IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v44y2007i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Trade Organization and the EC Biotech Case

Author

Listed:
  • Archna Negi

    (Archna Negi is Assistant Professor in International Organization at the Centre for International Politics, Organization and Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. E-mail: archnanegi@mail.jnu.ac.in)

Abstract

The World Trade Organization is often faced with the challenge of reconciling its central objective of promoting free trade with the imperatives of avoiding adverse effects on the environment and public health. The organization has increasingly had to address this concern through its dispute settlement system and has refined several aspects of the debate through the Reformulated Gasoline, Shrimp-Turtle, Asbestos and Beef-Hormones cases. The EC Biotech case is the latest such dispute that has brought into focus the role of the World Trade Organization in protecting the environment and public health. This high-profile case has brought attention to several procedural issues pertaining to the dispute settlement system, such as the role of advisory experts and of amicus curiae briefs as well as the extended time taken in resolving these special cases, which are marked with a high level of complexity and political sensitivity. Although the panel report has retained a narrow frame of reference, the case has also drawn attention to significant substantive issues such as the definition of ‘undue delay’, the role of science and precaution and the inter-relationship between trade law and public international law. There remain, however, several questions on which the panel commented either inconclusively or not at all. In the event that the panel ruling is appealed, perhaps the Appellate Body will elaborate more fully on some of these crucial concerns that need to be addressed in order to identify a template for interaction between the objectives of free trade and the protection of environment and public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Archna Negi, 2007. "World Trade Organization and the EC Biotech Case," International Studies, , vol. 44(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:44:y:2007:i:1:p:1-22
    DOI: 10.1177/002088170604400101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002088170604400101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002088170604400101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Sindico, 2005. "The GMO Dispute before the WTO: Legal Implications for the Trade and Environment Debate," Working Papers 2005.11, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Daniel Esty, 1994. "Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment, and the Future," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 40, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sturm, Daniel & Ulph, Alistair, 2002. "Environment, trade, political economy and imperfect information: a survey," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0204, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    2. Josh Ederington & Jenny Minier, 2003. "Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 137-154, February.
    3. Theodore Panayotou, 2000. "Globalization and Environment," CID Working Papers 53A, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. de Melo, Jaime & Solleder, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Barriers to trade in environmental goods: How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Ervin, David E. & Fox, Glenn, 1998. "Environmental Policy Considerations In The Grain-Livestock Subsectors In Canada, Mexico And The United States," Proceedings of the 4th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop 1998: Economic Harmonization in the Canadian\U.S.\Mexican Grain-Livestock Subsector; 16754, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    6. Deborah C. Peterson, 2006. "Precaution: principles and practice in Australian environmental and natural resource management ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(4), pages 469-489, December.
    7. J. David Richardson, 2000. "The WTO and market-supportive regulation: a way forward on new competition, technological and labor issues," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 115-130.
    8. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements," Conference Papers 19103, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    9. Colyer, Dale, 2003. "Agriculture and Environmental Issues in Free Trade Agreements," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21.
    10. Ian Sheldon, 2006. "Trade and Environmental Policy: A Race to the Bottom?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 365-392, September.
    11. Tariku, Lamessa, 2015. "The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Air Pollution: In Case of Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 84619, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Biermann, Frank & Simonis, Udo E., 1998. "Needed now: a world environment and development organization," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship Environmental Policy FS II 98-408, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Lee, Hiro & Roland-Holst, David, 1999. "Trade-induced pollution transfers and implications for Japan's investment and assistance," MPRA Paper 82359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sheldon, Ian M., 2010. "Climate Policy and Border Tax Adjustments: Some New Wine Mixed with Old Wine in New Green Bottles?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Patrick Messerlin, 2012. "Climate and trade policies: from mutual destruction to mutual support," Post-Print hal-01024537, HAL.
    16. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations and Agricultural Competitiveness," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17.
    17. Messerlin, Patrick A., 2010. "Climate change and trade policy : from mutual destruction to mutual support," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5378, The World Bank.
    18. ZhongXiang Zhang & Lucas Assunção, 2004. "Domestic Climate Policies and the WTO," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 359-386, March.
    19. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/faqom67ai2qsojk9j15c04u8j is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Theodore Panayotou, 2000. "Globalization and Environment," CID Working Papers 53, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    21. Runge, C. Ford, 2001. "A Global Environment Organization (Geo) And The World Trading System: Prospects And Problems," Working Papers 14448, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:44:y:2007:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.