IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v19y2022i3p313-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods to measure and track population perception and support within a manual wargame

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Smith
  • Stephen Barker

Abstract

The outcomes of military campaigns depend to a large extent on the support of local and other wider population groups, so it is important to understand their perceptions. Here we briefly describe the approach used to represent support for organizations and factions in a professional wargame designed to represent military campaigns. This specific approach was developed originally using a simple marker track system that used a basic quantified set of relationships between military campaign effects and changes to the track levels. This marker track system was developed for military campaign wargames in the UK as a means to portray support or dissent in population groups relevant to the operations, but there was originally no mechanism to drive changes other than by expert judgment. Our improved approach continues the use of marker tracks but attempts to develop a more defensible method based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs for linking events to changes and levels on the tracks. We conducted experiments to quantify the relative importance of each element in Maslow’s hierarchy. We then continued by conducting a further experiment to identify the impact of a set of effects seen in a wargame against the Maslow elements. This has led to a set of quantified scores that may be used to drive the modifications to the marker tracks when wargame events occur. These scores are based on our initial experiments and may be updated for a specific application, perhaps for a specific setting or location in the world. The revised or enhanced approach aims to produce a transparent solution that can be understood by a military or security analyst, thus facilitating refinement, updating, and change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Smith & Stephen Barker, 2022. "Methods to measure and track population perception and support within a manual wargame," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(3), pages 313-324, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:313-324
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512920963203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512920963203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512920963203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Todd Royle & Angela T. Hall, 2012. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN McCLELLAND’S THEORY OF NEEDS, FEELING INDIVIDUALLY ACCOUNTABLE, AND INFORMAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR OTHERS," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 21-42.
    2. Michael Hagerty, 1999. "Testing Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life Across Time," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 249-271, March.
    3. B Taylor & A Lane, 2004. "Development of a novel family of military campaign simulation models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(4), pages 333-339, April.
    4. repec:ibf:ijmmre:v:5:y:2012:i:2:p:21-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Clarke, Matthew & Islam, Sardar M.N. & Paech, Sally, 2006. "Measuring Australia's well-being using hierarchical needs," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 933-945, December.
    6. Harrell, Adrian M. & Stahl, Michael J., 1984. "McClelland's trichotomy of needs theory and the job satisfaction and work performance of CPA firm professionals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 241-252, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viator, Ralph E., 2001. "The association of formal and informal public accounting mentoring with role stress and related job outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 73-93, January.
    2. Casenave, Eric & Klarmann, Martin, 2020. "The accountability paradox: How holding marketers accountable hinders alignment with short-term marketing goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 95-108.
    3. Antony M. Overstall & David C. Woods, 2016. "Multivariate emulation of computer simulators: model selection and diagnostics with application to a humanitarian relief model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(4), pages 483-505, August.
    4. David C. Facer Jr. & Fred Galloway & Noriyuki Inoue & Drea Zigarmi, 2014. "Creation and Initial Validation of the Motivation Beliefs Inventory: Measuring Leaders¡¯ Beliefs about Employee Motivation Using Four Motivation Theories," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, April.
    5. M. Todd Royle, 2013. "Embeddedness: The Nexus Of Learned Needs, Conscientiousness, And Informal Accountability For Others," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 15-41.
    6. Matthew Clarke, 2010. "Assessing Well-being Using Hierarchical Needs," Working Papers id:2612, eSocialSciences.
    7. Dr. Frederick Edward T. Fabella, 2023. "Investigating the Applicability of Maslow’s Theory of Hierarchy of Needs on Selected Filipino Teachers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 1892-1916, September.
    8. Aditya Singh & Jaison A. Manjaly, 2022. "Using Curiosity to Improve Learning Outcomes in Schools," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    9. Michael Menhart & Andreas Pyka & Bernd Ebersberger & Horst Hanusch, 2003. "Product Innovation and Population Dynamics in the German Insurance Market," Discussion Paper Series 240, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    10. Steven D. Silver, 2016. "A QUAIDS Model of Need-Based Structure in U.S. Personal Consumption 2006–2012," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 44(3), pages 303-323, September.
    11. Cem Başlevent & Hasan Kirmanoğlu, 2013. "Do Preferences for Job Attributes Provide Evidence of ‘Hierarchy of Needs’?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 549-560, April.
    12. Maureen Berner, 2017. "Multidimensional Measures of Poverty: The Potential Contribution of Non‐Profit Food Pantry Data to Assess Community Economic Condition," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 381-401, December.
    13. Xiaocui Ren & Chen Lu, 2021. "Effect of Children’s Support on Depression among Older Adults Living Alone or with a Spouse: A Comparative Analysis between Urban and Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Cem Baslevent & Hasan Kirmanoğlu, 2012. "Do Preferences for Job Attributes Provide Evidence of 'Hierarchy of Needs'," Working Papers 201201, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University.
    15. Gilbert Nyakundi Okebiro & Dr George N. Mose(PhD) & Dr. Dennis M. Mamboleo(PhD), 2023. "Bodaboda Riders’ Behavior on Road Safety Socio-Economic Wellbeing of Lodwar Town Residents in Turkana County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 413-444, February.
    16. Bart Nooteboom, 2012. "Embodied Cognition, Organization and Innovation," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Moffat, James & Medhurst, John, 2009. "Modelling of human decision-making in simulation models of conflict using experimental gaming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1147-1157, August.
    18. Muliawan, Agung D. & Green, Peter F. & Robb, David A., 2009. "The turnover intentions of information systems auditors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 117-136.
    19. Jeremy Smith & Trevor Ringrose & Stephen Barker, 2024. "An experimental intervention to investigate user perceptions of computer versus manual board wargame," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(2), pages 171-179, April.
    20. Rojas, Mariano & Méndez, Alfonso & Watkins-Fassler, Karen, 2023. "The hierarchy of needs empirical examination of Maslow’s theory and lessons for development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:313-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.