IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v47y2020i3p363-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the relationships between urban form metrics and the vegetation biomass loss under urban expansion in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Zhang

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China)

  • Sophia Shuang Chen

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China)

  • Guangyu Li

Abstract

Compact urban form has been applied as a strategy to reduce the loss of green space that occurs from development, but the impact of this policy on the provision of green space still presents many uncertainties. This research investigated the statistical relationship between urban form indicators and the loss of vegetation biomass to understand the response of quality green space provision to changes in urban morphology. A methodology combining multi-source data assimilation, statistical analysis, and spatial analysis was adopted for the Yangtze River Delta cities of China. First, six urban metrics were selected to describe the shape and layout of urban patches in each city, and the total biomass loss index was then introduced as a parameter. The values of urban metrics and total biomass loss index were calculated for the 50 Yangtze River Delta cities. Second, ordinary least squares regression and geographically weighted regression analyses were then used to establish a quantitative relationship between total biomass loss index and urban form indicators. The results revealed an extremely negative correlation between total biomass loss index and the three urban variables of Richard compactness, density gradient, and the Gini coefficient; moreover, the parameter estimates for the three variables in the geographically weighted regression model were local and varied over space. Third, the mechanisms by which the urban form influences biomass loss were discussed and different urban form planning strategies for particular urban areas were suggested. In conclusion, compact urban form in a clustered layout of urban areas with a dense central agglomeration was verified to be ecologically superior and conducive to green space protection. For the physical interpretation of the statistical relationship between urban morphology and vegetation loss, the interface effect of urban agglomeration on vegetation merits further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Zhang & Sophia Shuang Chen & Guangyu Li, 2020. "Exploring the relationships between urban form metrics and the vegetation biomass loss under urban expansion in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 363-380, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:363-380
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808318816993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808318816993
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808318816993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brueckner, Jan K & Fansler, David A, 1983. "The Economics of Urban Sprawl: Theory and Evidence on the Spatial Sizes of Cities," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 65(3), pages 479-482, August.
    2. Sun, Ranhao & Chen, Liding, 2017. "Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: Mitigation and diversification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 38-46.
    3. Tao, Yu & Li, Feng & Liu, Xusheng & Zhao, Dan & Sun, Xiao & Xu, Lianfang, 2015. "Variation in ecosystem services across an urbanization gradient: A study of terrestrial carbon stocks from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 210-216.
    4. Raymond Bunker, 2014. "How Is the Compact City Faring in Australia?," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 449-460, October.
    5. Patrick Rérat, 2012. "Housing, the Compact City and Sustainable Development: Some Insights From Recent Urban Trends in Switzerland," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 115-136.
    6. Wei Song & Xiangzheng Deng, 2015. "Effects of Urbanization-Induced Cultivated Land Loss on Ecosystem Services in the North China Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Clifford M. Hurvich & Jeffrey S. Simonoff & Chih‐Ling Tsai, 1998. "Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 271-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anqi Zhang & Weifeng Li & Jiayu Wu & Jian Lin & Jianqun Chu & Chang Xia, 2021. "How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1245-1262, June.
    2. Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2021. "Going Green and Going Dense: A Systematic Review of Compatibilities and Conflicts in Urban Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Lingyue Li & Zhixin Qi & Teng Zhong, 2021. "Forest Transition and Its Dynamics in Subtropical Chongqing, China since 1990s," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    2. Don Harding, 2010. "Applying shape and phase restrictions in generalized dynamic categorical models of the business cycle," NCER Working Paper Series 58, National Centre for Econometric Research.
    3. Michael S. Delgado & Daniel J. Henderson & Christopher F. Parmeter, 2014. "Does Education Matter for Economic Growth?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(3), pages 334-359, June.
    4. Cavicchia, Rebecca, 2023. "Housing accessibility in densifying cities: Entangled housing and land use policy limitations and insights from Oslo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Meng Wang & Aleksandra Krstikj & Huan Liu, 2022. "Planning Compact City in Rapidly Growing Cities—An Estimation of the Effects of New-Type Urbanization Planning in Hangzhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Juan Manuel Julio & Norberto Rodríguez & Héctor Manuel Zárate, 2005. "Estimating the COP Exchange Rate Volatility Smile and the Market Effect of Central Bank Interventions: A CHARN Approach," Borradores de Economia 2605, Banco de la Republica.
    7. Malloy, Elizabeth J. & Spiegelman, Donna & Eisen, Ellen A., 2009. "Comparing measures of model selection for penalized splines in Cox models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2605-2616, May.
    8. Robert W. Wassmer, 2002. "Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1307-1327, July.
    9. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Jędrzej Białkowski & Sheridan Titman & Garry Twite, 2023. "The Determinants of Office Cap Rates: The International Evidence," Working Papers in Economics 23/01, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    11. Karimu, Amin & Brännlund, Runar, 2013. "Functional form and aggregate energy demand elasticities: A nonparametric panel approach for 17 OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 19-27.
    12. Liao, Jun & Zou, Guohua, 2020. "Corrected Mallows criterion for model averaging," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. SangHyeok Lee & Donghyun Kim, 2022. "Multidisciplinary Understanding of the Urban Heating Problem and Mitigation: A Conceptual Framework for Urban Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Jeon, Jae Sik, 2019. "How housing market responds to greenbelt relaxation: Case of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 328-334.
    15. Lu, Jun & Lin, Lu, 2018. "Feature screening for multi-response varying coefficient models with ultrahigh dimensional predictors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 242-254.
    16. Chu, Chi-Yang & Henderson, Daniel J. & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2017. "On discrete Epanechnikov kernel functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 79-105.
    17. Jędrzej Białkowski & Sheridan Titman & Garry Twite, 2023. "The determinants of office cap rates: The international evidence," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(3), pages 539-572, May.
    18. Hailu, Yohannes G. & Brown, Cheryl, 2007. "Regional Growth Impacts on Agricultural Land Development: A Spatial Model for Three States," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 36(01), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Salvatore Ingrassia & Simona Minotti & Giorgio Vittadini, 2012. "Local Statistical Modeling via a Cluster-Weighted Approach with Elliptical Distributions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 29(3), pages 363-401, October.
    20. Maria Sassi, 2010. "OLS and GWR Approaches to Agricultural Convergence in the EU-15," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 16(1), pages 96-108, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:363-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.