IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v48y2025i1p92-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Flows Within Chinese Administrative Provinces: The Role of Regional Research Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Liu
  • Julien Pénin
  • Patrick Rondé

Abstract

This paper explores the determinants of knowledge flows, proxied by patent citations, within 31 Chinese administrative provinces. Relying on patent data from the US Patent and Trademark Office during the period 1995-2019, we are able to identify 27118 patent citation pairs (focusing only on USPTO patents with first inventors residing in China). In order to explain the number of citations from a Province to another, in addition to geographic and technological proximity, we use factor analysis in order to capture the effect of regional research structure. In particular, we measure the private versus public research intensity of each Chinese administrative province. Our econometric results show that, as expected, geographical and technological distance between Provinces are negatively correlated with patent citations. In addition, we find that Chinese administrative provinces that show bigger intensity with regard to public and to private research both receive more patent citations and cite more other patents in other Provinces. This effect is particularly significant when the two regions are specialized in private research, which indicates a strong effect of cognitive proximity. Finally, and at odds with prior research, we find that controlling for social proximity between Provinces does not impact the effect of geographical and technological proximity. These results, if confirmed by further studies, might have significant policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Liu & Julien Pénin & Patrick Rondé, 2025. "Knowledge Flows Within Chinese Administrative Provinces: The Role of Regional Research Structures," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 48(1), pages 92-120, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:48:y:2025:i:1:p:92-120
    DOI: 10.1177/01600176241237191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01600176241237191
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/01600176241237191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:48:y:2025:i:1:p:92-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.