IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v34y2002i5p905-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS Use in Community Planning: A Multidimensional Analysis of Empowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah A Elwood

    (Department of Geography, DePaul University, Suite 2100, 990 West Fullerton Parkway, Chicago, IL 60614, USA)

Abstract

A growing body of research examining the social and political implications of geographic information systems (GIS) considers the extent to which the use of this technology may empower or disempower different actors and institutions. However, these studies have tended not to articulate a clear conceptualization of empowerment. Thus, in this paper, I develop a multidimensional conceptual framework for assessing empowerment (and disempowerment), and employ it in examining the impacts of GIS use by community-based organizations engaged in urban planning and neighborhood revitalization. Drawing on a case study conducted with a Minneapolis, Minnesota, neighborhood organization, I show how this multidimensional framework fosters a more complete analysis of empowerment, and therefore, development of a more detailed explanation of the impacts of this new technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah A Elwood, 2002. "GIS Use in Community Planning: A Multidimensional Analysis of Empowerment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 905-922, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:5:p:905-922
    DOI: 10.1068/a34117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a34117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a34117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S Openshaw, 1991. "A View on the GIS Crisis in Geography, or, Using GIS to Put Humpty-Dumpty Back Together Again," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(5), pages 621-628, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hauck, Jennifer & Görg, Christoph & Varjopuro, Riku & Ratamäki, Outi & Maes, Joachim & Wittmer, Heidi & Jax, Kurt, 2013. "“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 25-32.
    2. Carissa Schively Slotterback, 2011. "Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 468-485, June.
    3. Julie Cidell, 2008. "Challenging the Contours: Critical Cartography, Local Knowledge, and the Public," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1202-1218, May.
    4. Rafael Hologa & Nils Riach, 2020. "Approaching Bike Hazards via Crowdsourcing of Volunteered Geographic Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Stelios Gialis & Polyzois Kanelleas, 2006. "Development of Geographical Information Systems Applications for Local Government Organizations: the Case of the Rhodes Municipality, Greece," ERSA conference papers ersa06p800, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Kevin Ramsey, 2008. "A Call for Agonism: GIS and the Politics of Collaboration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2346-2363, October.
    7. Michal Rzeszewski & Tomasz Sowada & Jacek Kotus, 2024. "Assessing the usefulness of PPGIS for qualitative exploration of human relationships with places: an empirical study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3635-3654, August.
    8. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    9. Samuel F Dennis Jr, 2006. "Prospects for Qualitative GIS at the Intersection of Youth Development and Participatory Urban Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2039-2054, November.
    10. Van Hoesen, John & Letendre, Steven, 2010. "Evaluating potential renewable energy resources in Poultney, Vermont: A GIS-based approach to supporting rural community energy planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2114-2122.
    11. Mahbubur R Meenar, 2017. "Using participatory and mixed-methods approaches in GIS to develop a Place-Based Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Index," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1181-1205, May.
    12. Haozhi Pan & Si Chen & Yizhao Gao & Brian Deal & Jinfang Liu, 2020. "An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1456-1473, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D A Griffith & P R Pryde & N R Fyfe & S Warren & É Darier & J Rees & N AlSayyad & T Harvey & W Adams, 1997. "Reviews: Review Essay: Interactive Spatial Data Analysis, Environmental Security and Quality after Communism, Law, Space and the Geographies of Power, Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geograph," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(4), pages 747-760, April.
    2. R J Johnston & N J Thrift, 1993. "Ringing the Changes: The Intellectual History of Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 14-21, January.
    3. N J Thrift & R J Johnston, 1993. "The Futures of Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 83-102, January.
    4. S Openshaw, 1998. "Towards a More Computationally Minded Scientific Human Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(2), pages 317-332, February.
    5. P Williamson & M Birkin & P H Rees, 1998. "The Estimation of Population Microdata by Using Data from Small Area Statistics and Samples of Anonymised Records," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(5), pages 785-816, May.
    6. S Openshaw, 1993. "GIS ‘Crime’ and GIS ‘Criminality’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(4), pages 451-458, April.
    7. R Flowerdew, 1998. "Reacting to Ground Truth," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(2), pages 289-301, February.
    8. N/A, 1991. "Commentaries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(8), pages 1087-1094, August.
    9. Richard Harris & David O’Sullivan & Mark Gahegan & Martin Charlton & Lex Comber & Paul Longley & Chris Brunsdon & Nick Malleson & Alison Heppenstall & Alex Singleton & Daniel Arribas-Bel & Andy Evan, 2017. "More bark than bytes? Reflections on 21+ years of geocomputation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(4), pages 598-617, July.
    10. Matthew W Wilson & Mark Graham, 2013. "Situating Neogeography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 3-9, January.
    11. Marianna Pavlovskaya, 2006. "Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2003-2020, November.
    12. W A V Clark, 1993. "Applying our Understanding: Social Science in Government and the Marketplace," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 38-47, January.
    13. N/A, 1994. "Commentaries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(4), pages 499-508, April.
    14. Mei-Po Kwan & LaDona Knigge, 2006. "Doing Qualitative Research Using GIS: An Oxymoronic Endeavor?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 1999-2002, November.
    15. M A Crang & A C Hudson & S M Reimer & S J Hinchliffe, 1997. "Software for Qualitative Research: 1. Prospectus and Overview," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(5), pages 771-787, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:5:p:905-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.