IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v47y2020i3p523-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-scale spatial network models: An application to modeling information diffusion through the homeless population of San Francisco

Author

Listed:
  • Zack W Almquist

Abstract

To address the effects of increasing homeless populations, planners must understand the size and distribution of their homeless populations, as well as how information and resources are diffused throughout homeless communities. Currently, there is limited publicly available information on the homeless population, e.g. the estimates of the homeless, gathered annually by the US Housing & Urban Development point in time survey. While it is theorized in the literature that the networks of homeless individuals provide access to important information for planners in areas such as health (e.g. needle exchanges) or access (e.g. information diffusion about the location of new shelters), it is almost never measured, and if measured, only at a very small scale. This research addresses the question of how planners can leverage publicly available data on the homeless to better understand their own homeless networks (e.g. relations among the homeless themselves) in a cost-effective and reliable way. To this end, we provide a method for simulating realistic networks of a social relation among the homeless population and perform a diffusion analysis over the resultant homeless-to-homeless networks, and also over a simulated homeless youth Facebook network. We validate the former through novel use of historical data, while the latter is based on recent work that demonstrated that the homeless youth have similar size Facebook networks and usage. We see much stronger spatial hopping and quicker diffusion over the youth network, i.e. we expect information to pass among the youth network much faster than the homeless-to-homeless network. This finding implies that non-government organizations and public health efforts that seek to provide information, goods or services to the homeless should start with the homeless youth, given the potential for faster diffusion when homeless youth are the initial transmitters. Overall, these methods and analysis provide a unique opportunity for visualizing, characterizing and inferring information for large-scale and hard to measure social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Zack W Almquist, 2020. "Large-scale spatial network models: An application to modeling information diffusion through the homeless population of San Francisco," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 523-540, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:523-540
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808318785375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808318785375
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808318785375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Csáji, Balázs Cs. & Browet, Arnaud & Traag, V.A. & Delvenne, Jean-Charles & Huens, Etienne & Van Dooren, Paul & Smoreda, Zbigniew & Blondel, Vincent D., 2013. "Exploring the mobility of mobile phone users," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1459-1473.
    2. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 248-258, March.
    3. Krivitsky, Pavel N. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Fitting Latent Cluster Models for Networks with latentnet," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i05).
    4. Irwin, Jay & LaGory, Mark & Ritchey, Ferris & Fitzpatrick, Kevin, 2008. "Social assets and mental distress among the homeless: Exploring the roles of social support and other forms of social capital on depression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 1935-1943, December.
    5. Jukka-Pekka Onnela & Samuel Arbesman & Marta C González & Albert-László Barabási & Nicholas A Christakis, 2011. "Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-7, April.
    6. Zack Almquist & Carter T. Butts, 2012. "Point process models for household distributions within small areal units," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(22), pages 593-632.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon K. C. Cheung & Tommy K. Y. Cheung, 2022. "Mixed membership nearest neighbor model with feature difference," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1578-1594, December.
    2. Mary-Catherine Anderson & Ashley Hazel & Jessica M. Perkins & Zack W. Almquist, 2021. "The Ecology of Unsheltered Homelessness: Environmental and Social-Network Predictors of Well-Being among an Unsheltered Homeless Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruggero Bellio & Nicola Soriani, 2021. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Laplace approximation for p2 network regression models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(1), pages 24-41, February.
    2. Joshua Daniel Loyal & Yuguo Chen, 2020. "Statistical Network Analysis: A Review with Applications to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 419-440, August.
    3. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    4. Kayvan Sadeghi & Alessandro Rinaldo, 2020. "Hierarchical models for independence structures of networks," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 439-457, August.
    5. Jamie Olson & Kathleen Carley, 2013. "Exact and approximate EM estimation of mutually exciting hawkes processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 63-80, April.
    6. Tom A. B. Snijders & Christian E. G. Steglich, 2015. "Representing Micro–Macro Linkages by Actor-based Dynamic Network Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 222-271, May.
    7. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    8. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    9. Li, Jing & Yu, Qian & Ma, Ding, 2024. "Does China's high-speed rail network promote inter-city technology transfer? ——A multilevel network analysis based on the electronic information industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 11-24.
    10. Wang, Wenjun & Pan, Lin & Yuan, Ning & Zhang, Sen & Liu, Dong, 2015. "A comparative analysis of intra-city human mobility by taxi," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 134-147.
    11. Anna‐Maria Kindt & Matthias Geissler & Kilian Bühling, 2022. "Be my (little) partner?!—Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1274-1295, November.
    12. Stephen Matthews & Daniel M. Parker, 2013. "Progress in Spatial Demography," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(10), pages 271-312.
    13. De Nicola, Giacomo & Fritz, Cornelius & Mehrl, Marius & Kauermann, Göran, 2023. "Dependence matters: Statistical models to identify the drivers of tie formation in economic networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 351-363.
    14. Tom Broekel & Marcel Bednarz, 2018. "Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An Application of a Two-Mode STERGM to a Project-Based R&D Network in the German Biotechnology Industry," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 677-704, September.
    15. Duncan A. Clark & Mark S. Handcock, 2022. "Comparing the real‐world performance of exponential‐family random graph models and latent order logistic models for social network analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 566-587, April.
    16. SOHN Christophe & CHRISTOPOULOS Dimitris & KOSKINEN Johan, 2013. "Geography and social networks. Modelling the effects of territorial borders on policy networks," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-19, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    17. Alex Rutherford & Manuel Cebrian & Iyad Rahwan & Sohan Dsouza & James McInerney & Victor Naroditskiy & Matteo Venanzi & Nicholas R Jennings & J R deLara & Eero Wahlstedt & Steven U Miller, 2013. "Targeted Social Mobilization in a Global Manhunt," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    18. Sascha Holzhauer & Friedrich Krebs & Andreas Ernst, 2013. "Considering baseline homophily when generating spatial social networks for agent-based modelling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 128-150, June.
    19. Vincenzo Butticè & Diego Useche, 2022. "Crowdfunding to overcome the immigrant entrepreneurs’ liability of outsidership: the role of internal social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1519-1540, December.
    20. Vu, Duy & Aitkin, Murray, 2015. "Variational algorithms for biclustering models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:523-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.