IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v38y2015i7p816-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accommodating user preferences in ad hoc shared ride trip planning using GIS

Author

Listed:
  • M. Teimouri
  • M.R. Delavar
  • S.H. Chavoshi
  • M.R. Malek
  • N. Van de Weghe
  • T. Neutens
  • H.H. Hochmair

Abstract

Ad hoc shared ride trip planning (SRTP) utilizes mobile devices, geo-sensors and wireless networks to match on-the-fly individual travel demand with transport supply. It represents one of many alternatives to single occupancy vehicle use. This paper outlines a SRTP approach via a two-phase algorithm based on user preferences in a time-dependent routing. Whereas current algorithms use minimization of travel time as the only optimization criterion in trip planning, in the framework presented here, the user can specify multiple trip preferences including travel time, walking time, number of transfers between cars and trip length. Various scenarios are simulated in the city of Tehran (Iran) to demonstrate how preference settings affect the routes of ad hoc shared journeys.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Teimouri & M.R. Delavar & S.H. Chavoshi & M.R. Malek & N. Van de Weghe & T. Neutens & H.H. Hochmair, 2015. "Accommodating user preferences in ad hoc shared ride trip planning using GIS," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 816-831, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:7:p:816-831
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2015.1059125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2015.1059125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2015.1059125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agatz, Niels A.H. & Erera, Alan L. & Savelsbergh, Martin W.P. & Wang, Xing, 2011. "Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1450-1464.
    2. Golledge, Reginald G., 1995. "Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jn5r27v, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2007. "The dial-a-ride problem: models and algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 29-46, September.
    4. Alessio Ishizaka & Markus Lusti, 2006. "How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 387-400, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masoud, Neda & Jayakrishnan, R., 2017. "A decomposition algorithm to solve the multi-hop Peer-to-Peer ride-matching problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-29.
    2. Stumpe, Miriam & Dieter, Peter & Schryen, Guido & Müller, Oliver & Beverungen, Daniel, 2024. "Designing taxi ridesharing systems with shared pick-up and drop-off locations: Insights from a computational study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Masoud, Neda & Jayakrishnan, R., 2017. "A real-time algorithm to solve the peer-to-peer ride-matching problem in a flexible ridesharing system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 218-236.
    4. Rui Yao & Shlomo Bekhor, 2021. "A Dynamic Tree Algorithm for Peer-to-Peer Ridesharing Matching," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 801-837, December.
    5. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    6. Bhoopalam, Anirudh Kishore & Agatz, Niels & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2018. "Planning of truck platoons: A literature review and directions for future research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 212-228.
    7. Zhan, Xingbin & Szeto, W.Y. & Shui, C.S. & Chen, Xiqun (Michael), 2021. "A modified artificial bee colony algorithm for the dynamic ride-hailing sharing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Mourad, Abood & Puchinger, Jakob & Chu, Chengbin, 2019. "A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 323-346.
    9. Sayarshad, Hamid R. & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2015. "A scalable non-myopic dynamic dial-a-ride and pricing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 539-554.
    10. Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai & Li, Xinwei & Wang, Hai & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 411-431.
    11. Hu, Shichun & Dessouky, Maged M. & Uhan, Nelson A. & Vayanos, Phebe, 2021. "Cost-sharing mechanism design for ride-sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 410-434.
    12. Kishore Bhoopalam, A. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2017. "Planning of Truck Platoons: a Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2017-010-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    14. Meng Li & Guowei Hua & Haijun Huang, 2018. "A Multi-Modal Route Choice Model with Ridesharing and Public Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Detti, Paolo & Papalini, Francesco & Lara, Garazi Zabalo Manrique de, 2017. "A multi-depot dial-a-ride problem with heterogeneous vehicles and compatibility constraints in healthcare," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Tafreshian, Amirmahdi & Masoud, Neda, 2022. "A truthful subsidy scheme for a peer-to-peer ridesharing market with incomplete information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 130-161.
    17. Shangyao Yan & Chun-Ying Chen & Chuan-Che Wu, 2012. "Solution methods for the taxi pooling problem," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 723-748, May.
    18. Dessouky, Maged M & Hu, Shichun, 2021. "Dynamic Routing for Ride-Sharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6qq8r7hz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Yue Guo & Fu Xin & Xiaotong Li, 2020. "The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 629-649, September.
    20. Timo Gschwind & Stefan Irnich, 2012. "Effective Handling of Dynamic Time Windows and Synchronization with Precedences for Exact Vehicle Routing," Working Papers 1211, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:7:p:816-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.