IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v16y2007i3p369-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of the Vision and Mission Statements of International Environmental Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Campagna
  • Teresita Fernà Ndez

Abstract

The vision and mission statements of 24 environmental organisations were analysed under the premise that the language used in these statements reflects and influences the priorities of their operation. A dominant perspective, hinging on the concept of ‘sustainable development’, merged the profile of government agencies and non-governmental groups. The language reflected an utilitarian ethics: the environment was more generally portrayed as resources than as nature. Aesthetic remarks were exceptional, even among groups focusing on wildlife. Despite a broadly claimed link between human welfare and habitat viability, environmental issues were not broadly referred to by humanitarian organisations, while conservation groups comply with societal priorities and needs. Organisational statements seem more concerned about political legitimation by audiences with specific expectations than about articulating purposes with internal structural consequences or goals that advocate change or reflect organisational uniqueness.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Campagna & Teresita Fernà Ndez, 2007. "A Comparative Analysis of the Vision and Mission Statements of International Environmental Organisations," Environmental Values, , vol. 16(3), pages 369-398, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:369-398
    DOI: 10.3197/096327107X228409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327107X228409
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3197/096327107X228409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher C. Morphew & Matthew Hartley, 2006. "Mission Statements: A Thematic Analysis of Rhetoric across Institutional Type," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 456-471, May.
    2. Shi, Tian, 2004. "Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 23-36, January.
    3. Tuovi Allèn, 1992. "Economic Development and the Feminisation of Poverty," International Economic Association Series, in: Nancy Folbre & Barbara Bergmann & Bina Agarwal & Maria Floro (ed.), Women’s Work in the World Economy, chapter 5, pages 107-119, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isis Brook, 2008. "Convergence, Divergence and the Complex Nature of Environmental Problems," Environmental Values, , vol. 17(1), pages 1-3, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plumecocq, Gaël, 2014. "The second generation of ecological economics: How far has the apple fallen from the tree?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 457-468.
    2. Farrell, Katharine N., 2011. "Framing the Valuation of Ecosystem Services: A Theoretical Discussion of the Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Articulating Values that Reflect the Economic Contributions of Ecological Phen," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114362, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Bayrak, Tuncay, 2020. "A content analysis of top-ranked universities’ mission statements from five global regions," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020. "How cultural dimensions, legal systems, and industry affect environmental reporting? Empirical evidence from an international perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2037-2057, July.
    5. Toni A. Ihme & Katharina Sonnenberg & Maria-Luisa Barbarino & Björn Fisseler & Stefan Stürmer, 2016. "How University Websites’ Emphasis on Age Diversity Influences Prospective Students’ Perception of Person-Organization Fit and Student Recruitment," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(8), pages 1010-1030, December.
    6. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2021. "Rhetoric, epistemology and climate change economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Janse, Gerben, 2006. "Information search behaviour of European forest policy decision-makers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(6), pages 579-592, August.
    8. Carrie B. Myers & Scott M. Myers & Martha Peters, 2019. "The Longitudinal Connections Between Undergraduate High Impact Curriculum Practices and Civic Engagement in Adulthood," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(1), pages 83-110, February.
    9. Biscotti, Anna Maria & D'Amico, Eugenio, 2016. "What are political leaders' environmental intentions? The impact of social identification processes and macro-economic conditions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 152-160.
    10. Kastenhofer, Karen & Bechtold, Ulrike & Wilfing, Harald, 2011. "Sustaining sustainability science: The role of established inter-disciplines," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 835-843, February.
    11. Lehtonen, Markku, 2009. "OECD organisational discourse, peer reviews and sustainable development: An ecological-institutionalist perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 389-397, December.
    12. Matutinovic, Igor, 2006. "Mass migrations, income inequality and ecosystems health in the second wave of a globalization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 199-203, September.
    13. Bogelund, Pia, 2007. "Making green discourses matter in policy-making: Learning from discursive power struggles within the policy area of car taxation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 78-92, June.
    14. Nicholas A. Bowman & Gregory C. Wolniak & Tricia A. Seifert & Kathleen Wise & Charles Blaich, 2023. "The Long-Term Role of Undergraduate Experiences: Predicting Intellectual and Civic Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(3), pages 379-401, May.
    15. Ho¨lzinger, Oliver & Horst, Dan van der & Sadler, Jon, 2014. "City-wide Ecosystem Assessments—Lessons from Birmingham," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 98-105.
    16. Katia Giusepponi & Ernesto Tavoletti, 2018. "Vision and Mission Statements in Italian Universities: Results of an Empirical Investigation on Strategic Orientation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 301-328, March.
    17. Ishfaq Ahmed & Waqas Farooq & Tariq Iqbal Khan, 2021. "Customers’ Perceptions and their Responses to Objectives of Islamic Banks – A Three-Wave Investigation," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(1), pages 43-56, January.
    18. Anushree Karani & Heena Thanki & Sarla Achuthan, 2021. "Impact of University Website Usability on Satisfaction: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(2), pages 119-138, May.
    19. Shi, Tian & Gill, Roderic, 2005. "Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 223-246, April.
    20. Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez, 2018. "Assessing corporate environmental issues in international companies: A study of explanatory factors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1284-1294, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:369-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.