IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v27y2012i1p55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

London’s Olympic legacy and the Imagine methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Bell
  • Judi Farren Bradley

Abstract

In 2010 Future of London commissioned academics to work with representatives from the London Boroughs, to consider the legacy of the Olympic Village taking shape in Stratford, in the East End of London. The exercise, in the form of a workshop, was to: review the current context/situation; prioritize issues; envisage future options; explore and develop relevant sustainability indicators; develop a forward plan for community development. This article describes the process adopted in the analysis of the Olympic Village’s transformation from World Media Site to a sustainable part of the Greater London metropolis. The methodology applied, Imagine, is described and some of the key outputs from the analysis and design of legacy process are described. In conclusion the article examines the oeuvre of projects of this kind when set against the challenges of longer term sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Bell & Judi Farren Bradley, 2012. "London’s Olympic legacy and the Imagine methodology," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(1), pages 55-67, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:27:y:2012:i:1:p:55-67
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094211425325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094211425325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094211425325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Lesca & M.-L. Caron-Fasan, 2008. "Strategic Scanning Project Failure and Abandonment Factors: Lessons Learned," Post-Print halshs-00365164, HAL.
    2. Simon Bell & Stephen Morse, 2007. "Story telling in sustainable development projects," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 97-110.
    3. S Bell & S Morse, 2007. "Problem structuring methods: theorizing the benefits of deconstructing sustainable development projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 576-587, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bell, Simon, 2012. "DPSIR=A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the “Imagine” approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 350-360.
    2. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    3. Koen, Marthinus C. & Newell, Bryce Clayton & Roberts, Melinda R., 2021. "Body-worn cameras: Technological frames and project abandonment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Kim Suzanne Alexander & Joanne Millar & Neil Lipscombe, 2010. "Sustainable development in the uplands of Lao PDR," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 62-70.
    5. Peter Dobers & Delyse Springett, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility: discourse, narratives and communication," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 63-69, March.
    6. White, Leroy, 2016. "Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 827-841.
    7. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    8. Hanen Khanchel & Mohamed Afif Lakhoua & Karim Ben Kahla, 2018. "Operation of the Information Monitoring System for the Optimization of the Processing Time and the Dissemination of Financial Data," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, September.
    9. Jari Lyytimäki & Ulla Rosenström, 2008. "Skeletons out of the closet: effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(5), pages 301-313.
    10. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    11. Marie-Christine Chalus-Sauvannet, 2015. "La veille au service de la réflexion prospective," Post-Print halshs-01231235, HAL.
    12. Simon Bell & Amanda Lane, 2009. "Creating Sustainable Communities - A Means to Enhance Social Mobility?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(8), pages 646-657, December.
    13. Yuqing Liao & Yongchao Ma & Jingliang Chen & Ruirui Liu, 2020. "Evaluation of the Level of Sustainable Development of Provinces in China from 2012 to 2018: A Study Based on the Improved Entropy Coefficient-TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Phi, Giang & Dredge, Dianne & Whitford, Michelle, 2014. "Understanding conflicting perspectives in event planning and management using Q method," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 406-415.
    15. F. de Almeida & M. Pimentel & Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Gilles Guieu, 2020. "Tell me what you read, I'll tell you what you are". Relationship between environmental scanning and strategic orientation," Post-Print halshs-03504476, HAL.
    16. Carlos de las Heras-Rosas & Juan Herrera, 2021. "Innovation and Competitive Intelligence in Business. A Bibliometric Analysis," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:27:y:2012:i:1:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.