IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v23y1996i6p749-770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Needs the Internet? Computer-Mediated Communication in Design Firms

Author

Listed:
  • R D Coyne

    (Department of Architecture, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH1 1JZ, Scotland)

  • F Sudweeks
  • D Haynes

Abstract

We examine how the introduction of computer-mediated communications technologies, such as the Internet, affect design firms. We interviewed a diverse sample of the small but growing number of practitioners from around the world who use the Internet in their day-to-day operations. The interviews were conducted using the Internet. We found that certain firms are redefining themselves in terms of their entrepreneurial endeavours, as processors of texts, as collaborators, and as players in the global arena. We discuss these phenomena in the light of the philosophical consideration of the way technologies disclose features of a firm's practices. Disclosure displaces need as the means of understanding the relationship between technology and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • R D Coyne & F Sudweeks & D Haynes, 1996. "Who Needs the Internet? Computer-Mediated Communication in Design Firms," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 23(6), pages 749-770, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:23:y:1996:i:6:p:749-770
    DOI: 10.1068/b230749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b230749
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b230749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valacich, Joseph S. & Dennis, Alan R. & Connolly, Terry, 1994. "Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 448-467, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Antoinette L. & Murthy, Uday S. & Engle, Terry J., 2012. "Why computer-mediated communication improves the effectiveness of fraud brainstorming," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 334-356.
    2. M den Hengst & G-J de Vreede & R Maghnouji, 2007. "Using soft OR principles for collaborative simulation: a case study in the Dutch airline industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 669-682, May.
    3. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2008. "On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 403-420, September.
    4. Fraidin, Samuel N., 2004. "When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 102-113, March.
    5. Benbasat, Izak & Lim, John, 2000. "Information Technology Support For Debiasing Group Judgments: An Empirical Evaluation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 167-183, September.
    6. McGlynn, Richard P. & McGurk, Dennis & Effland, Vicki Sprague & Johll, Nancy L. & Harding, Deborah J., 2004. "Brainstorming and task performance in groups constrained by evidence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 75-87, January.
    7. J. H. Jung & Christoph Schneider & Joseph Valacich, 2010. "Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 724-742, April.
    8. David S. Kerr & Uday S. Murthy, 2004. "Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 381-399, July.
    9. Edward Christensen & Jerry Fjermestad, 1997. "Challenging Group Support Systems Research: The Case for Strategic Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 351-372, July.
    10. Wolfgang Stroebe & Bernard A. Nijstad & Eric F. Rietzschel, 2014. "Beyond Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: The Evolution of a Question," CREMA Working Paper Series 2014-05, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    11. Benjamin O. Abongo* & Dr. Thomas Senaji & Dr. Nancy Rintari, 2019. "Policy Interventions to Contemporary Challenges and the Performance of Insurance Companies in Kenya a Case Study of Jubilee Insurance Company," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 61-77, 03-2019.
    12. Olivier Toubia & Laurent Florès, 2007. "Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 342-360, 05-06.
    13. Olivier Toubia, 2006. "Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 411-425, September.
    14. Paulus, Paul B. & Yang, Huei-Chuan, 2000. "Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 76-87, May.
    15. Brian E. Mennecke & Joseph S. Valacich & Bradley C. Wheeler, 2000. "The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(6), pages 507-529, November.
    16. Wm. Benjamin Martz & Morgan M. Shepherd, 2002. "Using and Influence Level of Information to Explain the Non-consensus Process Loss," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 281-291, July.
    17. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2013. "Putting Quality First in Ideation Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 943-973, September.
    18. Kerr, David S. & Murthy, Uday S., 2009. "Beyond brainstorming: The effectiveness of computer-mediated communication for convergence and negotiation tasks," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 245-262.
    19. David Kocsis & Triparna Vreede & Abdulrahman Alothaim, 2022. "Happy to Continue: Satisfaction, Commitment, and Persistence to Use Technology-Supported Collaborative Work Practices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1235-1262, December.
    20. Yossi Maaravi & Ben Heller & Yael Shoham & Shay Mohar & Baruch Deutsch, 2021. "Ideation in the digital age: literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1431-1464, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:23:y:1996:i:6:p:749-770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.