IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v38y2014i1p3-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tailored Panel Management

Author

Listed:
  • Mica Estrada
  • Anna Woodcock
  • P. Wesley Schultz

Abstract

Many psychological processes unfold over time, necessitating longitudinal research designs. Longitudinal research poses a host of methodological challenges, foremost of which is participant attrition. Building on Dillman’s work, we provide a review of how social influence and relationship research informs retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Objective: We introduce the tailored panel management (TPM) approach, which is designed to establish communal norms that increase commitment to a longitudinal study, and this commitment, in turn, increases response rates and buffers against attrition. Specifically, we discuss practices regarding compensation , communication , consistency , and credibility that increase longer term commitment to panel participation. Research design: Throughout the article, we describe how TPM is being used in a national longitudinal study of undergraduate minority science students. TheScienceStudy is a continuing panel, which has 12 waves of data collected across 6 academic years, with response rates ranging from 70% to 92%. Although more than 90% of participants have either left or graduated from their undergraduate degree program, this highly mobile group of people remains engaged in the study. TheScienceStudy has usable longitudinal data from 96% of the original panel. Conclusion: This article combines social psychological theory, current best practice, and a detailed case study to illustrate the TPM approach to longitudinal data collection. The approach provides guidance for other longitudinal researchers, and advocates for empirical research into longitudinal research methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mica Estrada & Anna Woodcock & P. Wesley Schultz, 2014. "Tailored Panel Management," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(1), pages 3-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:38:y:2014:i:1:p:3-28
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X14524956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X14524956
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X14524956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ribisl, Kurt M. & Walton, Maureen A. & Mowbray, Carol T. & Luke, Douglas A. & Davidson, William S. & Bootsmiller, Bonnie J., 1996. "Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: Review and recommendations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis, Erin & Demby, Hilary & Jenner, Lynne Woodward & Gregory, Alethia & Broussard, Marsha, 2016. "Adapting an evidence-based model to retain adolescent study participants in longitudinal research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 102-111.
    2. Stone Celeste & Scott Leslie & Battle Danielle & Maher Patricia, 2014. "Locating Longitudinal Respondents After a 50-Year Hiatus," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 311-334, June.
    3. McGaha, Annette & Boothroyd, Roger A. & Poythress, Norman G. & Petrila, John & Ort, Rhonda G., 2002. "Lessons from the Broward County Mental Health Court Evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 125-135, May.
    4. Tobler, Amy L. & Komro, Kelli A., 2011. "Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: Lessons learned from a cohort of urban adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 87-96, May.
    5. Stefancic, Ana & Schaefer-McDaniel, Nicole J. & Davis, Andrew C. & Tsemberis, Sam, 2004. "Maximizing follow-up of adults with histories of homelessness and psychiatric disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 433-442, November.
    6. Mindlis, Irina & Livert, David & Federman, Alex D. & Wisnivesky, Juan P. & Revenson, Tracey A., 2020. "Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and researchers as a predictor of study attrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Haggerty, Kevin P. & Fleming, Charles B. & Catalano, Richard F. & Petrie, Renee S. & Rubin, Ronald J. & Grassley, Mary H., 2008. "Ten years later: Locating and interviewing children of drug abusers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, February.
    8. Reza Che Daniels & Kim P. Ingle & Timothy S. L. Brophy, 2022. "Determinants of attrition between Waves 1 and 2 of South Africa's National Income Dynamics Study – Coronavirus Rapid Mobile Survey (NIDS‐CRAM)," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 90(4), pages 535-552, December.
    9. Wilke, Dina J. & Radey, Melissa & Langenderfer-Magruder, Lisa, 2017. "Recruitment and retention of child welfare workers in longitudinal research: Successful strategies from the Florida Study of Professionals for Safe Families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-128.
    10. Silvia Russo & Michele Roccato & Alessio Vieno, 2013. "Criminal Victimization and Crime Risk Perception: A Multilevel Longitudinal Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 535-548, July.
    11. Coen, Anita Saranga & Patrick, Diane C. & Shern, David L., 1996. "Minimizing attrition in longitudinal studies of special populations: An integrated management approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 309-319, November.
    12. McGonagle Katherine A. & Schoeni Robert F. & Couper Mick P., 2013. "The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 261-276, September.
    13. Blakeslee, Jennifer E. & Del Quest, A. & Powers, Jennifer & Powers, Laurie E. & Geenen, Sarah & Nelson, May & Dalton, Lawrence D. & McHugh, Elizabeth, 2013. "Reaching everyone: Promoting the inclusion of youth with disabilities in evaluating foster care outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1801-1808.
    14. Mowbray, Carol T. & Bybee, Deborah & Collins, Mary E. & Levine, Phyllis, 1998. "Optimizing evaluation quality and utility under resource constraints," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 59-71, February.
    15. Mein, Gill & Seale, Clive & Rice, Helen & Johal, Suneeta & Ashcroft, Richard E. & Ellison, George & Tinker, Anthea, 2012. "Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2345-2352.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:38:y:2014:i:1:p:3-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.