IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/mareco/v17y2023i3-4p251-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Protection Paradigm in India: Mounting Criticality of Digitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • C S Mohapatra

    (C S Mohapatra (corresponding author) is the Chair Professor of IEPFA, Ministry of Corporate Affairs at the National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, India. E-mail: csmohapatra@ncaer.org)

  • Depannita Ghosh

    (Depannita Ghosh is the Research Associate in the IEPF Chair Unit at NCAER, New Delhi, India. E-mail: dghosh@ncaer.org)

Abstract

With the advent of digitalisation and expansion of the retail market in recent years, India has experienced a significant shift in its financial landscape, necessitating an increased emphasis on investor education and protection. This article delves into the intricate relationship between investor education and investor protection, emphasising the pivotal role of the government, regulators and financial institutions in framing protective measures for investors. With the rise of digitalisation, particularly fintech, the financial services sector has witnessed transformative changes, influencing access to investment opportunities. This exploratory article reviews the existing architecture for investor protection and stresses the need for a dynamic and well-coordinated approach, robust complaint resolution mechanism, and comprehensive research to enhance investor protection in this evolving financial ecosystem. It discusses notable initiatives, including the National Strategy on Financial Education and its 5C strategy, suggesting an additional ‘6th C’, that is, a class-oriented approach to serve as a key driver in creating a financially aware and empowered India. The strengthening of the regulatory framework with adequate cybersecurity measures, launch of an online portal for claim settlement and the establishment of a Centralised Grievance Redressal system are highlighted as crucial steps in building a comprehensive investor protection framework. The authors also highlight that investor protection is a two-way approach involving the government and regulatory bodies on the one hand and investors on the other, with both sides being equally accountable, alert and watchful in the digital era. JEL Codes: D02, D14, D18, G18, G21, G22, G23, G28

Suggested Citation

  • C S Mohapatra & Depannita Ghosh, 2023. "Investor Protection Paradigm in India: Mounting Criticality of Digitalisation," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 17(3-4), pages 251-278, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:17:y:2023:i:3-4:p:251-278
    DOI: 10.1177/00252921241262674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00252921241262674
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00252921241262674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Acquisti & Curtis Taylor & Liad Wagman, 2016. "The Economics of Privacy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 442-492, June.
    2. Kenneth W. Abbott & David Levi-Faur & Duncan Snidal, 2017. "Introducing Regulatory Intermediaries," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 6-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    2. Jacopo Arpetti & Antonio Iovanella, 2019. "Towards more effective consumer steering via network analysis," Papers 1903.11469, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    3. Ronen Gradwohl, 2018. "Privacy in implementation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(3), pages 547-580, March.
    4. John M. Abowd & Ian M. Schmutte & William Sexton & Lars Vilhuber, 2019. "Suboptimal Provision of Privacy and Statistical Accuracy When They are Public Goods," Papers 1906.09353, arXiv.org.
    5. Anna Fielder & Riina Vuorikari & Nuria Rodriguez-Priego & Yves Punie, 2016. "Background Review for Developing the Digital Competence Framework for Consumers: A snapshot of hot-button issues and recent literature," JRC Research Reports JRC103332, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Dengler, Sebastian & Prüfer, Jens, 2021. "Consumers' privacy choices in the era of big data," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 499-520.
    7. Wang, Huizong & Hao, Yulong & Fu, Qiang, 2024. "Data factor agglomeration and urban green finance: A quasi-natural experiment based on the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    8. Lluc Vila-Boix & Alicia Blanco-González & Giorgia Miotto & Felipe Hernández-Perlines, 2024. "The impact of social media advertising on brand’ legitimacy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 2115-2138, September.
    9. Alireza Fallah & Michael I. Jordan & Ali Makhdoumi & Azarakhsh Malekian, 2024. "The Limits of Price Discrimination Under Privacy Constraints," Papers 2402.08223, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    10. Mert Demirer & Diego Jimenez-Hernandez & Dean Li & Sida Peng, 2024. "Data, Privacy Laws and Firm Production: Evidence from the GDPR," Working Paper Series WP 2024-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    11. Oliver Budzinski & Annika Stöhr, 2019. "Competition policy reform in Europe and Germany – institutional change in the light of digitization," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 15-54, January.
    12. Daniel Krähmer & Roland Strausz, 2023. "Optimal Nonlinear Pricing with Data-Sensitive Consumers," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 80-108, May.
    13. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2023. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3602-3615, June.
    14. Cecere, Grazia & Le Guel, Fabrice & Soulié, Nicolas, 2012. "Perceived Internet privacy concerns on social network in Europe," MPRA Paper 41437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Frank Ebbers & Jan Zibuschka & Christian Zimmermann & Oliver Hinz, 2021. "User preferences for privacy features in digital assistants," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 411-426, June.
    16. Li, Jianpei & Zhang, Wanzhu, 2022. "Behavior-based pricing and signaling of product quality," MPRA Paper 120263, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Jan 2023.
    17. Ebers, Axel & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2021. "How do warnings affect retail demand for Bitcoin? Evidence from an international survey experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    18. Oghazi, Pejvak & Schultheiss, Rakel & Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Kalmer, Nicolas Philipp & Rad, Fakhreddin F., 2020. "User self-disclosure on social network sites: A cross-cultural study on Facebook’s privacy concepts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 531-540.
    19. Jens Prüfer & Patricia Prüfer, 2020. "Data science for entrepreneurship research: studying demand dynamics for entrepreneurial skills in the Netherlands," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 651-672, October.
    20. Mazurek, Grzegorz & Małagocka, Karolina, 2019. "What if you ask and they say yes? Consumers' willingness to disclose personal data is stronger than you think," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 751-759.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Investor Protection; Investor Education; Digitalisation; Ombudsman; Grievance redressal; SEBI; RBI; DPDP Act; Financial Literacy; Financial Inclusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:17:y:2023:i:3-4:p:251-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ncaer.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.