IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v27y1983i1p109-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Test of M1(im) Bargaining Sets in Sidepayment Games

Author

Listed:
  • H. Andrew Michener
  • Kenneth Yuen

    (Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison)

Abstract

This article reports an experimental test of the M 1 (im) Cooperative and M 1 (im) Shapley bargaining set solutions in 3-person superadditive, sidepayment games with nonempty core. The results indicate that, on an overall basis, M 1 (im) Cooperative has greater predictive accuracy than does M 1 (im) Shapley. The data also indicate that M 1 (im) Cooperative is comparatively more accurate in games in which the equality vector located inside the core and in games in which the strength of the 13 coalition is high. These findings are consistent with the view that variations in game properties may affect the salience of different standards of fairness that underlie the M 1 (im) bargaining set.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Andrew Michener & Kenneth Yuen, 1983. "A Test of M1(im) Bargaining Sets in Sidepayment Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(1), pages 109-135, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:27:y:1983:i:1:p:109-135
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002783027001004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002783027001004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002783027001004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Maschler, 1963. "The Power of a Coalition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 8-29, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Andrew Michener & Daniel J. Myers, 1998. "Probabilistic Coalition Structure Theories," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 830-860, December.
    2. Roger B. Myerson, 1978. "Conference Structures and Fair Allocation Rules," Discussion Papers 363, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    3. H. Andrew Michener & Greg B. Macheel & Charles G. Depies & Chris A. Bowen, 1986. "Mollifier Representation in Non-Constant-Sum Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(2), pages 361-382, June.
    4. H. Michener & Daniel Myers, 1998. "An Empirical Comparison of Probabilistic Coalition Structure Theories in 3-Person Sidepayment Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 37-82, August.
    5. Kim, Chulyoung & Kim, Sang-Hyun & Lee, Jinhyuk & Lee, Joosung, 2022. "Strategic alliances in a veto game: An experimental study," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Michael Maschler, 2004. "Encouraging a Coalition Formation," Discussion Paper Series dp392, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Gary Bolton & Jeannette Brosig-Koch, 2012. "How do coalitions get built? Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with and without communication," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(3), pages 623-649, August.
    8. Kjell Hausken, 2020. "The Shapley value of coalitions to other coalitions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Martin Shubik, 1988. "The Interaction of Implicit and Explicit Contracts in Repeated Agency," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 891, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Michael Maschler, 2004. "Encouraging a coalition formation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 25-34, April.
    11. H. Andrew Michener & Melvin M. Sakurai & Kenneth Yuen & Thomas J. Kasen, 1979. "A Competitive Test of the M1 (i) and M1 (im) Bargaining Sets," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(1), pages 102-119, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:27:y:1983:i:1:p:109-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.