IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v38y2011i3p468-485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Carissa Schively Slotterback

    (Urban and Regional Planning Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 130 HHH Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)

Abstract

This study examined potential opportunities and constraints related to the development and deployment of technology in participation processes, including resources available, benefits and outcomes of technology, and technology implementation. On the basis of a survey of planners relative to eleven technology scenarios, varied access to staff, hardware, and software resources was reported. Potential perceived benefits of technology use included providing information and, to a lesser extent, fostering discussion and attracting additional participants. The findings suggest the greatest potential is for more basic technologies including websites that provide information, as opposed to more advanced technologies that would have greater potential to enhance collaborative and interactive participation approaches. Concerns about equitable access to technology for both planners and participants are also noted by survey respondents. The findings emphasize the importance of using technology as an enhancement to, rather than a replacement for, more traditional participation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Carissa Schively Slotterback, 2011. "Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 468-485, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:38:y:2011:i:3:p:468-485
    DOI: 10.1068/b36138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b36138
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b36138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shivanand Balram & Suzana Dragicevic & Thomas Meredith, 2003. "Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 365-394.
    2. Sarah A Elwood, 2002. "GIS Use in Community Planning: A Multidimensional Analysis of Empowerment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 905-922, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    2. Chiara Garau, 2012. "Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement with Online and Face-to-Face Participation—A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Rafael Hologa & Nils Riach, 2020. "Approaching Bike Hazards via Crowdsourcing of Volunteered Geographic Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Valérie Maquil & Ulrich Leopold & Luís Moreira Sousa & Lou Schwartz & Eric Tobias, 2018. "Towards a framework for geospatial tangible user interfaces in collaborative urban planning," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-206, April.
    5. Haozhi Pan & Si Chen & Yizhao Gao & Brian Deal & Jinfang Liu, 2020. "An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1456-1473, October.
    6. Julie Cidell, 2008. "Challenging the Contours: Critical Cartography, Local Knowledge, and the Public," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1202-1218, May.
    7. Kevin Ramsey, 2008. "A Call for Agonism: GIS and the Politics of Collaboration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2346-2363, October.
    8. Mahbubur R Meenar, 2017. "Using participatory and mixed-methods approaches in GIS to develop a Place-Based Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Index," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1181-1205, May.
    9. Hauck, Jennifer & Görg, Christoph & Varjopuro, Riku & Ratamäki, Outi & Maes, Joachim & Wittmer, Heidi & Jax, Kurt, 2013. "“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 25-32.
    10. Chiara Garau, 2012. "Citizen participation in public planning: A literature review," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 1(12), pages 21-44, December.
    11. Stelios Gialis & Polyzois Kanelleas, 2006. "Development of Geographical Information Systems Applications for Local Government Organizations: the Case of the Rhodes Municipality, Greece," ERSA conference papers ersa06p800, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Samuel F Dennis Jr, 2006. "Prospects for Qualitative GIS at the Intersection of Youth Development and Participatory Urban Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2039-2054, November.
    13. Van Hoesen, John & Letendre, Steven, 2010. "Evaluating potential renewable energy resources in Poultney, Vermont: A GIS-based approach to supporting rural community energy planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2114-2122.
    14. Daniel Stevens & Suzana Dragićević, 2007. "A GIS-Based Irregular Cellular Automata Model of Land-Use Change," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(4), pages 708-724, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:38:y:2011:i:3:p:468-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.