IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v15y2018i1p95-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding and taxonomy of uncertainty in modeling, simulation, and risk profiling for border control automation

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana N Yanushkevich
  • Shawn C Eastwood
  • Martin Drahansky
  • Vlad P Shmerko

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of trust in Modeling and Simulation (M&S) technologies, and uncertainty in applications to homeland security. The key goal of this paper is an extension of the notion of trusted M&S techniques for traveler risk assessment in mass-transit applications such as e-borders. Theories of uncertainty suggest that different understandings of uncertainty result in different mechanisms of its reduction. We show that a taxonomy of uncertainty that is accepted in philosophical studies, as well as the NATO methodology of uncertainty assessment (known as the Admiralty Code), can be useful in M&S. This paper overviews various approaches to M&S and focuses on a framework that is based on multi-source fusion mechanisms using Dempster–Shafer (DS) theory. The DS metric is useful for the development of simulators, recommender machines, and risk profilers when expert knowledge is given in an imprecise form. The difference between the Bayesian and DS metrics is introduced via a demonstrative experiment from the area of traveler risk assessment using a biometric-enabled watchlist.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana N Yanushkevich & Shawn C Eastwood & Martin Drahansky & Vlad P Shmerko, 2018. "Understanding and taxonomy of uncertainty in modeling, simulation, and risk profiling for border control automation," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(1), pages 95-109, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:95-109
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512916660637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512916660637
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512916660637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nie, Xiaofeng & Batta, Rajan & Drury, Colin G. & Lin, Li, 2009. "Passenger grouping with risk levels in an airport security system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 574-584, April.
    2. Yoo, Kwang Eui & Choi, Youn Chul, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 135-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Anderson, 2021. "Optimising multi-layered security screening," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 249-273, December.
    2. Salter, Mark B., 2007. "SeMS and sensibility: Security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 389-398.
    3. Olapiriyakul, Sun & Das, Sanchoy, 2007. "Design and analysis of a two-stage security screening and inspection system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 67-74.
    4. Guo, Shu & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2022. "Self-design fun: Should 3D printing be employed in mass customization operations?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 883-897.
    5. Lai, Po‐Lin & Potter, Andrew & Beynon, Malcolm & Beresford, Anthony, 2015. "Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 75-85.
    6. Wang, Xiaofang & Zhuang, Jun, 2011. "Balancing congestion and security in the presence of strategic applicants with private information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 100-111, July.
    7. Hoogstrate, André J. & Klaassen, Chris A.J., 2015. "Information weighted sampling for detecting rare items in finite populations with a focus on security," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 880-887.
    8. Chen, Ying-Hsiu & Lai, Po-Lin & Piboonrungroj, Pairach, 2017. "The relationship between airport performance and privatisation policy: A nonparametric metafrontier approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 229-235.
    9. Yan, Xihong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Optimal placement of multiple types of detectors under a small vessel attack threat to port security," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 71-94.
    10. Jaehn, Florian & Neumann, Simone, 2015. "Airplane boarding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 339-359.
    11. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making approach to the modernization of hold baggage security screening system at an airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    12. Nie, Xiaofeng, 2019. "The impact of conditional dependence on checked baggage screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 883-893.
    13. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    14. Wu, Paul Pao-Yen & Mengersen, Kerrie, 2013. "A review of models and model usage scenarios for an airport complex system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 124-140.
    15. Huang, PoTsang B. & Yu, Tsung-Ying & Chou, Yuan-ju & Lin, Yi-Ching, 2016. "Simulation method for dispatching national border security manpower to mitigate manpower shortage," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 43-51.
    16. Cao, Mengfei & Li, Linbo & Zhang, Yahua, 2023. "Developing a passenger-centered airport: A case study of Urumqi airport in Xinjiang, China," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Nie, Xiaofeng, 2011. "Risk-based grouping for checked baggage screening systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1499-1506.
    18. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2018. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    19. Laura A. McLay & Adrian J. Lee & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2010. "Risk-Based Policies for Airport Security Checkpoint Screening," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 333-349, August.
    20. Zietsman, Davina & Vanderschuren, Marianne, 2014. "Analytic Hierarchy Process assessment for potential multi-airport systems – The case of Cape Town," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 41-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:95-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.