IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i4d10.1007_s11135-023-01815-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the usefulness of PPGIS for qualitative exploration of human relationships with places: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Rzeszewski

    (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan)

  • Tomasz Sowada

    (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan)

  • Jacek Kotus

    (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan)

Abstract

Participatory mapping (PM) in contemporary research has seen the proliferation of digital methods and methodologies, notably Public Participation Geographical Information Systems (PPGIS) and crowd mapping, together with extensive utilization of spatial concepts, including landscape, space, and place. This study delves into the potential of PPGIS and crowd mapping approaches to qualitatively investigate the concept of place. Our objective is to determine how data collected in large quantities in crowd mapping projects can serve as input for qualitative and mixed-method analyses of terms such as place meaning, place attachment, placemaking, and agency of place. We employed text data gathered through a custom geoquestionnaire to conduct a thematic analysis. The themes identified included examples of emotional and psychological aspects of human relations to place, descriptions of human-made and natural material qualities of locations. External experts evaluated the resulting themes and concurred that this kind of data is most helpful for analyzing a sense of place and least useful for an agency of place. We posit that PPGIS can uniquely augment place-based research through their provision of precise geospatial information. This characteristic enables researchers to employ both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, fostering a more comprehensive and nuanced exploration of place.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Rzeszewski & Tomasz Sowada & Jacek Kotus, 2024. "Assessing the usefulness of PPGIS for qualitative exploration of human relationships with places: an empirical study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3635-3654, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01815-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01815-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01815-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01815-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Little, 2020. "Engaging Youth in Placemaking: Modified Behavior Mapping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Sarah Gottwald & Jana Brenner & Christian Albert & Ron Janssen, 2021. "Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 1041-1056, November.
    3. Sarah A Elwood, 2002. "GIS Use in Community Planning: A Multidimensional Analysis of Empowerment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 905-922, May.
    4. Shmuel Shamai & Zinaida Ilatov, 2005. "Measuring Sense Of Place: Methodological Aspects," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(5), pages 467-476, December.
    5. Raymond, Christopher M. & Bryan, Brett A. & MacDonald, Darla Hatton & Cast, Andrea & Strathearn, Sarah & Grandgirard, Agnes & Kalivas, Tina, 2009. "Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1301-1315, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahbubur R Meenar, 2017. "Using participatory and mixed-methods approaches in GIS to develop a Place-Based Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Index," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1181-1205, May.
    2. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    3. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    4. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Larson, Silva & Stoeckl, Natalie & Neil, Barbara & Welters, Riccardo, 2013. "Using resident perceptions of values associated with the Australian Tropical Rivers to identify policy and management priorities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 9-18.
    6. Maciej Dobrzyñski & Krzysztof Dziekoñski & Arkadiusz Jurczuk, 2015. "Stakeholders Mapping - A Case Of International Logistics Project," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(2), pages 17-26, June.
    7. Raymond, Christopher M. & Kenter, Jasper O. & Plieninger, Tobias & Turner, Nancy J. & Alexander, Karen A., 2014. "Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-156.
    8. Sofía Monroy-Sais & Eduardo García-Frapolli & Francisco Mora & Margaret Skutsch & Alejandro Casas & Peter Rijnaldus Wilhelmus Gerritsen & David González-Jiménez, 2018. "Exploring How Land Tenure Affects Farmers’ Landscape Values: Evidence from a Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Vorstius, Anne Carolin & Spray, Christopher J., 2015. "A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 75-83.
    10. Wolf, Isabelle D. & Wohlfart, Teresa & Brown, Greg & Bartolomé Lasa, Abraham, 2015. "The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: A case study of mountain biking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 112-130.
    11. Alexandros Aristotelis Koupatsiaris & Hara Drinia, 2024. "Expanding Geoethics: Interrelations with Geoenvironmental Education and Sense of Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    12. Megan King & Vivian Renó & Evlyn Novo, 2014. "The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 681-698, May.
    13. Jun Hou & Tianlin Qin & Shanshan Liu & Jianwei Wang & Biqiong Dong & Sheng Yan & Hanjiang Nie, 2021. "Analysis and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Values Based on Land Use/Cover Change in the Yiluo River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Cultural Memories and Sense of Place in Historic Urban Landscapes: The Case of Masrah Al Salam, the Demolished Theatre Context in Alexandria, Egypt," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Schröter, Matthias & Kraemer, Roland & Mantel, Martin & Kabisch, Nadja & Hecker, Susanne & Richter, Anett & Neumeier, Veronika & Bonn, Aletta, 2017. "Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 80-94.
    16. Gould, Rachelle K. & Lincoln, Noa Kekuewa, 2017. "Expanding the suite of Cultural Ecosystem Services to include ingenuity, perspective, and life teaching," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 117-127.
    17. Márquez, Laura Andreina Matos & Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes & Machado, Karine Borges & Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins do & Castro, Joana D'arc Bardella & Nabout, João Carlos, 2023. "Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Carissa Schively Slotterback, 2011. "Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 468-485, June.
    19. Neyret, M. & Fischer, M. & Allan, E. & Hölzel, N. & Klaus, V.H. & Kleinebecker, T. & Krauss, J. & Le Provost, G. & Peter, S. & Schenk, N. & Simons, N.K. & van der Plas, F. & Binkenstein, J. & Börschig, 2021. "Assessing the impact of grassland management on landscape multifunctionality," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Wakita, Kazumi & Shen, Zhonghua & Oishi, Taro & Yagi, Nobuyuki & Kurokura, Hisashi & Furuya, Ken, 2014. "Human utility of marine ecosystem services and behavioural intentions for marine conservation in Japan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 53-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01815-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.