IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v11y1984i3p325-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Methods for Generating Alternatives to Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems

Author

Listed:
  • S-Y Chang
  • S-L Liaw

Abstract

Optimization models for complex regional planning problems can be used to generate planning alternatives that are good with respect to the objectives included in the models, but significantly different from each other with respect to the decisions specified, in order to provide more insight and understanding for the analyst or decisionmaker. The objectives of the study are (1) to develop a methodology for the evaluation of a modeling-to-generate-alternatives (MGA) method, and (2) to test systematically the MGA methods for generating planning alternatives that are good and different. A regional wastewater treatment system problem, which is formulated as a mixed integer programming model, is used as an example. Solutions that are feasible and meet the specified cost target among all possible combinations of treatment plant locations are identified as the base population. Cluster analysis is then performed to allocate these solutions into a set of mutually exclusive groups. Each of the MGA methods is used to generate several sets of solutions and is evaluated on the basis of the percentage coverage of the groups of the base population. This criterion provides a further assessment of the use of these MGA methods.

Suggested Citation

  • S-Y Chang & S-L Liaw, 1984. "Evaluation of Methods for Generating Alternatives to Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 325-337, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:11:y:1984:i:3:p:325-337
    DOI: 10.1068/b110325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b110325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b110325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon C. Liebman, 1976. "Some Simple-Minded Observations on the Role of Optimization in Public Systems Decision-Making," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 102-108, August.
    2. E. Downey Brill, Jr. & Shoou-Yuh Chang & Lewis D. Hopkins, 1982. "Modeling to Generate Alternatives: The HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 221-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S R Kshirsagar & E D Brill Jr, 1984. "Ideation and Evaluation Methods Applied to Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-324, September.
    2. Joseph F. DeCarolis & Samaneh Babaee & Binghui Li & Suyash Kanungo, 2019. "Energy Scenario Exploration with Modeling to Generate Alternatives (MGA)," Papers 1912.03788, arXiv.org.
    3. P Compagnoni, 1986. "An Environmental Planning Method for Australian Jurisdictions? Comments on the SIRO-PLAN/LUPLAN Schema," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 13(3), pages 335-344, September.
    4. Julian Yeomans, 2011. "Efficient generation of alternative perspectives in public environmental policy formulation: applying co-evolutionary simulation–optimization to municipal solid waste management," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 391-413, December.
    5. Tim T. Pedersen & Mikael Skou Andersen & Marta Victoria & Gorm B. Andresen, 2021. "30.000 ways to reach 55% decarbonization of the European electricity sector," Papers 2112.07247, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    6. Chen, Thomas Ying-Jeh & Guikema, Seth David & Daly, Craig Michael, 2019. "Optimal pipe inspection paths considering inspection tool limitations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-166.
    7. Makowski, David & Hendrix, Eligius M. T. & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rossing, Walter A. H., 2001. "Generation and presentation of nearly optimal solutions for mixed-integer linear programming, applied to a case in farming system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 425-438, July.
    8. B Rubenstein-Montano & I Zandi, 1999. "Application of a Genetic Algorithm to Policy Planning: The Case of Solid Waste," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(6), pages 893-907, December.
    9. Berntsen, Philip B. & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2017. "Ensuring diversity of national energy scenarios: Bottom-up energy system model with Modeling to Generate Alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 886-898.
    10. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. L D Hopkins, 1984. "Evaluation of Methods for Exploring Ill-Defined Problems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 339-348, September.
    12. R A Gerrard & R L Church, 1995. "A General Construct for the Zonally Constrained p-Median Problem," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 22(2), pages 213-236, April.
    13. William L. Hargrove & Josiah M. Heyman, 2020. "A Comprehensive Process for Stakeholder Identification and Engagement in Addressing Wicked Water Resources Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Abdulkadri, Abdullahi O. & Ajibefun, Igbekele A., 1998. "Developing alternative farm plans for cropping system decision making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 431-442, April.
    15. Dubois, Antoine & Dumas, Jonathan & Thiran, Paolo & Limpens, Gauthier & Ernst, Damien, 2023. "Multi-objective near-optimal necessary conditions for multi-sectoral planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    16. Richard L Church & Carlos A Baez, 2020. "Generating optimal and near-optimal solutions to facility location problems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(6), pages 1014-1030, July.
    17. Jing, Rui & Kuriyan, Kamal & Kong, Qingyuan & Zhang, Zhihui & Shah, Nilay & Li, Ning & Zhao, Yingru, 2019. "Exploring the impact space of different technologies using a portfolio constraint based approach for multi-objective optimization of integrated urban energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Urban land use and transportation planning for climate change mitigation: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 604-616.
    19. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2023. "Cost-effective options and regional interdependencies of reaching a low-carbon European electricity system in 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:11:y:1984:i:3:p:325-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.