IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i9p2146-2163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of street network connectivity on active school travel: Norway’s HUNT study

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Schön
  • Eva Heinen
  • Vegar Rangul
  • Erik R Sund
  • Bendik Manum

Abstract

Active travel to school (ATS) is promoted due to its benefits for health, mental well-being and the environment. Although the impact of the urban form on ATS has been extensively researched, findings have remained contradictory. Existing studies have mainly relied on aggregated, area-based measures, scarcely applying disaggregated, network-based measures of accessibility, street configurations, connectivity or urban density. This study addresses issues related to aggregation and the lack of ATS-specific network measures to evaluate the connectivity of routes to school. We examined the associations of route betweenness, reach and weighted reach with ATS, while adjusting for age, gender, traffic and proximity to school. Population data are disaggregated within a 50-m accuracy of address points. We introduce ‘route betweenness’, a new network-based measure for assessing the connectivity of entire shortest routes. We measured network accessibility around homes as reach (i.e., the number of streets reached through the network), and urban density as weighted reach (i.e., as the floor area or population accessible within walk-/cyclable distances). ATS was measured through self-reported walking or cycling to school (yes or no). The results show positive associations of route betweenness with ATS. The findings further indicate that, whilst higher connectivity and accessibility around home can increase ATS, the connectivity of the network along the way to school, as grasped by route betweenness, is even more important.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Schön & Eva Heinen & Vegar Rangul & Erik R Sund & Bendik Manum, 2024. "The impact of street network connectivity on active school travel: Norway’s HUNT study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2146-2163, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:9:p:2146-2163
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241235978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241235978
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241235978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas V. Vasey & Suzanne J. Carroll & Mark Daniel & Margaret Cargo, 2022. "Changing Primary School Children’s Engagement in Active School Travel Using Safe Routes to School Interventions: A Rapid Realist Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Raktim Mitra, 2013. "Independent Mobility and Mode Choice for School Transportation: A Review and Framework for Future Research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 21-43, January.
    3. Crispin H. V. Cooper & Ian Harvey & Scott Orford & Alain J. F. Chiaradia, 2021. "Using multiple hybrid spatial design network analysis to predict longitudinal effect of a major city centre redevelopment on pedestrian flows," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 643-672, April.
    4. Lowry, Michael B. & Furth, Peter & Hadden-Loh, Tracy, 2016. "Prioritizing new bicycle facilities to improve low-stress network connectivity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 124-140.
    5. Sevtsuk, Andres & Basu, Rounaq, 2022. "The role of turns in pedestrian route choice: A clarification," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Shatu, Farjana & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Bunker, Jonathan, 2019. "Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing of space syntax and geographic theories concerning pedestrian route choice behaviour," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 37-52.
    7. Paul L. Knight & Wesley E. Marshall, 2015. "The metrics of street network connectivity: their inconsistencies," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 241-259, September.
    8. Ayse Ozbil & Demet Yesiltepe & Gorsev Argin & Greg Rybarczyk, 2021. "Children’s Active School Travel: Examining the Combined Perceived and Objective Built-Environment Factors from Space Syntax," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Andres Sevtsuk, 2021. "Estimating Pedestrian Flows on Street Networks," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(4), pages 512-526, October.
    10. Iacono, Michael & Krizek, Kevin J. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2010. "Measuring non-motorized accessibility: issues, alternatives, and execution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 133-140.
    11. M. J. Aranda-Balboa & F. J. Huertas-Delgado & M. Herrador-Colmenero & G. Cardon & P. Chillón, 2020. "Parental barriers to active transport to school: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(1), pages 87-98, January.
    12. Xiaofeng Ji & Haotian Guan & Mengyuan Lu & Fang Chen & Wenwen Qin, 2022. "International Research Progress in School Travel and Behavior: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia A. González & Olga L. Sarmiento & Pablo D. Lemoine & Richard Larouche & Jose D. Meisel & Mark S. Tremblay & Melisa Naranjo & Stephanie T. Broyles & Mikael Fogelholm & Gustavo A. Holguin & Estel, 2020. "Active School Transport among Children from Canada, Colombia, Finland, South Africa, and the United States: A Tale of Two Journeys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Sevtsuk, Andres & Basu, Rounaq, 2022. "The role of turns in pedestrian route choice: A clarification," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Zhou, You & Zhang, Lingzhu & JF Chiaradia, Alain, 2022. "Estimating wider economic impacts of transport infrastructure Investment: Evidence from accessibility disparity in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 220-235.
    4. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    5. Faghih Imani, Ahmadreza & Miller, Eric J. & Saxe, Shoshanna, 2019. "Cycle accessibility and level of traffic stress: A case study of Toronto," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Eva Savolainen & Stina Rutberg & Ylva Backman & Anna-Karin Lindqvist, 2020. "Long-Term Perspectives of a School-Based Intervention to Promote Active School Transportation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Ho Yeung Lam & Sisitha Jayasinghe & Kiran D. K. Ahuja & Andrew P. Hills, 2023. "Active School Commuting in School Children: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Siying Zhu & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Multi-objective bike-way network design problem with space–time accessibility constraint," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2479-2503, October.
    9. Andres Sevtsuk & Rounaq Basu & Bahij Chancey, 2021. "We shape our buildings, but do they then shape us? A longitudinal analysis of pedestrian flows and development activity in Melbourne," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Shota Tabata, 2024. "A centrality measure for grid street network considering sequential route choice behaviour," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 610-624, March.
    11. Saad AlQuhtani, 2023. "Factors Affecting Active Commuting to School in Sprawled Cities: The Case of Najran City, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Basu, Rounaq & Sevtsuk, Andres, 2022. "How do street attributes affect willingness-to-walk? City-wide pedestrian route choice analysis using big data from Boston and San Francisco," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-19.
    13. An, Zihao & Xie, Bo & Liu, Qiyang, 2023. "No street is an Island: Street network morphologies and traffic safety," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 167-181.
    14. Sadayuki, Taisuke, 2018. "Measuring the spatial effect of multiple sites: An application to housing rent and public transportation in Tokyo, Japan," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 155-173.
    15. Brendan Murphy & David Levinson & Andrew Owen, 2015. "Accessibility and Centrality Based Estimation of Urban Pedestrian Activity," Working Papers 000143, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    16. Scoppa, Martin & Bawazir, Khawla & Alawadi, Khaled, 2019. "Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 770-782.
    17. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    18. Lissy La Paix & Karst Geurs, 2015. "Scenarios for measuring station-based impedances in a national transport model," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1310, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Kian Wee Chen & Leslie Norford, 2017. "Evaluating Urban Forms for Comparison Studies in the Massing Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:9:p:2146-2163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.