IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v54y2016icp102-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adapting an evidence-based model to retain adolescent study participants in longitudinal research

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Erin
  • Demby, Hilary
  • Jenner, Lynne Woodward
  • Gregory, Alethia
  • Broussard, Marsha

Abstract

Maintaining contact with and collecting outcome data from adolescent study participants can present a significant challenge for researchers conducting longitudinal studies. Establishing an organized and effective protocol for participant follow-up is crucial to reduce attrition and maintain high retention rates. This paper describes our methods in using and adapting the evidence-based Engagement, Verification, Maintenance, and Confirmation (EVMC) model to follow up with adolescents 6 and 12 months after implementation of a health program. It extends previous research by focusing on two key modifications to the model: (1) the central role of cell phones and texting to maintain contact with study participants throughout the EVMC process and, (2) use of responsive two-way communication between staff and participants and flexible administration modes and methods in the confirmation phase to ensure that busy teens not only respond to contacts, but also complete data collection. These strategies have resulted in high overall retention rates (87–91%) with adolescent study participants at each follow-up data collection point without the utilization of other, more involved tracking measures. The methods and findings presented may be valuable for other researchers with limited resources planning for or engaged in collecting follow-up outcome data from adolescents enrolled in longitudinal studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Erin & Demby, Hilary & Jenner, Lynne Woodward & Gregory, Alethia & Broussard, Marsha, 2016. "Adapting an evidence-based model to retain adolescent study participants in longitudinal research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 102-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:102-111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915001111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobler, Amy L. & Komro, Kelli A., 2011. "Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: Lessons learned from a cohort of urban adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 87-96, May.
    2. Ribisl, Kurt M. & Walton, Maureen A. & Mowbray, Carol T. & Luke, Douglas A. & Davidson, William S. & Bootsmiller, Bonnie J., 1996. "Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: Review and recommendations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blakeslee, Jennifer E. & Del Quest, A. & Powers, Jennifer & Powers, Laurie E. & Geenen, Sarah & Nelson, May & Dalton, Lawrence D. & McHugh, Elizabeth, 2013. "Reaching everyone: Promoting the inclusion of youth with disabilities in evaluating foster care outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1801-1808.
    2. Mindlis, Irina & Livert, David & Federman, Alex D. & Wisnivesky, Juan P. & Revenson, Tracey A., 2020. "Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and researchers as a predictor of study attrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Haggerty, Kevin P. & Fleming, Charles B. & Catalano, Richard F. & Petrie, Renee S. & Rubin, Ronald J. & Grassley, Mary H., 2008. "Ten years later: Locating and interviewing children of drug abusers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Naida Silverthorn & David L. DuBois & Kendra M. Lewis & Amanda Reed & Niloofar Bavarian & Joseph Day & Peter Ji & Alan C. Acock & Samuel Vuchinich & Brian R. Flay, 2017. "Effects of a School-Based Social-Emotional and Character Development Program on Self-Esteem Levels and Processes: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    5. Reza Che Daniels & Kim P. Ingle & Timothy S. L. Brophy, 2022. "Determinants of attrition between Waves 1 and 2 of South Africa's National Income Dynamics Study – Coronavirus Rapid Mobile Survey (NIDS‐CRAM)," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 90(4), pages 535-552, December.
    6. Stone Celeste & Scott Leslie & Battle Danielle & Maher Patricia, 2014. "Locating Longitudinal Respondents After a 50-Year Hiatus," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 311-334, June.
    7. McGaha, Annette & Boothroyd, Roger A. & Poythress, Norman G. & Petrila, John & Ort, Rhonda G., 2002. "Lessons from the Broward County Mental Health Court Evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 125-135, May.
    8. Wilke, Dina J. & Radey, Melissa & Langenderfer-Magruder, Lisa, 2017. "Recruitment and retention of child welfare workers in longitudinal research: Successful strategies from the Florida Study of Professionals for Safe Families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-128.
    9. Silvia Russo & Michele Roccato & Alessio Vieno, 2013. "Criminal Victimization and Crime Risk Perception: A Multilevel Longitudinal Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 535-548, July.
    10. Coen, Anita Saranga & Patrick, Diane C. & Shern, David L., 1996. "Minimizing attrition in longitudinal studies of special populations: An integrated management approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 309-319, November.
    11. McGonagle Katherine A. & Schoeni Robert F. & Couper Mick P., 2013. "The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 261-276, September.
    12. Tobler, Amy L. & Komro, Kelli A., 2011. "Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: Lessons learned from a cohort of urban adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 87-96, May.
    13. Mowbray, Carol T. & Bybee, Deborah & Collins, Mary E. & Levine, Phyllis, 1998. "Optimizing evaluation quality and utility under resource constraints," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 59-71, February.
    14. Mein, Gill & Seale, Clive & Rice, Helen & Johal, Suneeta & Ashcroft, Richard E. & Ellison, George & Tinker, Anthea, 2012. "Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2345-2352.
    15. Stefancic, Ana & Schaefer-McDaniel, Nicole J. & Davis, Andrew C. & Tsemberis, Sam, 2004. "Maximizing follow-up of adults with histories of homelessness and psychiatric disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 433-442, November.
    16. Mica Estrada & Anna Woodcock & P. Wesley Schultz, 2014. "Tailored Panel Management," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(1), pages 3-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:102-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.