IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v9y1985i1p93-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of Survey Response Data On Household Electricity Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin T. Fuj

    (University of Hawaii)

  • Michael Hennessy

    (University of Hawaii)

  • James Mak

    (University of Hawaii)

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the reliability and validity of responses to a survey question inquiring as to whether or not households reduced electricity consumption during the energy crisis by directly comparing survey responses with actual kwh electricity consump tion data before and after second energy crisis of 1979. A response bias arises to the extent that when respondents are confronted directly by an interviewer, they are inclined to provide the interviewer with a socially acceptable response, namely that they reduced their consumption of electricity. Our analysis using data from a large sample of Hawaii households revealed that a bias toward overreporting electricity conservation indeed existed. However, the larger source of error stemmed from response unreliability, as indicated by the weak correlation between reported conservation behavior and actual electricity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin T. Fuj & Michael Hennessy & James Mak, 1985. "An Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of Survey Response Data On Household Electricity Conservation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 93-104, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:9:y:1985:i:1:p:93-104
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8500900106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8500900106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8500900106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnes, Roberta & Gillingham, Robert & Hagemann, Robert, 1981. "The Short-run Residential Demand for Electricity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 63(4), pages 541-552, November.
    2. Edwin T. Fujii & James Mak, 1984. "A Model of Household Electricity Conservation Behavior," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 60(4), pages 340-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johan Graafland & Hugo Smid, 2014. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Really Make a Difference? An Explorative Analysis for Chinese Companies," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 22(2), pages 102-124, March.
    2. Bertha Maya Sopha, 2013. "Sustainable Paper Consumption: Exploring Behavioral Factors," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Johan Graafland, 2017. "Religiosity, Attitude, and the Demand for Socially Responsible Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 121-138, August.
    4. Piyapong Janmaimool, 2017. "Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timmins, Christopher, 2002. "Does the Median Voter Consume Too Much Water? Analyzing the Redistributive Role of Residential Water Bills," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 55(4), pages 687-702, December.
    2. Fell, Harrison & Li, Shanjun & Paul, Anthony, 2014. "A new look at residential electricity demand using household expenditure data," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 37-47.
    3. Fell, Harrison & Linn, Joshua, 2013. "Renewable electricity policies, heterogeneity, and cost effectiveness," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 688-707.
    4. Fan Zhang, 2015. "Energy Price Reform and Household Welfare: The Case of Turkey," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    5. Espey, James A. & Espey, Molly, 2004. "Turning on the Lights: A Meta-Analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Çetinkaya, Murat & Başaran, Alparslan A. & Bağdadioğlu, Necmiddin, 2015. "Electricity reform, tariff and household elasticity in Turkey," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 79-85.
    7. Henningsen, Geraldine & Wiese, Catharina, 2019. "Do Household Characteristics Really Matter? A Meta-Analysis on the Determinants of Households’ Energy-Efficiency Investments," MPRA Paper 101701, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Peter C. Reiss & Matthew W. White, 2001. "Household Electricity Demand, Revisited," NBER Working Papers 8687, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Kussel, Gerhard & Frondel, Manuel, 2016. "Switching Response to Power Prices: Evidence from German Households," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145728, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Juan Pablo Montero & Hugh Rudnick, 2001. "Precios Eléctricos Flexibles," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 38(113), pages 91-109.
    11. Beckman, Jayson & Xiarchos, Irene M., 2013. "Why are Californian farmers adopting more (and larger) renewable energy operations?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 322-330.
    12. Reiss, Peter C. & White, Matthew W., 2002. "Household Electricity Demand, Revisited," Research Papers 1830, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    13. Isamu Matsukawa, 2005. "The Benefits of Information on the Efficient Usage of Consumer Durables," Others 0501005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Michael Hanemann & Xavier Labandeira & José M. Labeaga, 2013. "Energy Demand for Heating: Short Run and Long Run," Working Papers 07-2013, Economics for Energy.
    15. Jacques Fotso, Willy & Mvogo, Gregory & Bidiasse, Honoré, 2023. "Household access to the public electricity grid in Cameroon: Analysis of connection determinants," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Frank T. Denton & Dean C. Mountain & Byron G. Spencer, 2003. "Energy Demand with Declining Rate Schedules: An Econometric Model for the U.S. Commercial Sector," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(1), pages 86-105.
    17. Susanne Bonomo & Massimo Filippini & Peter Zweifel, 1998. "Neue Aufschluesse ueber die Elektrizitaetsnachfrage der schweizerischen Haushalte," SOI - Working Papers 9801, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich.
    18. White, Matthew W. & Reiss, Peter C., 2001. "Household Electricity Demand, Revisited," Research Papers 1715, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    19. Susanne Bonomo & Massimo Filippini & Peter Zweifel, 1998. "Neue Aufschlüsse über die Elektrizitätsnachfrage der schweizerischen Haushalte," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 134(III), pages 415-436, September.
    20. Ohler, Adrienne M. & Loomis, David G. & Ilves, Kadi, 2020. "A study of electricity savings from energy star appliances using household survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:9:y:1985:i:1:p:93-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.