IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v42y2024i5p708-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics and spaces of public-private partnerships in humanitarian tech innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Egger

Abstract

The past decade has seen a growing engagement of tech companies in conflict settings to develop multifaceted technological innovations, including digital biometric identification to register refugees, commercial drones to deliver cargo, and big data-fuelled algorithms to predict the spread of crises. Humanitarian technology has been largely acclaimed as a way of making aid more effective and of triggering a paradigm shift in humanitarian governance by putting crisis-affected communities in what is claimed to be the driving seat of aid programmes. Critics are however wary about the negative impacts these innovations have on humanitarian practices and crisis-affected population. This paper contributes to this debate by assessing whether technological innovations fundamentally alter the politics and spaces of humanitarian governance. To do so, it analyses the way public private partnerships (PPPs) mediate between the interests of the various stakeholders of tech experiments and distribute power among them. Drawing upon the exploratory analysis of 22 tech projects in crisis settings, a typology of PPPs is formalised based on the way they distribute power and resources among their stakeholders. The results show that only one type of PPPs - community-based digital humanitarianism – has the potential of increasing the ownership of crisis-affected communities over aid programmes and localising projects in so-called Global South societies. The two other types – technologising the humanitarian business and externalising the lab to crisis settings – appear as a continuation of neo-colonial practices with a digital touch.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Egger, 2024. "The politics and spaces of public-private partnerships in humanitarian tech innovations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(5), pages 708-724, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:5:p:708-724
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544231206822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544231206822
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544231206822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Róisín Read & Bertrand Taithe & Roger Mac Ginty, 2016. "Data hubris? Humanitarian information systems and the mirage of technology," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1314-1331, August.
    2. Linnet Taylor, 2021. "Exploitation as innovation: research ethics and the governance of experimentation in the urban living lab," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 1902-1912, December.
    3. Bimal Kanti Paul & Bidhan Acharya & Kabita Ghimire, 2017. "Effectiveness of earthquakes relief efforts in Nepal: opinions of the survivors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1169-1188, January.
    4. Andreas Fuchs & Hannes Öhler, 2021. "Does private aid follow the flag? An empirical analysis of humanitarian assistance," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 671-705, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Merlijn van Hulst, 2024. "Reimagining Urban Living Labs: Enter the Urban Drama Lab," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 991-1012, May.
    2. Ann-Sofie Isaksson & Dick Durevall, 2023. "Aid and institutions: Local effects of World Bank aid on perceived institutional quality in Africa," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 523-551, July.
    3. Xinxin Yan & Hanping Hou & Jianliang Yang & Jiaqi Fang, 2021. "Site Selection and Layout of Material Reserve Based on Emergency Demand Graduation under Large-Scale Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Baharmand, Hossein & Comes, Tina & Lauras, Matthieu, 2019. "Bi-objective multi-layer location–allocation model for the immediate aftermath of sudden-onset disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 86-110.
    5. Eichenauer, Vera Z. & Fuchs, Andreas & Kunze, Sven & Strobl, Eric, 2020. "Distortions in aid allocation of United Nations flash appeals: Evidence from the 2015 Nepal earthquake," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Akbarpour, Mina & Ali Torabi, S. & Ghavamifar, Ali, 2020. "Designing an integrated pharmaceutical relief chain network under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Kaplan, Lennart, 2020. "Systemic challenges and opportunities of Franco-German development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Veeshan Rayamajhee & Alok K. Bohara & Virgil Henry Storr, 2020. "Ex-Post Coping Responses and Post-Disaster Resilience: a Case from the 2015 Nepal Earthquake," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 575-599, October.
    9. Christian Fikar & Patrick Hirsch & Pamela C. Nolz, 2018. "Agent-based simulation optimization for dynamic disaster relief distribution," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(2), pages 423-442, June.
    10. Bahul Shrestha & Pairote Pathranarakul, 2018. "Nepal Government’s Emergency Response to the 2015 Earthquake: A Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:5:p:708-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.