IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v43y2011i2p286-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Another Washington-New York Consensus? Progressives Back in Contention

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Indergaard

    (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, St. John's University, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Jamaica, NY 11439, USA)

Abstract

I use the case of New York to explore how federal activism in the wake of crisis affects US urban regimes. Multiscalar policy networks , formerly used to extend neoliberalism to subnational levels, now feature an odd mix of progressives and neoliberals. I use the idea of path dependence to explain this indeterminacy in terms of the contradictory effects of US federalism on national regime formation: while federalism provided havens for progressives to mobilize for regime change, it also anchors defenders of neoliberalism and its legacies. The Obama administration has exploited crisis to move scalar relations in a progressive direction. This has brought some changes to New York's neoliberal regime. That, along with the White House's cool reaction to recent proposals from New York, suggest a break with the neoliberal apparatus. Yet neoliberal legacies constrain efforts to institutionalize new federal roles and scalar relations, leaving the New York regime unsettled. What seems the likely result is a heterodox national regime that combines state and market mechanisms and a policy network open to heterogeneous influences—a mix where progressives are back in contention, if not necessarily in control.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Indergaard, 2011. "Another Washington-New York Consensus? Progressives Back in Contention," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 286-306, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:2:p:286-306
    DOI: 10.1068/a43148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a43148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a43148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie Peck, 2002. "Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 331-360, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Anders Whitney & David López-García, 2023. "Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 600-616, May.
    2. Ugo Rossi & Arturo Di Bella, 2017. "Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 999-1018, May.
    3. Rahel Nüssli & Christian Schmid, 2016. "Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 679-701, May.
    4. Yong-Sook Lee & Eun-Jung Hwang, 2012. "Global Urban Frontiers through Policy Transfer? Unpacking Seoul’s Creative City Programmes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2817-2837, October.
    5. Xuefei Ren, 2017. "Land acquisition, rural protests, and the local state in China and India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 25-41, February.
    6. Xiaobo Su, 2012. "Transnational Regionalization and the Rescaling of the Chinese State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1327-1347, June.
    7. Graham Haughton & Rachel Naylor, 2008. "Reflexive Local and Regional Economic Development and International Policy Transfer," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(2), pages 167-178, May.
    8. Zhouying Song & Qiuhui Yao & Weidong Liu, 2024. "The Growth of Cross‐Border Regions Toward “Two Countries, One Park”: A Case Study of the Mohan–Boten Cross‐Border Cooperation Zone," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), December.
    9. Li Yu & Wei Xu, 2022. "Institutional conformity, entrepreneurial governance and local contingency: Problematizing central-local dynamics in localizing China's low-income housing policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 508-532, May.
    10. Adam Whitworth & Eleanor Carter, 2018. "Rescaling employment support accountability: From negative national neoliberalism to positively integrated city-region ecosystems," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 274-289, March.
    11. Evan Cleave & Godwin Arku, 2014. "Competitiveness through cooperation: Analysis of spatial patterns and inter-jurisdictional collaboration in the place branding of Ontario communities, Canada," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 541-560, June.
    12. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2005. "A Decade of Decentralisation? Assessing the Role of the Government Offices for the English Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1395-1412, August.
    13. Sue Brownill, 2007. "New Labour's Evolving Regeneration Policy: The Transition from the Single Regeneration Budget to the Single Pot in Oxford," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 22(3), pages 261-278, August.
    14. Fox Z Y Hu, 2005. "Deconstructing State-Owned Enterprises in Socialist China under Reform: A Scalar Examination," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(4), pages 703-722, April.
    15. Andrew Wood & Nick Phelps, 2018. "Towards a geography of intermediaries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1290-1294, September.
    16. Thaler, Thomas & Löschner, Lukas & Hartmann, Thomas, 2017. "The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations: Scalar reconstructions and transformation in Austria in flood risk management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 563-573.
    17. Hamedinger Alexander, 2014. "The Mobility and/or Fixity of Urban and Planning Policies – The Role of Divergent Urban Planning Cultures," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Tim Bunnell, 2015. "Antecedent Cities and Inter-referencing Effects: Learning from and Extending Beyond Critiques of Neoliberalisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(11), pages 1983-2000, August.
    19. Wenying Fu, 2024. "State infrastructural power through scalar practices: On China’s decarbonization endeavors," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 784-801, May.
    20. Joe Soss & Richard C. Fording & Sanford F. Schram, 2008. "The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 536-553, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:2:p:286-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.