IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v41y2016i3p300-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grade of Membership Response Time Model for Detecting Guessing Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Pokropek

    (The Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

A response model that is able to detect guessing behaviors and produce unbiased estimates in low-stake conditions using timing information is proposed. The model is a special case of the grade of membership model in which responses are modeled as partial members of a class that is affected by motivation and a class that responds only according to the level of ability. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the proposed model with an approach that ignored guessing and an approach based on item filtering. In each simulated condition, the proposed model outperformed the other approaches by showing the lowest level of bias and the highest precision of item and persons estimates. Finally, the model was estimated using real life data from Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies research (PIAAC). The results showed slight but expected corrections for the levels of proficiency in all countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Pokropek, 2016. "Grade of Membership Response Time Model for Detecting Guessing Behaviors," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(3), pages 300-325, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:41:y:2016:i:3:p:300-325
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998616636618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998616636618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998616636618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Mislevy & Norman Verhelst, 1990. "Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 195-215, June.
    2. Elena Erosheva, 2005. "Comparing Latent Structures of the Grade of Membership, Rasch, and Latent Class Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 619-628, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun-Joo Cho & Allan S. Cohen, 2010. "A Multilevel Mixture IRT Model With an Application to DIF," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(3), pages 336-370, June.
    2. Liu, Yaohui & Zhan, Peida & Fu, Yanbin & Chen, Qipeng & Man, Kaiwen & Luo, Yikun, 2023. "Using a multi-strategy eye-tracking psychometric model to measure intelligence and identify cognitive strategy in Raven's advanced progressive matrices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Michela Gnaldi & Silvia Bacci & Thiemo Kunze & Samuel Greiff, 2020. "Students’ Complex Problem Solving Profiles," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 469-501, June.
    4. Frank Rijmen & Paul De Boeck, 2005. "A relation between a between-item multidimensional IRT model and the mixture rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 481-496, September.
    5. Alexandre Cunha & Diana Sawyer & José Monteiro da Silva & Luca Lazzarini & Marília Rocha & Tamara Santos, 2020. "Country selection for a comparative case study on labour law systems," Policy Research Brief 65, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    6. Chun Wang & Gongjun Xu & Zhuoran Shang, 2018. "A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 223-254, March.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:97-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    9. Frank Rijmen & Paul Boeck & Han Maas, 2005. "An IRT Model with a Parameter-Driven Process for Change," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 651-669, December.
    10. Paul Westers & Henk Kelderman, 1992. "Examining differential item functioning due to item difficulty and alternative attractiveness," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 107-118, March.
    11. Roy Levy & Gregory R. Hancock, 2011. "An Extended Model Comparison Framework for Covariance and Mean Structure Models, Accommodating Multiple Groups and Latent Mixtures," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(2), pages 256-278, May.
    12. Dougal Hutchison & Tilaye Yeshanew, 2009. "Augmenting the use of the Rasch model under time constraints," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 717-729, September.
    13. Heike Heidemeier & Ursula Staudinger, 2012. "Self-Evaluation Processes in Life Satisfaction: Uncovering Measurement Non-Equivalence and Age-Related Differences," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 39-61, January.
    14. Ulf Böckenholt & Ingo Böckenholt, 1991. "Constrained latent class analysis: Simultaneous classification and scaling of discrete choice data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 699-716, December.
    15. Meredith Langi & Minjeong Jeon, 2023. "Identifying and Supporting Academically Low-Performing Schools in a Developing Country: An Application of a Specialized Multilevel IRT Model to PISA-D Assessment Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 332-356, March.
    16. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2007. "Latent Variable Modelling: A Survey," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 712-745, December.
    17. Jean-Jacques Daudin & Laurent Pierre & Corinne Vacher, 2010. "Model for Heterogeneous Random Networks Using Continuous Latent Variables and an Application to a Tree–Fungus Network," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1043-1051, December.
    18. Thomas Love, 1997. "Distractor selection ratios," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 51-62, March.
    19. Javier Revuelta, 2008. "The generalized Logit-Linear Item Response Model for Binary-Designed Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 385-405, September.
    20. Denny Borsboom, 2006. "The attack of the psychometricians," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 425-440, September.
    21. Joemari Olea & Kevin Carl Santos, 2024. "A General Mixture Model for Cognitive Diagnosis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(2), pages 268-307, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:41:y:2016:i:3:p:300-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.