IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v17y2016i4p886-904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption in Organizations: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hemlata Gangwar
  • Hema Date

Abstract

Using extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study attempts to assess empirically crucial factors affecting cloud computing adoption intentions. It explores security, availability and compliance-related challenges in cloud computing and makes the necessary recommendation which can help to mitigate the risk in cloud computing. A framework was developed to test the effect of security, availability of cloud service provider and compliance-related factors on cloud computing adoption intentions mediated by perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU). A questionnaire for the factors was developed to collect the data from 280 companies in information technology, manufacturing and finance sectors in India. The data was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Further, structural equation modelling using AMOS 20.0 was used to test the proposed model. The empirical results show that cloud computing adoption intention is determined by PU and PEOU. Further, PU is found to be significantly influenced by PEOU. Risk as well as availability and support are found to be significant on PEOU. In addition, threat, risk, vulnerability and compliance are found to be significant on PU. The model can be used as a guideline to ensure a positive outcome of the cloud computing adoption in organizations. The findings offer cloud computing users with a better understanding of how security, availability of cloud service provider and compliance-related factors affect cloud computing adoption intentions. It also provides relevant recommendations to achieve conducive implementation environment for cloud computing adoption. This study is an attempt to explore and develop model for cloud computing adoption intentions that was theoretically grounded in the TAM.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemlata Gangwar & Hema Date, 2016. "Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption in Organizations: An Empirical Study," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 886-904, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:17:y:2016:i:4:p:886-904
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150916645692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150916645692
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150916645692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Géczy & Noriaki Izumi & Kôiti Hasida, 2012. "Cloudsourcing: Managing Cloud Adoption," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 57-70.
    2. Chen, Lei-Da & Tan, Justin, 2004. "Technology Adaptation in E-commerce:: Key Determinants of Virtual Stores Acceptance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 74-86, February.
    3. Yoris A. Au & Humayun Zafar, 2008. "A Multi-Country Assessment of Mobile Payment Adoption," Working Papers 0055, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemlata Gangwar & Hema Date & R. Ramaswamy, 2015. "Developing a Cloud-Computing Adoption Framework," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 632-651, August.
    2. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M., 2021. "Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Mkedder, Nadjim & Jain, Varsha & Salunke, Parth, 2024. "Determinants of virtual reality stores influencing purchase intention: An interpretive structural modeling approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Han, Sang-Lin & An, Myounga & Han, Jerry J. & Lee, Jiyoung, 2020. "Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 311-320.
    6. Tang, Wei & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2009. "Accounting for Taste Heterogeneity in Purchase Channel Intention Modeling: An Example from Northern California for Book Purchases," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9mg5s5g8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Peter Géczy & Noriaki Izumi & Kôiti Hasida, 2013. "Hybrid Cloud Management: Foundations And Strategies," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 37-50.
    8. Garrison, Gary & Wakefield, Robin L. & Kim, Sanghyun, 2015. "The effects of IT capabilities and delivery model on cloud computing success and firm performance for cloud supported processes and operations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 377-393.
    9. Peter Géczy & Noriaki Izumi & Kôiti Hasida, 2014. "Analytics-Based Management Of Information Systems," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 55-65.
    10. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Sunder Ramachandran & Sreejith Balasubramanian, 2020. "Examining the Moderating Role of Brand Loyalty among Consumers of Technology Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    13. Cao, Xinyu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5z75n416, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Ha, Sejin & Stoel, Leslie, 2009. "Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 565-571, May.
    15. Pallant, Jessica & Sands, Sean & Karpen, Ingo, 2020. "Product customization: A profile of consumer demand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Chung-Ho Su, 2018. "Exploring Sustainability Environment Educational Design and Learning Effect Evaluation through Migration Theory: An Example of Environment Educational Serious Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Lan-Hui Lin & Feng-Chen Lin & Chih-Kang Lien & Tung-Chin Yang & Yao-Kai Chuang & Yi-Wen Hsu, 2023. "Electronic Payment Behaviors of Consumers under Digital Transformation in Finance—A Case Study of Third-Party Payments," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Hai, Le Chi & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain, 2015. "Dynamic Support of Government in Online Shopping," MPRA Paper 66027, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jul 2015.
    19. Adel Ben Youssef & Walid Hadhri & Téja Meharzi, 2015. "Adoption of Cloud Computingin Emerging Countries: The Role of the Absorptive Capacity," Post-Print halshs-01302772, HAL.
    20. Yusuf Arslan & Aykut Hamit Turan, 2022. "Consumers' Acceptance of Online Grocery Shopping in a Pandemic Situation: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Perspective," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 143-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:17:y:2016:i:4:p:886-904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.