IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v19y1992i3p317-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Water-Balance Simulation and Multiobjective Programming: Land-Use Plan Design in Hawaii

Author

Listed:
  • M A Ridgley
  • T W Giambelluca

Abstract

In the Hawaiian Islands, planners and public officials have decided recently to raise the permissible level of urban development in central Oahu. The decision is opposed by many on the grounds that it threatens agricultural land as well as the sustainability of groundwater supply. A two-part procedure is presented for exploring the impacts of such development and designing urban-expansion patterns that minimize them. First, a water-balance simulation model is used to calculate groundwater recharge as it varies with land use and location within the area. The difference between recharge and withdrawal is computed, and any changes are then estimated for different land uses. This information is then incorporated into optimization models having objectives related to agricultural land retention, groundwater balance, and residential population growth. The models generate alternative land-use expansion plans and show the trade-offs among objectives. The consideration of slightly suboptimal (dominated) solutions allows a significant expansion in the range of such alternatives. The results suggest that, if future agricultural development does not occur on currently nonagricultural land, then both agricultural land and groundwater sustainability will suffer significant adverse effects under the new population limits.

Suggested Citation

  • M A Ridgley & T W Giambelluca, 1992. "Linking Water-Balance Simulation and Multiobjective Programming: Land-Use Plan Design in Hawaii," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 19(3), pages 317-336, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:19:y:1992:i:3:p:317-336
    DOI: 10.1068/b190317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b190317
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b190317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1990. "An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 259-268, March.
    2. Arthur M. Geoffrion, 1976. "The Purpose of Mathematical Programming is Insight, Not Numbers," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 81-92, November.
    3. E. Downey Brill, Jr. & Shoou-Yuh Chang & Lewis D. Hopkins, 1982. "Modeling to Generate Alternatives: The HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 221-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    2. Lee, Heeseok & Shi, Yong & Nazem, Sufi M. & Yeol Kang, Sung & Ho Park, Tae & Ho Sohn, Myung, 2001. "Multicriteria hub decision making for rural area telecommunication networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 483-495, September.
    3. Tim T. Pedersen & Mikael Skou Andersen & Marta Victoria & Gorm B. Andresen, 2021. "30.000 ways to reach 55% decarbonization of the European electricity sector," Papers 2112.07247, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    4. Boukherroub, Tasseda & LeBel, Luc & Ruiz, Angel, 2017. "A framework for sustainable forest resource allocation: A Canadian case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 224-235.
    5. van den Burg, A.J. & van der Ham, R.T. & Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1977. "Generalizations of simulation results : Practicality of statistical methods (Part one)," Research Memorandum FEW 67, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Entani, Tomoe & Sugihara, Kazutomi, 2012. "Uncertainty index based interval assignment by Interval AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 379-385.
    7. Calderon-Monge, Esther & Pastor-Sanz, Iván & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "How to select franchisees: A model proposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 676-684.
    8. James F. Campbell, 2017. "Comments on: Continuous approximation models in freight distribution management," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 434-437, October.
    9. James G. Dolan & Donald R. Bordley, 1994. "Isoniazid Prophylaxis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, February.
    10. S-Y Chang & S-L Liaw, 1984. "Evaluation of Methods for Generating Alternatives to Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 325-337, September.
    11. Chen, Thomas Ying-Jeh & Guikema, Seth David & Daly, Craig Michael, 2019. "Optimal pipe inspection paths considering inspection tool limitations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-166.
    12. Huang, Rongbing & Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Kim, Seokjin, 2012. "The impact of cost uncertainty on the location of a distribution center," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 401-407.
    13. Zahir, Sajjad, 1999. "Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 373-396, January.
    14. Deb Kumar Maity & Sujit Mandal, 2019. "Identification of groundwater potential zones of the Kumari river basin, India: an RS & GIS based semi-quantitative approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1013-1034, April.
    15. Konstantinos Kokkinos & Vayos Karayannis, 2020. "Supportiveness of Low-Carbon Energy Technology Policy Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methodologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    17. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.
    18. Makowski, David & Hendrix, Eligius M. T. & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rossing, Walter A. H., 2001. "Generation and presentation of nearly optimal solutions for mixed-integer linear programming, applied to a case in farming system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 425-438, July.
    19. Gerald G. Brown & Richard E. Rosenthal, 2008. "Optimization Tradecraft: Hard-Won Insights from Real-World Decision Support," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 356-366, October.
    20. Leung, Lawrence C. & Cao, Dong, 2001. "On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 39-49, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:19:y:1992:i:3:p:317-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.