IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v40y2013i1p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Width: An Indispensable Factor in Selection of Emergency Exit Door

Author

Listed:
  • Chengyu Sun

    (Tongji University, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Room B219, Si Ping Road 1239, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Bauke de Vries

    (Eindhoven University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Design Systems Group-VRT 9.10, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Predicting evacuees' exit-door selection is important for architects and fire engineers. Existing models used in fire prescription and evacuation simulation assume that the distance from an evacuee to an exit door is the dominant geometric factor. However, evacuation validation studies and architectural theories suggest the existence of other factors. An exit-door-selection model was built in a virtual environment covering six geometric exit-door attributes. The impacts of these attributes were surveyed quantitatively using 187 participants. The results indicate that the attribute width is an indispensable factor in the selection. It is the strongest positive factor with the feasibility to control architectural design that can compete or balance with the negative attribute distance in exit-door selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengyu Sun & Bauke de Vries, 2013. "Width: An Indispensable Factor in Selection of Emergency Exit Door," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(1), pages 63-77, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:1:p:63-77
    DOI: 10.1068/b37024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b37024
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b37024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golledge, Reginald G., 1995. "Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jn5r27v, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bill Hillier, 2012. "Studying Cities to Learn about Minds: Some Possible Implications of Space Syntax for Spatial Cognition," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(1), pages 12-32, February.
    2. Manley, Ed & Cheng, Tao, 2018. "Exploring the role of spatial cognition in predicting urban traffic flow through agent-based modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 14-23.
    3. M. Teimouri & M.R. Delavar & S.H. Chavoshi & M.R. Malek & N. Van de Weghe & T. Neutens & H.H. Hochmair, 2015. "Accommodating user preferences in ad hoc shared ride trip planning using GIS," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 816-831, October.
    4. Pat Burnett, 2008. "Variable Decision Strategies, Rational Choice, and Situation-Related Travel Demand," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(9), pages 2259-2281, September.
    5. Kwan, Mei-Po & Golledge, Reginald G. & Speigle, Jon, 1996. "Information Representation for Driver Decision Support Systems," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7zz0q3mw, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Jonathan L. Gifford, 2011. "Psychology and Rationality in User Behavior: The Case of Scarcity," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Kwan, Mei-Po & Golledge, Reginald G., 1996. "Computational Process Modeling of Disaggregate Travel Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt91f574zq, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2013. "The Personal City: The Experiential, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7014d9cg, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Hartwig H Hochmair, 2005. "Investigating the Effectiveness of the Least-Angle Strategy for Wayfinding in Unknown Street Networks," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(5), pages 673-691, October.
    10. Guo, Zhan, 2011. "Mind the map! The impact of transit maps on path choice in public transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 625-639, August.
    11. Alasdair Turner & Alan Penn, 2002. "Encoding Natural Movement as an Agent-Based System: An Investigation into Human Pedestrian Behaviour in the Built Environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(4), pages 473-490, August.
    12. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2012. "The Personal City: The Experimental, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt67d5w48s, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Zhou, Jack & Golledge, Reginald, 1999. "A GPS-based Analysis Household Travel Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3zf8h075, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Golledge, Reginald G. & Zhou, Jianyu, 2001. "GPS-Based Tracking of Daily Activities," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jb438r2, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Golledge, Reginald G & Zhou, Jack, 1999. "A GPS-based Analysis of Household Travel Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3hg1f5nb, University of California Transportation Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:1:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.