IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v36y2018i6p1109-1132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring practitioners’ perception of ethical issues in planning: The Peruvian case

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica S Pineda-Zumaran

Abstract

Despite the ethics of planning in the Global South is an issue of crucial importance due to the challenging circumstances in which the discipline is practiced in the region, this discussion is still at this initial stage. This article contributes to expanding on the matter through an approach to identify the influence on practitioners’ perception of ethical issues of the planning purposes and values embedded within five frames of reference of practice (i.e. professional training, professionalization bodies, institutional settings, planning systems and policy frameworks). Using the case of professional architects working as planners for municipalities in Arequipa (Peru), the article starts with an exploratory comparison between the purposes and values put forward by professional training in planning and architecture and then contrast these with the planning purposes and values purveyed by professionalization bodies, institutional settings, planning systems, and policy frameworks. These results support the analysis of practitioners’ perception of ethical issues. This shows that the understanding of planning purposes and values of Peruvian architects acting as planners and the views of the country’s architecture professionalization body contributes to strengthening the regulatory, technical, and apolitical orientation of the Peruvian planning system. With the adoption of neoliberal urban policies and within the ethically inconsistent municipal institutional setting, architects’ operationalization of their understanding of planning purposes and values leads to a procedural perception of ethical issues, which is based on the belief that these center on conflicts of personal principles. Their belated realization that ethical issues also concern conflict of interests adds to their questioning of the idea of planning, making the discipline’s practice in the country even more challenging.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica S Pineda-Zumaran, 2018. "Exploring practitioners’ perception of ethical issues in planning: The Peruvian case," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1109-1132, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:6:p:1109-1132
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654417745875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654417745875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654417745875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren Yiftachel, 2000. "Social Control, Urban Planning and Ethno‐class Relations: Mizrahi Jews in Israel's ‘Development Towns’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 418-438, June.
    2. Tej Kumar Karki, 2017. "What Should Planners Do to Address Unethical Political Pressure?," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 103-119, March.
    3. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2013. "How Planners Deal with Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Dubious Ethics of the American Planning Association," Papers 1303.7405, arXiv.org.
    4. Heather Campbell & Robert Marshall, 2000. "Moral Obligations, Planning, and the Public Interest: A Commentary on Current British Practice," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(2), pages 297-312, April.
    5. Eduardo Morón & Cynthia Sanborn, 2007. "Instituciones y actores," Chapters of Books, in: Eduardo Morón & Cynthia Sanborn (ed.), Los desafíos del policymaking en el Perú: actores, instituciones y reglas de juego, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 65-88, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linda Fox-Rogers & Enda Murphy, 2016. "Self-perceptions of the role of the planner," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(1), pages 74-92, January.
    2. Baudot, Lisa & Cooper, David J., 2022. "Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Alexander Koensler, 2016. "Acts of Solidarity: Crossing and Reiterating Israeli–Palestinian Frontiers," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 340-356, March.
    4. Efrat Eizenberg & Mor Shilon, 2016. "Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining the qualitative toolbox," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1118-1135, November.
    5. Erez Tzfadia, 2005. "Academic Discourse on Making New Towns in Israel: Three Approaches in Social Science," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(4), pages 475-491, August.
    6. Petra Nahmias & Guy Stecklov, 2007. "The dynamics of fertility amongst Palestinians in Israel from 1980 to 2000," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 71-99, March.
    7. Gunter Ashley, 2014. "Mega events as a pretext for infrastructural development: the case of the All African Games Athletes Village, Alexandra, Johannesburg," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 23(23), pages 39-52, March.
    8. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    9. Leck, Eran & Bekhor, Shlomo & Gat, Daniel, 2008. "Equity Impacts of Transportation Improvements On Core and Peripheral Cities," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 1(2), pages 153-182.
    10. Cynthia A. Sanborn & Tania Ramirez & Veronica Hurtado, 2017. "Mining, political settlements and inclusive development in Peru," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-079-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    11. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2018. "Debunking fake news in a post-truth era: The plausible untruths of cost underestimation in transport infrastructure projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 357-368.
    12. Nicole Gurran & Catherine Gilbert & Peter Phibbs, 2015. "Sustainable development control? Zoning and land use regulations for urban form, biodiversity conservation and green design in Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 1877-1902, November.
    13. Christopher Snary, 2004. "Understanding Risk: The Planning Officers' Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 33-55, January.
    14. Niamh Murtagh & Nezhapi-Dellé Odeleye & Christopher Maidment, 2019. "Identities as Enabling Conditions of Sustainability Practices in Urban Planning: A Critical Realist Exploration with Planners in England," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 86-97.
    15. Joanna Wai Ying Lee & Wing-Shing Tang, 2017. "The hegemony of the real estate industry: Redevelopment of ‘Government/Institution or Community’ (G/IC) land in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3403-3422, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:6:p:1109-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.