IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v35y1991i4p678-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to Strategy and Communication in an Arms Race-Disarmament Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Betz

    (Kent State University)

Abstract

Subjects (40 males and 40 females) played against a simulated other in a six-choice prisoner's dilemma game that was described in terms of an arms race. The simulated other employed either a GRIT or tit-for-tat strategy, with either communication or no communication. The GRIT strategy elicited more cooperation than the tit-for-tat strategy, and there was an interaction such that the GRIT strategy with communication produced more cooperation than any of the other conditions. In addition, explicit communication decreased the occurrence of deception being employed against the GRIT strategist. Although GRIT produced more conciliation than tit-for-tat, the simulated other using GRIT was also taken advantage of more frequently; to avoid exploitation, modifications in the GRIT strategy may be needed. The results are discussed in terms of how explicit communication is needed for GRIT to be optimally effective and how additional communication may reduce exploitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Betz, 1991. "Response to Strategy and Communication in an Arms Race-Disarmament Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(4), pages 678-690, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:35:y:1991:i:4:p:678-690
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002791035004006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002791035004006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002791035004006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Pilisuk & Paul Potter & Anatol Rapoport & J. Alan Winter, 1965. "War Hawks and Peace Doves: alternate resolutions of experimental conflicts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(4), pages 491-508, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Pilisuk, 1984. "Experimenting with the Arms Race," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(2), pages 296-315, June.
    2. Margaret A. Neale & Max H. Bazerman, 1985. "Perspectives for Understanding Negotiation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 33-55, March.
    3. David W. Conrath, 1970. "Experience as a factor in experimental gaming behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(2), pages 195-202, June.
    4. Leonardelli, Geoffrey J. & Gu, Jun & McRuer, Geordie & Medvec, Victoria Husted & Galinsky, Adam D., 2019. "Multiple equivalent simultaneous offers (MESOs) reduce the negotiator dilemma: How a choice of first offers increases economic and relational outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 64-83.
    5. Barry R. Schlenker & Thomas V. Bonoma, 1978. "Fun and Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 7-38, March.
    6. Luc Reychler, 1979. "The Effectiveness of a Pacifist Strategy in Conflict Resolution," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(2), pages 228-260, June.
    7. Marc Pilisuk & Paul Skolnick & Kenneth Thomas & Reuben Chapman, 1967. "Boredom vs. cognitive reappraisal in the development of cooperative strategy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(1), pages 110-116, March.
    8. John S. Gillis & George T. Woods, 1971. "The 16PF as an indicator of performance in the Prisoner's Dilemma game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(3), pages 393-402, September.
    9. S. Plous, 1985. "Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 363-389, September.
    10. F. Trenery Dolbear Jr & Lester B. Lave, 1966. "Risk orientation as a predictor in the Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 10(4), pages 506-515, December.
    11. William M. Knapp & Jerome E. Podell, 1968. "Mental patients, prisoners, and students with simulated partners in a mixed-motive game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 12(2), pages 235-241, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:35:y:1991:i:4:p:678-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.