IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v21y2024i1p87-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network characterization and simulation via mixed properties of the Barabási–Albert and Erdös–Rényi degree distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Fairul Mohd-Zaid
  • Christine Schubert Kabban
  • Richard F Deckro
  • Wright Shamp

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) is a tool for the operations researcher to understand, monitor, and exploit social and military structures which are key in the intelligence community. However, in order to study and influence a network of interest, the network must first be characterized; preferably to a known network model that captures a mixture of graphical properties exhibited by the social network of interest. In this work, we present a novel statistical method for both characterizing networks via a Binomial-Pareto maximum-likelihood approach and simulating the characterized network using a graph of mixed Barabási–Albert (BA, scale-free) and Erdös–Rényi (ER, randomness) properties. Characterization is performed through a combination of hypothesis tests and method of moments parameter estimation on Pareto and Doubly Truncated Binomial distributions. Application on real-world networks suggests that such networks may be characterized with a mixture of scale-free and random properties as modeled through BA and ER graphs. We demonstrate that our simulation methods are able to capture the degree distribution and density of the networks examined. These results demonstrate that this work establishes a statistical framework upon which network characterization and simulation may be accomplished, thus enabling the adaptation of such methods when generating, manipulating, and observing networks of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Fairul Mohd-Zaid & Christine Schubert Kabban & Richard F Deckro & Wright Shamp, 2024. "Network characterization and simulation via mixed properties of the Barabási–Albert and Erdös–Rényi degree distribution," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(1), pages 87-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:87-102
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129221110893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129221110893
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129221110893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio & Taral Guldahl Seierstad & Odd O. Aalen, 2011. "Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 239-259, March.
    2. Alexander Shapiro & Jos Berge, 2002. "Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 79-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasiou, Andreas, 2017. "Bounds for the normal approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator from m-dependent random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 171-181.
    2. Denter, Philipp & Sisak, Dana, 2015. "Do polls create momentum in political competition?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Salgado Alfredo, 2018. "Incomplete Information and Costly Signaling in College Admissions," Working Papers 2018-23, Banco de México.
    4. Albrecht, James & Anderson, Axel & Vroman, Susan, 2010. "Search by committee," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(4), pages 1386-1407, July.
    5. Blier-Wong, Christopher & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne, 2023. "Risk aggregation with FGM copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 102-120.
    6. Simon Bruhn & Thomas Grebel & Lionel Nesta, 2023. "The fallacy in productivity decomposition," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 797-835, July.
    7. Wim J. van der Linden, 2019. "Lord’s Equity Theorem Revisited," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(4), pages 415-430, August.
    8. Simar, Léopold & Wilson, Paul, 2022. "Modern Tools for Evaluating the Performance of Health-Care Providers," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022006, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Baey, Charlotte & Didier, Anne & Lemaire, Sébastien & Maupas, Fabienne & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2013. "Modelling the interindividual variability of organogenesis in sugar beet populations using a hierarchical segmented model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 56-63.
    10. Tasche, Dirk, 2013. "Bayesian estimation of probabilities of default for low default portfolios," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 6(3), pages 302-326, July.
    11. Diers, Dorothea & Linde, Marc & Hahn, Lukas, 2016. "Addendum to ‘The multi-year non-life insurance risk in the additive reserving model’ [Insurance Math. Econom. 52(3) (2013) 590–598]: Quantification of multi-year non-life insurance risk in chain ladde," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 187-199.
    12. Anastasiou, Andreas, 2017. "Bounds for the normal approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator from m -dependent random variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83635, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Hirschberg, Joe & Lye, Jenny, 2017. "Inverting the indirect—The ellipse and the boomerang: Visualizing the confidence intervals of the structural coefficient from two-stage least squares," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 173-183.
    14. Serguei Kaniovski & Alexander Zaigraev, 2018. "The probability of majority inversion in a two-stage voting system with three states," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 525-546, June.
    15. Packham, Natalie & Woebbeking, Fabian, 2021. "Correlation scenarios and correlation stress testing," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2021-012, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    16. Guillermo Martínez-Flórez & Roger Tovar-Falón & Carlos Barrera-Causil, 2022. "Inflated Unit-Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Xyngis, Georgios, 2017. "Business-cycle variation in macroeconomic uncertainty and the cross-section of expected returns: Evidence for scale-dependent risks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 43-65.
    18. Nair, Gopalan M. & Turlach, Berwin A., 2012. "The stochastic h-index," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 80-87.
    19. Riko Kelter, 2021. "Analysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normality," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1263-1288, June.
    20. Abhishek Ray & Koushiki Sarkar & Diganta Mukherjee, 2015. "Interlinkage between Psychological and Network Characteristics: A Preliminary Analysis," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 3(2), pages 77-88, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:87-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.