IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v28y2004i1p3-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court Program

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Shanahan
  • Emily Lancsar
  • Marion Haas
  • Bronwyn Lind
  • Don Weatherburn
  • Shuling Chen

Abstract

In New South Wales, Australia, a cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted of an adult drug court (ADC) program as an alternative to jail for criminal offenders addicted to illicit drugs. This article describes the program, the cost-effectiveness analysis, and the results. The results of this study reveal that, for the 23-month period of the evaluation, the ADC was as cost-effective as were conventional sanctions in delaying the time to the first offense and more cost-effective in reducing the frequency of offending for those outcome measures selected. Although the evaluation was conducted using the traditional steps of a cost-effectiveness analysis, because of the complexity of the program and data limitations it was not always possible to adhere to textbook procedures. As such, each step involved in undertaking the cost-effectiveness analysis is discussed, highlighting the key issues faced in the evaluation .

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Shanahan & Emily Lancsar & Marion Haas & Bronwyn Lind & Don Weatherburn & Shuling Chen, 2004. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 28(1), pages 3-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:28:y:2004:i:1:p:3-27
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03257531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X03257531
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X03257531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bronwyn Lind & Don Weatherburn & Shuling Chen & Marian Shanahan & Emily Lancsar & Marion Haas, 2002. "New South Wales drug court evaluation: Cost-effectiveness, CHERE Project Report 17a," Research Reports 17a, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Edward Godber & Ray Robinson & Andrea Steiner, 1997. "Economic Evaluation and the Shifting Balance Towards Primary Care: Definitions, Evidence and Methodological Issues," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(3), pages 275-294, May.
    3. Nicholas Graves & Damian Walker & Rosalind Raine & Andrew Hutchings & Jennifer A. Roberts, 2002. "Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(8), pages 735-739, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth L. C. Merrall & Sheila M. Bird, 2009. "A Statistical Perspective on the Design of Drug-Court Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 257-280, June.
    2. Amanda E. Perry & Rebecca Woodhouse & Matthew Neilson & Marrissa Martyn St James & Julie Glanville & Catherine Hewitt & Dominic Trépel, 2016. "Are Non-Pharmacological Interventions Effective in Reducing Drug Use and Criminality? A Systematic and Meta-Analytical Review with an Economic Appraisal of These Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marion Haas & Marian Shanahan & Rob Anderson, 2007. "Assessing the costs of organised health programs: The case of the National Cervical Screening Program," Working Papers 2007/2, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Jeff Borland & Yi-Ping Tseng & Roger Wilkins, 2013. "Does Coordination of Welfare Services Delivery Make a Difference for Extremely Disadvantaged Jobseekers? Evidence from the ‘YP-super-4’ Trial," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 89(287), pages 469-489, December.
    3. Richard Grieve & John Cairns & Simon G. Thompson, 2010. "Improving costing methods in multicentre economic evaluation: the use of multiple imputation for unit costs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 939-954, August.
    4. Bronwyn Lind & Don Weatherburn & Shuling Chen & Marian Shanahan & Emily Lancsar & Marion Haas, 2002. "New South Wales drug court evaluation: Cost-effectiveness, CHERE Project Report 17a," Research Reports 17a, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    5. Rob Anderson & Marion Haas, 2001. "Cost-effectiveness of shared care compared with usual hospital-based care for people with Hepatitis C, CHERE Project Report No 17," Research Reports 17, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    6. Hana M. Broulíková & Petr Winkler & Marek Páv & Lucie Kondrátová, 2020. "Costs of Mental Health Services in Czechia: Facilitating an Evidence-Based Reform of Psychiatric Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 287-298, April.
    7. Manuel Gomes & Richard Grieve & Richard Nixon & W. J. Edmunds, 2012. "Statistical Methods for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses That Use Data from Cluster Randomized Trials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 209-220, January.
    8. Andrea Gabrio & Alexina J. Mason & Gianluca Baio, 2017. "Handling Missing Data in Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Review with Future Recommendations," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 79-97, June.
    9. Ernst, Chris & Rouse, Paul, 2016. "Complexity, Tertiariness and Healthcare: Unresolved Issues of Reimbursement and Incentives," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(3), pages 227-247.
    10. K Taylor & B Dangerfield, 2005. "Modelling the feedback effects of reconfiguring health services," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 659-675, June.
    11. Shelley Potter & Charlotte Davies & Gareth Davies & Caoimhe Rice & William Hollingworth, 2020. "The use of micro-costing in economic analyses of surgical interventions: a systematic review," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Alvin Kuo Jing Teo & Kiesha Prem & Yi Wang & Tripti Pande & Marina Smelyanskaya & Lisanne Gerstel & Monyrath Chry & Sovannary Tuot & Siyan Yi, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Community Tuberculosis Active Case-Finding Approaches in Cambodia: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Robinson, Ray, 1999. "Limits to rationality: economics, economists and priority setting," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 13-26, September.
    14. Rob Anderson, 2010. "Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 350-364, March.
    15. M. Carreras & M. García-Goñi & P. Ibern & J. Coderch & L. Vall-Llosera & J. Inoriza, 2011. "Estimates of patient costs related with population morbidity: can indirect costs affect the results?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(4), pages 289-295, August.
    16. Ojmarrh Mitchell & David B. Wilson & Amy Eggers & Doris L. MacKenzie, 2012. "Drug Courts' Effects on Criminal Offending for Juveniles and Adults," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages -87.
    17. Elizabeth L. C. Merrall & Sheila M. Bird, 2009. "A Statistical Perspective on the Design of Drug-Court Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 257-280, June.
    18. Adam Martin & Alex Jones & Miranda Mugford & Ian Shemilt & Ruth Hancock & Raphael Wittenberg, 2012. "Methods Used To Identify And Measure Resource Use In Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Review Of Questionnaires For Older People," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(8), pages 1017-1022, August.
    19. Alfredo Palacios & Carlos Rojas-Roque & Lucas González & Ariel Bardach & Agustín Ciapponi & Claudia Peckaitis & Andres Pichon-Riviere & Federico Augustovski, 2021. "Direct Medical Costs, Productivity Loss Costs and Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures in Women with Breast Cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 485-502, May.
    20. Andrew Leigh, 2003. "Randomised Policy Trials," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 341-354.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:28:y:2004:i:1:p:3-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.