IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v34y2019i7p745-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A winter sport mega-event and its aftermath: A critical review of post-Olympic PyeongChang

Author

Listed:
  • Jung Woo Lee

Abstract

Almost two years have passed since the Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, and this small rural province has now fully returned to its ordinary routine. In this viewpoint article, I present a critical review of the aftermath of PyeongChang 2018. This short essay focuses on three areas: (a) environmental damage and its restoration process, (b) the construction of the sport facilities and their use after the event, and (c) the sustainability of social infrastructure built for the Winter Olympics. The critical appraisal of the post-Olympic PyeongChang reveals that first , the winter sporting competition is more likely to degrade the natural environment surrounding the Olympic venues than its summer counterpart. Second , winter sporting activities such as ski jumping and bobsled are less likely to develop into community sports due to specific equipment and skills required. Finally , because of this comparatively high opportunity cost, the Winter Olympic Games is an excessively expensive event to host. The 2018 Winter Olympic Games may be seen as South Korean cultural diplomacy at its best. Yet, underneath this South Korean winter fantasy, symptoms of post-Olympic tensions, degeneration, and unfulfilled obligations remain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung Woo Lee, 2019. "A winter sport mega-event and its aftermath: A critical review of post-Olympic PyeongChang," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(7), pages 745-752, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:7:p:745-752
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094219889608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094219889608
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094219889608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nye, Joseph S., 2008. "Public Diplomacy and Soft Power," Scholarly Articles 11738397, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jangwon Kim & Jongnye Han & Eunjeong Kim & Chulwon Kim, 2022. "Quality of Life Subjective Expectations and Exchange from Hosting Mega-Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Yuan Zhang & Zhongqi Xu & Jiabing Wu, 2021. "Influence of Beijing Winter Olympic Games Construction on Vegetation Coverage around Zhangjiakou Competition Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Nicholas Wise & Jan Andre Lee Ludvigsen, 2023. "New notions of soft power: Impact rhetoric in mega-event bid documents," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 306-311, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nyam Elisha Yakubu, 2022. "An Appraisal of Hard Power in Contemporary Practice of Diplomacy," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(02), pages 342-351, February.
    2. Acosta, Matias & Szlamka, Zsofia & Mostajo-Radji, Mohammed A., 2020. "Transnational youth networks: an evolving form of public diplomacy to accelerate the Sustainable Development Goals," SocArXiv 8247s, Center for Open Science.
    3. Michail Ploumis, 2018. "A New Way Forward: Rebalancing the U.S. Security Cooperation with Greece in a Fast Changing Geostrategic Environment," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 95-111, February.
    4. Yazeed Abdullah Almahraj, 2023. "British press coverage of international sports events hosted by Saudi Arabia: content analysis study in light of country concept model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Moran Yarchi & Tal Samuel-Azran & Lidor Bar-David, 2017. "Facebook users’ engagement with Israel’s public diplomacy messages during the 2012 and 2014 military operations in Gaza," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 360-375, November.
    6. Arijit Mazumdar, 2020. "India’s Public Diplomacy in the Twenty-First Century: Components, Objectives and Challenges," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 76(1), pages 24-39, March.
    7. Steven L. Pike, 2023. "What diplomats do: US citizen perspectives on the work of public diplomacy," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 442-455, December.
    8. Xiang Jun & Primiano Christopher B. & Huang Wei-hao, 2015. "Aggressive or Peaceful Rise? An Empirical Assessment of China’s Militarized Conflict, 1979–2010," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 301-325, August.
    9. Suter, Mariana Bassi & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Floriani, Dinorá Eliete & da Silva, Dirceu & Polo, Edison, 2018. "Country-of-origin image (COI) as a country-specific advantage (CSA): Scale development and validation of COI as a resource within the firm perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 46-58.
    10. Li Zhang, 2020. "Research progress in Chinese perceptions of the EU: a critical review and methodological reflection," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 17-34, March.
    11. Tiwari, Rajnish & Prabhu, Jaideep, 2018. "Soft power of frugal innovation and its potential role in India's emergence as a global lead market for affordable excellence," Working Papers 104, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    12. Nisha Garud-Patkar, 2022. "Mediated Public Diplomacy: Frame-building Contest Between the United States and Pakistan During a Conflict," International Studies, , vol. 59(1), pages 58-75, January.
    13. Michał Marcin Kobierecki, 2021. "Aviation diplomacy: a conceptual framework for analyzing the relationship between aviation and international relations," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 293-303, December.
    14. Sirirat Ngamsang, 2013. "Confucius Institutes as Instruments of Soft Power: Comparison with International Rivals," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(10).
    15. Jacklyne Achieng' Aput & Anita Ndoti Kiamba & Peter Kagwanja, 2023. "Public Diplomacy in Regional Integration: Strategizing Policy Goals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 368-384, October.
    16. Juyan Zhang, 2020. "Compassion versus manipulation; narratives versus rational arguments: a PD radar to chart the terrain of public diplomacy," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 195-211, September.
    17. Hendrik W. Ohnesorge, 2022. "The method of comparative-historical analysis: a tailor-made approach to public diplomacy research," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 261-271, September.
    18. George E. Mitchell & Sarah S. Stroup, 2017. "The reputations of NGOs: Peer evaluations of effectiveness," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 397-419, September.
    19. Hannah Moscovitz, 2022. "Projecting the Nation(s) in Multinational Federal Systems: International Education and Nation Branding in Canada/Quebec," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 52(1), pages 82-106.
    20. Jianhong Qi & Kam Ki Tang & Da Yin & Yong Zhao, 2020. "Remaking China’s Global Image with the Belt and Road Initiative: Is the Jury Out?," Discussion Papers Series 635, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:7:p:745-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.