IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v35y2008i5p847-862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game-Theoretic Approach to Urban Land Development in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Kung Lai

    (Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC)

  • Chengri Ding

    (National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, 1112L Preinkert Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Po-Chun Tsai
  • I-Chih Lan
  • Minsheng Xue
  • Ching-Pin Chiu

    (Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, 69, Section 2, Jianguo North Road, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC)

  • Li-Guo Wang

    (Department of Real Estate and Built Environment, National Taipei University, 67, Section 3, Min Sheng East Road, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC)

Abstract

The property rights approach to urban development has recently been proposed in the planning literature to explain how urban systems self-organize spatially and institutionally. The land-tenure system is one of the key factors affecting land use and thus urban development. It is not clear, however, how such a factor affects the process of urban development. This research aims to provide reasonable explanations as to how the land-tenure system in China in general affects urban development, by building game-theoretic models which include plans as a manifestation of information and property rights as a manifestation of land-use rights. Viewing regulated development as a collective good, the model is based on the prisoner's dilemma game, where the local government regulates and the developer makes development decisions. Preliminary results show that land rights in the transitional economy of China are of paramount importance and must be clearly specified in order to make the land development process efficient at reducing transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Kung Lai & Chengri Ding & Po-Chun Tsai & I-Chih Lan & Minsheng Xue & Ching-Pin Chiu & Li-Guo Wang, 2008. "A Game-Theoretic Approach to Urban Land Development in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(5), pages 847-862, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:5:p:847-862
    DOI: 10.1068/b34018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b34018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b34018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Webster & Lawrence W.-C. Lai, 2003. "Property Rights, Planning and Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2625, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claude Lacour & Sylvette Puissant, 2007. "Re-Urbanity: Urbanising the Rural and Ruralising the Urban," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 728-747, March.
    2. Ernest R. Alexander, 2015. "70 Years? Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 5-18.
    3. Francesco Minora, 2013. "Collective institutions towards habitability: roles, strategies and forms of governance," Euricse Working Papers 1352, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    4. Lawrence W C Lai & Valerius W C Kwong, 2012. "Racial Segregation by Legislative Zoning and Company Law: An Empirical Hong Kong Study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(3), pages 416-438, June.
    5. Paul A. Barter, 2015. "A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 136-156, July.
    6. Alison Brown & Colman Msoka & Ibrahima Dankoco, 2015. "A refugee in my own country: Evictions or property rights in the urban informal economy?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2234-2249, September.
    7. Stefano Moroni, 2014. "Towards a general theory of contractual communities: neither necessarily gated, nor a form of privatization," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 3, pages 38-65, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Stefano Moroni, 2011. "Land-use Regulation for the Creative City," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Shin Lee & Jong Gook Seo & Chris Webster, 2006. "The Decentralising Metropolis: Economic Diversity and Commuting in the US Suburbs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(13), pages 2525-2549, December.
    11. Deborah Peel & Greg Lloyd & Alex Lord, 2007. "Business Improvement Districts and the Discourse of Contractualism," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 401-422, July.
    12. Jill Grant & Lindsey Mittelsteadt, 2004. "Types of Gated Communities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(6), pages 913-930, December.
    13. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    14. Shih-Kung Lai, 2006. "A Spatial Garbage-Can Model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(1), pages 141-156, February.
    15. J. Peter Clinch & Eoin O'Neill, 2010. "Assessing the Relative Merits of Development Charges and Transferable Development Rights in an Uncertain World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 891-911, April.
    16. Amir Hefetz & Mildred E Warner & Eran Vigoda-Gadot, 2012. "Privatization and Intermunicipal Contracting: The US Local Government Experience 1992–2007," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 675-692, August.
    17. Deng, Feng, 2008. "What Is “Open”? An Economic Analysis of Open Institutions," MPRA Paper 8888, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Peter Gordon Sanford Ikeda, 2012. "Does Density Matter?," Working Paper 8957, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    19. Elizabeth Taylor, 2014. ""Fight the towers! Or kiss your car park goodbye": How often do residents assert car parking rights in Melbourne planning appeals?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 328-348, September.
    20. Evgeniya Bobkova & Meta Berghauser Pont & Lars Marcus, 2021. "Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: Quantitative profile of five European cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 604-620, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:5:p:847-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.