IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v39y2012i3p416-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Segregation by Legislative Zoning and Company Law: An Empirical Hong Kong Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence W C Lai
  • Valerius W C Kwong

Abstract

In this paper we employ readily available categories of public data, rarely used in the literature on racial segregation, to scrutinise three research questions about the proposition of Lai and Yu (2001 Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 295–314) that statutory zoning, which discriminates against a certain class of citizens, can be a form of price control. The key findings are that there was a large Chinese population on the Peak in Hong Kong even when the law did not allow Chinese people to own property there, that the process of acquiring European properties for residential purposes after the removal of the law was slow, and the Peak remained predominantly European until the 1980s. In other words, the factual evidence supports the argument that racially discriminatory zoning in the Peak District had not been predicated on racial animosity or aversion. The residential history of the Peak and another exclusively European housing enclave in Shek O established prewar under company law points towards the reality that the attempt to prevent the Chinese from buying properties in certain areas of Hong Kong was driven by idiosyncratic demands for a particular housing style. These two case studies demonstrated that contractual planning is much more capable of preserving the character of a neighbourhood than obligatory planning by edict. Some economic reasons behind the resilience of planning by mutual agreement and their implications for sustainable development are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence W C Lai & Valerius W C Kwong, 2012. "Racial Segregation by Legislative Zoning and Company Law: An Empirical Hong Kong Study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(3), pages 416-438, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:3:p:416-438
    DOI: 10.1068/b37032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b37032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b37032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert H. Nelson, 2000. "Collective private ownership of American housing:a social revolution in local governance," ICER Working Papers 09-2000, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    2. Frank T. Lorne, 2009. "Macro-entrepreneurship and sustainable development: the need for innovative solutions for promoting win-win interactions," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 10(2), pages 69-85, June.
    3. Ben Yu & Daigee Shaw & Tsu-Tan Fu & Lawrence Lai, 2000. "Property rights and contractual approach to sustainable development," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 3(3), pages 291-309, September.
    4. Chris Webster & Lawrence W.-C. Lai, 2003. "Property Rights, Planning and Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2625.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence W C Lai & Connie W Y Hung, 2008. "The Inner Logic of the Coase Theorem and a Coasian Planning Research Agenda," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(2), pages 207-226, April.
    2. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Davies, Stephen N.G. & Chan, Edwin H.W. & Chua, Mark Hansley & Lin, C.L., 2020. "The production and consumption of land use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Lawrence Lai, 2011. "Commentary: Journey through Six Property Rights Stories along the Pacific Rim," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 589-594, February.
    4. Lawrence W.C. Lai, 2020. "Sustainable development of heritage conservation and tourism: A Hong Kong case study on colonial heritage," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1181-1188, September.
    5. Frank Lorne, 2009. "Macro-entrepreneurship and sustainable development: the need for innovative solutions for promoting win-win interactions," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 10(2), pages 69-85, June.
    6. Claude Lacour & Sylvette Puissant, 2007. "Re-Urbanity: Urbanising the Rural and Ruralising the Urban," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 728-747, March.
    7. Ernest R. Alexander, 2015. "70 Years? Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 5-18.
    8. Francesco Minora, 2013. "Collective institutions towards habitability: roles, strategies and forms of governance," Euricse Working Papers 1352, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    9. Paul A. Barter, 2015. "A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 136-156, July.
    10. Alison Brown & Colman Msoka & Ibrahima Dankoco, 2015. "A refugee in my own country: Evictions or property rights in the urban informal economy?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2234-2249, September.
    11. Stefano Moroni, 2014. "Towards a general theory of contractual communities: neither necessarily gated, nor a form of privatization," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 3, pages 38-65, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Stefano Moroni, 2011. "Land-use Regulation for the Creative City," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Chau, K.W. & Davies, Stephen N.G. & Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Lennon, H.T. Choy, 2023. "Museums for ex situ tangible heritage conservation: A neo-institutional analytical and empirical economic analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Shin Lee & Jong Gook Seo & Chris Webster, 2006. "The Decentralising Metropolis: Economic Diversity and Commuting in the US Suburbs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(13), pages 2525-2549, December.
    16. Deborah Peel & Greg Lloyd & Alex Lord, 2007. "Business Improvement Districts and the Discourse of Contractualism," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 401-422, July.
    17. Jill Grant & Lindsey Mittelsteadt, 2004. "Types of Gated Communities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(6), pages 913-930, December.
    18. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    19. Chen, Yi-Chieh & Dy, Kenneth Bicol & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2024. "Property rights arrangement and stakeholder networks hindering floating photovoltaics: A case of private open-access ponds in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Shih-Kung Lai, 2006. "A Spatial Garbage-Can Model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(1), pages 141-156, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:3:p:416-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.