IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v40y2013i5p829-845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategically Robust Urban Planning? A Demonstration of Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Goodings Swartz

    (Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • P Christopher Zegras

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

Abstract

Planning for the future is inherently risky. In most systems, exogenous driving forces affect any strategy's performance. Uncertainty about the state of those driving forces requires strategies that perform well in the face of a range of possible, even improbable, future conditions. This study formalizes the relationship between different methods proposed in the literature for rigorously exploring possible futures and then develops and applies the computational technique of scenario discovery to the policy option of a subsidy for low-income households in downtown Lisbon. The work demonstrates one way in which urban models can be applied to identify robust urban development strategies. Using the UrbanSim model, we offer the first known example of applying computational scenario-discovery techniques to the urban realm. We construct scenarios from combinations of values for presumed exogenous variables—population growth rate, employment growth rate, gas prices, and construction costs—using a Latin-hypercube-sample experimental design. We then data mine the resulting alternative futures to identify scenarios in which an example policy fails to achieve its goals. This demonstration of concept aims to lead to a new practical application of integrated urban models in a way that quantitatively tests the strategic robustness of urban interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Goodings Swartz & P Christopher Zegras, 2013. "Strategically Robust Urban Planning? A Demonstration of Concept," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 829-845, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:829-845
    DOI: 10.1068/b38135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b38135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b38135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 1997. "Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 48-57, May.
    2. David A. Weisbach, 2011. "Carbon Taxation in the EU: Expanding EU Carbon Price," Working Papers 1115, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    3. Rodier, Caroline J. & Johnston, Robert A., 2002. "Uncertain socioeconomic projections used in travel demand and emissions models: could plausible errors result in air quality nonconformity?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 613-631, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2015. "Cultural Diversity: A Matter of Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 8782, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Maurizio d’Amato, 2007. "Comparing Rough Set Theory with Multiple Regression Analysis as Automated Valuation Methodologies," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 42-65.
    3. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    4. Gerard Jong & Andrew Daly & Marits Pieters & Stephen Miller & Ronald Plasmeijer & Frank Hofman, 2007. "Uncertainty in traffic forecasts: literature review and new results for The Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 375-395, July.
    5. Alessandro Scuderi & Luisa Sturiale & Giuseppe Timpanaro & Agata Matarazzo & Silvia Zingale & Paolo Guarnaccia, 2022. "A Model to Support Sustainable Resource Management in the “Etna River Valleys” Biosphere Reserve: The Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Si-Hui Dong & Hui-Cheng Zhou & Hai-Jun Xu, 2004. "A Forecast Model of Hydrologic Single Element Medium and Long-Period Based on Rough Set Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(5), pages 483-495, October.
    7. Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Zongrun & Quan, Pei & Shi, Yong, 2024. "A semi-supervised concept-cognitive computing system for dynamic classification decision making with limited feedback information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1123-1138.
    8. Aguas, Oriana & Bachmann, Chris, 2022. "Assessing the effects of input uncertainties on the outputs of a freight demand model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Gülgönül Bozoğlu Batı & İsmail Hakkı Armutlulu, 2020. "Work and family conflict analysis of female entrepreneurs in Turkey and classification with rough set theory," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Vespermann, Jan & Wald, Andreas, 2011. "Much Ado about Nothing? – An analysis of economic impacts and ecologic effects of the EU-emission trading scheme in the aviation industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1066-1076.
    11. Chen, Li-Fei & Tsai, Chih-Tsung, 2016. "Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: A case study of a restaurant chain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 197-206.
    12. Kiluk, S., 2014. "Dynamic classification system in large-scale supervision of energy efficiency in buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Ching-Hsue Cheng & Ssu-Hsiang Wang, 2015. "A quarterly time-series classifier based on a reduced-dimension generated rules method for identifying financial distress," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 1979-1994, December.
    14. Junyi Wu & Shari Shang, 2020. "Managing Uncertainty in AI-Enabled Decision Making and Achieving Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Gift Dumedah & Nadine Schuurman, 2008. "Minimizing the effects of inaccurate sediment description in borehole data using rough sets and transition probability," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 291-315, September.
    16. Suresh Dara & Haider Banka & Chandra Sekhara Rao Annavarapu, 2017. "A Rough Based Hybrid Binary PSO Algorithm for Flat Feature Selection and Classification in Gene Expression Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 341-360, September.
    17. Salling, Kim Bang & Leleur, Steen, 2011. "Transport appraisal and Monte Carlo simulation by use of the CBA-DK model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 236-245, January.
    18. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.
    19. David L. Ryan & Junaid Bin Jahangir, 2013. "Are There Realistic Possibilities for a Higher "Batting" Average? On Improving Residential Energy Efficiency in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(s2), pages 125-142, August.
    20. Min-Hsiung Wei & Ching-Hsue Cheng & Chung-Shih Huang & Po-Chang Chiang, 2013. "Discovering medical quality of total hip arthroplasty by rough set classifier with imbalanced class," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1761-1779, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:829-845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.