IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v25y2024i5p1290-1313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Mining-based Financial Statement Fraud Detection: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate Data Sample Mapping of Fraudulent Companies Against Non-fraudulent Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Sonika Gupta
  • Sushil Kumar Mehta

Abstract

Data mining techniques have proven quite effective not only in detecting financial statement frauds but also in discovering other financial crimes, such as credit card frauds, loan and security frauds, corporate frauds, bank and insurance frauds, etc. Classification of data mining techniques, in recent years, has been accepted as one of the most credible methodologies for the detection of symptoms of financial statement frauds through scanning the published financial statements of companies. The retrieved literature that has used data mining classification techniques can be broadly categorized on the basis of the type of technique applied, as statistical techniques and machine learning techniques. The biggest challenge in executing the classification process using data mining techniques lies in collecting the data sample of fraudulent companies and mapping the sample of fraudulent companies against non-fraudulent companies. In this article, a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies from the area of financial statement fraud detection has been conducted. The review has considered research articles published between 1995 and 2020. Further, a meta-analysis has been performed to establish the effect of data sample mapping of fraudulent companies against non-fraudulent companies on the classification methods through comparing the overall classification accuracy reported in the literature. The retrieved literature indicates that a fraudulent sample can either be equally paired with non-fraudulent sample (1:1 data mapping) or be unequally mapped using 1:many ratio to increase the sample size proportionally. Based on the meta-analysis of the research articles, it can be concluded that machine learning approaches, in comparison to statistical approaches, can achieve better classification accuracy, particularly when the availability of sample data is low. High classification accuracy can be obtained with even a 1:1 mapping data set using machine learning classification approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Data Mining-based Financial Statement Fraud Detection: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate Data Sample Mapping of Fraudulent Companies Against Non-fraudulent Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1290-1313, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:5:p:1290-1313
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150920984857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150920984857
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150920984857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emie Famieza Zainudin & Hafiza Aishah Hashim, 2016. "Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using financial ratio," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 266-278, October.
    2. Jerry W. Lin & Mark I. Hwang & Jack D. Becker, 2003. "A fuzzy neural network for assessing the risk of fraudulent financial reporting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(8), pages 657-665, November.
    3. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    4. Chyan-long Jan, 2018. "An Effective Financial Statements Fraud Detection Model for the Sustainable Development of Financial Markets: Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Kathleen A. Kaminski & T. Sterling Wetzel & Liming Guan, 2004. "Can financial ratios detect fraudulent financial reporting?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 15-28, January.
    6. Gray, Glen L. & Debreceny, Roger S., 2014. "A taxonomy to guide research on the application of data mining to fraud detection in financial statement audits," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 357-380.
    7. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge & Chad R. Larson & Richard G. Sloan, 2011. "Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 17-82, March.
    8. Mark Cecchini & Haldun Aytug & Gary J. Koehler & Praveen Pathak, 2010. "Detecting Management Fraud in Public Companies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(7), pages 1146-1160, July.
    9. Charalambos T. Spathis, 2002. "Detecting false financial statements using published data: some evidence from Greece," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 179-191, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Feature Selection for Dimension Reduction of Financial Data for Detection of Financial Statement Frauds in Context to Indian Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 323-348, April.
    2. Cebi, Selcuk & Karakurt, Necip Fazıl & Kurtulus, Erkan & Tokgoz, Bunyamin, 2024. "Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Abdullah Albizri & Deniz Appelbaum & Nicholas Rizzotto, 2019. "Evaluation of financial statements fraud detection research: a multi-disciplinary analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 206-241, December.
    4. Elias Zavitsanos & Dimitris Mavroeidis & Konstantinos Bougiatiotis & Eirini Spyropoulou & Lefteris Loukas & Georgios Paliouras, 2023. "Financial misstatement detection: a realistic evaluation," Papers 2305.17457, arXiv.org.
    5. Maria Tragouda & Michalis Doumpos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2024. "Identification of fraudulent financial statements through a multi‐label classification approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), June.
    6. Md Jahidur Rahman & Hongtao Zhu, 2023. "Predicting accounting fraud using imbalanced ensemble learning classifiers – evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3455-3486, September.
    7. Rong Liu & Jujun Huang & Zhongju Zhang, 2023. "Tracking disclosure change trajectories for financial fraud detection," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 584-602, February.
    8. Xiaowei Chen & Cong Zhai, 2023. "Bagging or boosting? Empirical evidence from financial statement fraud detection," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5093-5142, December.
    9. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    10. Ashton, John & Burnett, Tim & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Xin Xu & Feng Xiong & Zhe An, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 137-158, August.
    12. Yunchuan Sun & Xiaoping Zeng & Ying Xu & Hong Yue & Xipu Yu, 2024. "An intelligent detecting model for financial frauds in Chinese A‐share market," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 1110-1136, July.
    13. Dan Amiram & Zahn Bozanic & James D. Cox & Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff & Richard Sloan, 2018. "Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 732-783, June.
    14. Zhang, Yi & Liu, Tianxiang & Li, Weiping, 2024. "Corporate fraud detection based on linguistic readability vector: Application to financial companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    15. Achakzai, Muhammad Atif Khan & Peng, Juan, 2023. "Detecting financial statement fraud using dynamic ensemble machine learning," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Achakzai, Muhammad Atif Khan & Juan, Peng, 2022. "Using machine learning Meta-Classifiers to detect financial frauds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    17. Yang Bao & Bin Ke & Bin Li & Y. Julia Yu & Jie Zhang, 2021. "A Response to "Critique of an Article on Machine Learning in the Detection of Accounting Fraud"," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 18(1), pages 1-71–78, March.
    18. Gavoille, Nicolas & Zasova, Anna, 2023. "What we pay in the shadows: Labor tax evasion, minimum wage hike and employment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Karpoff, Jonathan M., 2021. "The future of financial fraud," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Sunita Goel & Ozlem Uzuner, 2016. "Do Sentiments Matter in Fraud Detection? Estimating Semantic Orientation of Annual Reports," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 215-239, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:5:p:1290-1313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.