IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v55y2018i1p77-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching development: Debates on ‘scientific agriculture’ and ‘rural reconstruction’ at Khalsa College, Amritsar, c. 1915–47

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Philipp Brunner

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of History, Switzerland)

Abstract

The article looks at the planning, introduction and expansion of agricultural education, farming, dairying, co-operation and other related rural economy schemes at Khalsa College, Amritsar (KCA), the first and biggest Sikh higher educational institution in the colonial Punjab, between ca. 1915 and 1947. It examines a set of agricultural initiatives started in the second half of the 1910s as an early attempt at rural reconstruction, and analyses how they were debated among the contemporary paternalist Punjab administration as well as among advocates of ‘rural reconstruction’ across India. The article scrutinises in particular how the Khalsa College had to look for new ways to reinforce its claim of being a lighthouse institution for the dissemination of ‘modern’ and ‘scientific’ agricultural knowledge under the dyarchy system of the interwar years. Through a detailed reconstruction of the college’s engagement with both a national and a transnational development discourse in the final decades of the colonial period, it is shown that ‘agricultural science’ was understood at the KCA as a universal tool for development. As it was not perceived as inherently ‘Western’, there was no need to ‘vernacularise’ it. Revealingly, the USA in particular became a popular destination and point of reference for higher studies in agriculture and rural economics. The college’s various agricultural schemes were consistently legitimised by the well-entrenched orientalist narrative of the supposedly ‘rural’ and ‘practical’ character of the Sikh, the KCA and its ideas on rural development regularly shifted between imperial, nationalist and communal concerns. At the same time, however, its focus on the education of a class of scientifically trained rural specialists paralleled the state-led and expert-driven approaches shared by most nationalist enterprises and the colonial state.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Philipp Brunner, 2018. "Teaching development: Debates on ‘scientific agriculture’ and ‘rural reconstruction’ at Khalsa College, Amritsar, c. 1915–47," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 77-132, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:55:y:2018:i:1:p:77-132
    DOI: 10.1177/0019464617745924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019464617745924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019464617745924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cullather, Nick, 2010. "The Hungry World: America's Cold War Battle against Poverty in Asia," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674725812, Spring.
    2. Sackley, Nicole, 2011. "The village as Cold War site: experts, development, and the history of rural reconstruction," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 481-504, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glover, Dominic & Poole, Nigel, 2019. "Principles of innovation to build nutrition-sensitive food systems in South Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 63-73.
    2. Arun Kumar, 2022. "Philanthropy and the Making of a New Moral Order: A History of Developing Community," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 729-741, May.
    3. Sunil S. Amrith, 2018. "Risk and the South Asian monsoon," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 17-28, November.
    4. Michael Gubser, 2012. "The Presentist Bias: Ahistoricism, Equity, and International Development in the 1970s," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1799-1812, December.
    5. Marcus Taylor & Remy Bargout & Suhas Bhasme, 2021. "Situating Political Agronomy: The Knowledge Politics of Hybrid Rice in India and Uganda," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 168-191, January.
    6. Jonathan Harwood, 2018. "Another Green Revolution? On the Perils of ‘Extracting Lessons’ from History," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 61(1), pages 43-53, December.
    7. Glenn Davis Stone & Dominic Glover, 2017. "Disembedding grain: Golden Rice, the Green Revolution, and heirloom seeds in the Philippines," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 87-102, March.
    8. Maywa Montenegro de Wit, 2022. "Can agroecology and CRISPR mix? The politics of complementarity and moving toward technology sovereignty," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 733-755, June.
    9. Claas Kirchhelle, 2018. "Pharming animals: a global history of antibiotics in food production (1935–2017)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Adrián Gorelik, 2017. "Pan-American routes: a continental planning journey between reformism and the cultural Cold War," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 47-66, January.
    11. Carmen Bain & Sonja Lindberg & Theresa Selfa, 2020. "Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries for gene edited crops for foods in the United States: implications for governance," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(2), pages 265-279, June.
    12. Timothy J. McKeown, 2016. "A different two-level game: foreign policy officials' personal networks and coordinated policy innovation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 93-122, February.
    13. Xiang Gao & Zao Li & Xia Sun, 2023. "Relevance between Tourist Behavior and the Spatial Environment in Huizhou Traditional Villages—A Case Study of Pingshan Village, Yi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Jan Fałkowski, 2018. "U.S. food aid and American exports to recipient countries during the Cold War," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(5), pages 659-668, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:55:y:2018:i:1:p:77-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.