IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v14y2002i4p439-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theory of Post-Civil War Democratization

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard Wantchekon

    (New York University, Department of Economics at Yale University)

  • Zvika Neeman

    (Boston University, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem)

Abstract

We model the transition from a chaotic status quo to a more orderly political regime as a two-stage game involving two warring factions and the citizens. The warring factions move first and decide the form of government by (1) inviting an external arbitrator, (2) choosing the people as arbitrator, i.e. democratizing or (3) maintaining the status quo. We analyze the conditions under which democracy is likely to emerge as the outcome of the game. We show that citizens prefer democracy because it generates a sociopolitical order that protects them against ‘banditry’ and expropriation. Because the citizens’ actions generate positive externalities, incentives for democratization are generated in part by the fact that protection against expropriation under democracy also indirectly benefits the warring factions.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard Wantchekon & Zvika Neeman, 2002. "A Theory of Post-Civil War Democratization," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 14(4), pages 439-464, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:14:y:2002:i:4:p:439-464
    DOI: 10.1177/095162902774006822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095162902774006822
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095162902774006822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood,Elisabeth Jean, 2000. "Forging Democracy from Below," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521783231.
    2. Mr. Jose Martelino & Mr. S. Nuri Erbas & Mr. Adnan Mazarei & Ms. Sena Eken & Mr. Paul Cashin, 1995. "Economic Dislocation and Recovery in Lebanon," IMF Occasional Papers 1995/017, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Wood,Elisabeth Jean, 2000. "Forging Democracy from Below," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521788878.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Ishiyama, 2014. "Civil Wars and Party Systems," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(2), pages 425-447, June.
    2. Corinne Deléchat & Ejona Fuli & Dafina Mulaj & Gustavo Ramirez & Rui Xu, 2018. "Exiting from Fragility in Sub‐Saharan Africa: The Role of Fiscal Policies and Fiscal Institutions," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 86(3), pages 271-307, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Raymond Dresden, 2017. "From combatants to candidates: Electoral competition and the legacy of armed conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(3), pages 240-263, May.
    2. Marino, Maria & Donni, Paolo Li & Bavetta, Sebastiano & Cellini, Marco, 2020. "The democratization process: An empirical appraisal of the role of political protest," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Michael Albertus & Victor Gay, 2017. "Unlikely Democrats: Economic Elite Uncertainty under Dictatorship and Support for Democratization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 624-641, July.
    4. Theo Papaioannou & Andrew Watkins & Dinar Kale & Julius Mugwagwa, 2018. "Politics of innovation and development: The role of industry associations in integrating political, bureaucratic, industrial and health systems in India and South Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 531-551, March.
    5. Tulia G. Falleti, 2016. "Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 455-462, September.
    6. J. W. Fedderke & J. M. Luiz, 2008. "The Political Economy of Institutions, Stability and Investment: A Simultaneous Equation Approach in an Emerging Economy. The Case of South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 1056-1079.
    7. Jonathan H. Conning & James A. Robinson, 2001. "Land Reform and the Political Organization of Agriculture," Department of Economics Working Papers 2001-10, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    8. Charles Butcher & Jessica Maves Braithwaite & Jonathan Pinckney & Eirin Haugseth & Ingrid Vik Bakken & Marius Swane Wishman, 2022. "Introducing the Anatomy of Resistance Campaigns (ARC) dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(3), pages 449-460, May.
    9. Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca & Paloma Aguilar, 2009. "Terrorist Violence and Popular Mobilization: The Case of the Spanish Transition to Democracy," Politics & Society, , vol. 37(3), pages 428-453, September.
    10. Mark Peceny & William D. Stanley, 2010. "Counterinsurgency in El Salvador," Politics & Society, , vol. 38(1), pages 67-94, March.
    11. Samuel Bowles, 2010. "The Coevolution of Institutions and Preferences: History and Theory," Chapters, in: Neri Salvadori (ed.), Institutional and Social Dynamics of Growth and Distribution, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Ravi Bhavnani & Michael Ross, 2003. "Announcement, Credibility, and Turnout in Popular Rebellions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(3), pages 340-366, June.
    13. Erica Chenoweth & Jay Ulfelder, 2017. "Can Structural Conditions Explain the Onset of Nonviolent Uprisings?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(2), pages 298-324, February.
    14. Tianyang Xi, 2014. "Reform or revolution? Theory and evidence on the role of the middle class in the rise of universal male suffrage," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 283-311, April.
    15. Meneses-Reyes, Rodrigo & García-Tejeda, Enrique & Fondevila, Gustavo & Massa, Ricardo, 2021. "No life, no land: Homicide and dispossession in Mexico," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco, 2009. "Stupid and expensive?: a critique of the costs-of-violence literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28496, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. James Heintz, 2002. "Capital Accumulation and Macro Policy in South Africa: Political Instability, Distributive Conflict, and Economic Institutions," Working Papers wp29, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    18. Michael Albertus, 2019. "The Fate of Former Authoritarian Elites Under Democracy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 727-759, March.
    19. Marianna Belloc & Samuel Bowles, 2013. "The Persistence of Inferior Cultural-Institutional Conventions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 93-98, May.
    20. David E. Cunningham & Kristian Skrede Gleditsch & Idean Salehyan, 2013. "Non-state actors in civil wars: A new dataset," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(5), pages 516-531, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:14:y:2002:i:4:p:439-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.