IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i2p375-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing payments for ecosystem services hydrosocial territories through assemblage practices: China’s Xin’an river basin eco-compensation pilot

Author

Listed:
  • Jichuan Sheng
  • Xiao Han

Abstract

This study employs the case of China’s Xin’an River Basin Eco-compensation Pilot to explore how the payments for ecosystem services (PES) can configure local water control arenas through various assemblage practices. The findings demonstrate that specific assemblage practices can construct a PES hydrosocial territory, which often reflects power struggles. We argue that the dynamic assemblage practices redefine the boundaries of the PES hydrosocial territory and trigger the reconfiguration of PES scalar territory. Finally, we draw attention to the critical role that state intervention plays in constructing China’s PES hydrosocial territory, reflecting China’s remarkable governance rationality and technology. Therefore, beyond the existing interpretation of PES hydrosocial territory, the analysis of the remaking of the Xin’an River Basin has promoted the study of hydropolitics to understand better the role of assemblage practices in PES hydrosocial territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Jichuan Sheng & Xiao Han, 2023. "Constructing payments for ecosystem services hydrosocial territories through assemblage practices: China’s Xin’an river basin eco-compensation pilot," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 375-391, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:2:p:375-391
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544221137442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544221137442
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544221137442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Carlo Rodríguez-de-Francisco & Rutgerd Boelens, 2016. "PES hydrosocial territories: de-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 140-156, January.
    2. Huijie Wang & Zhanfeng Dong & Yuan Xu & Chazhong Ge, 2016. "Eco-compensation for watershed services in China," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 271-289, March.
    3. Paul Hoogendam, 2019. "Hydrosocial territories in the context of diverse and changing ruralities: the case of Cochabamba’s drinking water provision over time," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 129-147, February.
    4. Jeroen Vos & Leonith Hinojosa, 2016. "Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 37-53, January.
    5. Gerardo Damonte & Rutgerd Boelens, 2019. "Hydrosocial territories, agro-export and water scarcity: capitalist territorial transformations and water governance in Peru’s coastal valleys," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 206-223, February.
    6. Wilshusen, Peter R., 2019. "Environmental governance in motion: Practices of assemblage and the political performativity of economistic conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Michael Webber & Xiao Han, 2017. "Corporations, Governments, and Socioenvironmental Policy in China: China's Water Machine as Assemblage," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1444-1460, November.
    8. Van Hecken, Gert & Bastiaensen, Johan & Vásquez, William F., 2012. "The viability of local payments for watershed services: Empirical evidence from Matiguás, Nicaragua," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 169-176.
    9. Engel, Stefanie & Pagiola, Stefano & Wunder, Sven, 2008. "Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 663-674, May.
    10. Peter Lindner, 2018. "Creativity Policy: Conserving Neoliberalism’s Other in a Market Assemblage?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(2), pages 97-117, March.
    11. Miriam Seemann, 2016. "Inclusive recognition politics and the struggle over hydrosocial territories in two Bolivian highland communities," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 157-172, January.
    12. Sonja Bleeker & Jeroen Vos, 2019. "Payment for ecosystem services in Lima’s watersheds: power and imaginaries in an urban-rural hydrosocial territory," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 224-242, February.
    13. Tom Baker & Ian R. Cook & Eugene McCann & Cristina Temenos & Kevin Ward, 2016. "Policies on the Move: The Transatlantic Travels of Tax Increment Financing," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(2), pages 459-469, March.
    14. Rutgerd Boelens & Jaime Hoogesteger & Erik Swyngedouw & Jeroen Vos & Philippus Wester, 2016. "Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Farrell, Katharine N., 2014. "Intellectual mercantilism and franchise equity: A critical study of the ecological political economy of international payments for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 137-146.
    16. Jamie Peck, 2002. "Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 331-360, July.
    17. Jaime Hoogesteger & Rutgerd Boelens & Michiel Baud, 2016. "Territorial pluralism: water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 91-106, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossana Manosalvas & Jaime Hoogesteger & Rutgerd Boelens, 2023. "Imaginaries of place in territorialization processes: Transforming the Oyacachi páramos through nature conservation and water transfers in the Ecuadorian highlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 1010-1028, August.
    2. Sheng, Jichuan & Han, Xiao, 2022. "Practicing policy mobility of payment for ecosystem services through assemblage and performativity: Lessons from China's Xin'an River Basin Eco-compensation Pilot," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Sarah Rogers & Mark Wang, 2020. "Producing a Chinese hydrosocial territory: A river of clean water flows north from Danjiangkou," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(7-8), pages 1308-1327, November.
    4. Sheng, Jichuan & Webber, Michael, 2017. "Incentive-compatible payments for watershed services along the Eastern Route of China’s South-North Water Transfer Project," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 213-226.
    5. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Wenge & Han, Xiao, 2020. "China’s PES-like horizontal eco-compensation program: Combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Claudio Rafael Mariano Baigún & Priscilla Gail Minotti, 2021. "Conserving the Paraguay-Paraná Fluvial Corridor in the XXI Century: Conflicts, Threats, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Aguilar-Gómez, Carlos R. & Arteaga-Reyes, Tizbe T. & Gómez-Demetrio, William & Ávila-Akerberg, Víctor D. & Pérez-Campuzano, Enrique, 2020. "Differentiated payments for environmental services: A review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    8. Hao Wang & Sander Meijerink & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Michael Kaplowitz & Frank Lupi & Oscar Arreola, 2012. "Local Markets for Payments for Environmental Services: Can Small Rural Communities Self-Finance Watershed Protection?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3689-3704, October.
    10. Martin-Ortega, Julia & Waylen, Kerry A., 2018. "PES What a Mess? An Analysis of the Position of Environmental Professionals in the Conceptual Debate on Payments for Ecosystem Services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 218-237.
    11. Bremer, Leah L. & Farley, Kathleen A. & Lopez-Carr, David & Romero, José, 2014. "Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for ‘win–win’?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 148-165.
    12. Long, Kaisheng & Omrani, Hichem & Pijanowski, Bryan C., 2020. "Impact of local payments for ecosystem services on land use in a developed area of China: A qualitative analysis based on an integrated conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Sheng, Jichuan & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Linking water markets with payments for watershed services: the eastern route of China's South-North Water Transfer Project," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    14. Martin-Ortega, Julia & Dekker, Thijs & Ojea, Elena & Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea, 2019. "Dissecting price setting efficiency in Payments for Ecosystem Services: A meta-analysis of payments for watershed services in Latin America," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Lliso, Bosco & Pascual, Unai & Engel, Stefanie & Mariel, Petr, 2020. "Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Van Hecken, Gert & Bastiaensen, Johan & Windey, Catherine, 2015. "Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-125.
    17. Chunci Chen & Guizhen He & Yonglong Lu, 2022. "Payments for Watershed Ecosystem Services in the Eyes of the Public, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Yuri Botelho Salmona & Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi & David Lewis Skole & João Flávio Andrade Silva & Osmar de Araújo Coelho Filho & Marcos Antonio Pedlowski & James Matos Sampaio & Leidi Caho, 2023. "A Worrying Future for River Flows in the Brazilian Cerrado Provoked by Land Use and Climate Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    19. Dupuits, Emilie & Baud, Michiel & Boelens, Rutgerd & de Castro, Fabio & Hogenboom, Barbara, 2020. "Scaling up but losing out? Water commons' dilemmas between transnational movements and grassroots struggles in Latin America," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:2:p:375-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.