, 2023. "DESnets: A Graphical Representation for Discrete Event Simulation and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Philip Cooney & Arthur White, 2023. "Direct Incorporation of Expert Opinion into Parametric Survival Models to Inform Survival Extrapolation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(3), pages 325-336, April.
    19. Nicholas R. Latimer & Mark J. Rutherford, 2024. "Mixture and Non-mixture Cure Models for Health Technology Assessment: What You Need to Know," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(10), pages 1073-1090, October.
    20. Burger, Rulof & Ito, Seiro, 2016. "Labour market turnovers among South African youths," IDE Discussion Papers 603, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:1:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.