IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v41y2009i5p1090-1108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redevelopment, Displacement, Housing Conditions, and Residential Satisfaction: A Study of Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Si-Ming Li

    (Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China)

  • Yu-Ling Song

    (Department of Geography, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

Chinese cities are undergoing massive transformation. One after another, inner-city neighbourhoods of pre-1949 origin and work-unit compounds built in the socialist period are being torn apart, giving way to glossy office towers and luxurious condominiums. Millions of people have been uprooted and forced to be relocated. Mass media and research based on case studies generally convey a message of widespread grievance among the displaced residents. Based on a survey of 1200 households conducted in Shanghai in 2006, the present study provides a systematic account of the profiles of the displaced residents, juxtaposed against other resident groups of the city. The major conclusion is that, irrespective of all the criticisms concerning unregulated demolitions and forced evictions, the housing conditions of displaced residents are somewhat better than those of other Shanghai residents, both objectively and in terms of subjective evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Si-Ming Li & Yu-Ling Song, 2009. "Redevelopment, Displacement, Housing Conditions, and Residential Satisfaction: A Study of Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1090-1108, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:5:p:1090-1108
    DOI: 10.1068/a4168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a4168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rod Mccrea & Robert Stimson & John Western, 2005. "Testing a Moderated Model of Satisfaction with Urban Living using Data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 121-152, June.
    2. Donggen Wang & Si-Ming Li, 2004. "Housing Preferences in a Transitional Housing System: The Case of Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 69-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilyes Bougouffa & Ariva Sugandi Permana, 2018. "A Study on the Linkages between Residential Satisfaction and the Overall Quality of Life in Bandar Tun Razak Area of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 991-1013, December.
    2. Donggen Wang & Fenglong Wang, 2016. "Contributions of the Usage and Affective Experience of the Residential Environment to Residential Satisfaction," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 42-60, January.
    3. Guan, Jinping & Xu, Chengzhong, 2018. "Are relocatees different from others? Relocatee’s travel mode choice and travel equity analysis in large-scale residential areas on the periphery of megacity Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 162-173.
    4. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2014. "Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1286-1303, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donggen Wang & Jiukun Li & Harry Timmermans, 2004. "Measuring Bifurcation Points in Choice Behavior: Principles and Illustration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(6), pages 1125-1138, June.
    2. Cecilia Wong & Wei Zheng & Miao Qiao, 2020. "Urban expansion and neighbourhood commuting patterns in the Beijing metropolitan region: A multilevel analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2773-2793, October.
    3. Xiangming Chen & Jiaming Sun, 2007. "Untangling a Global–Local Nexus: Sorting Out Residential Sorting in Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(10), pages 2324-2345, October.
    4. Suhong Zhou & Zhidong Wu & Luping Cheng, 2013. "The Impact of Spatial Mismatch on Residents in Low-income Housing Neighbourhoods: A Study of the Guangzhou Metropolis, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1817-1835, July.
    5. Daskalopoulou, Irene & Karakitsiou, Athanasia & Malliou, Christina, 2022. "Fear of crime and Roma integration," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 344-360.
    6. Rohayu Ab Majid & Rosli Said, 2015. "Public Preferences towards Residential Placement in a Township Area: Case Study of Malaysia," LARES lares_2015_1196-1386-1-rv, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    7. Aline Chiabai & Stephen Platt & Wadim Strielkowski, 2014. "Eliciting Users' Preferences for Cultural Heritage and Tourism-Related E-Services: A Tale of Three European Cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 263-277, April.
    8. repec:cep:sticas:/130 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hong Hu & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer, 2015. "Planning Support in Estimating Green Housing Opportunities for Different Socioeconomic Groups in Nanjing, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(2), pages 316-337, April.
    10. Shin, Hyun Bang, 2008. "Driven to swim with the tide?: urban redevelopment and community participation in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6194, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Marois, Guillaume & Lord, Sébastien & Morency, Catherine, 2019. "A mixed logit model analysis of residential choices of the young-elderly in the Montreal metropolitan area," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-149.
    12. Meimei Wang & Yongchun Yang & Mengqin Liu & Huailiang Yu, 2021. "Intergenerational Factors Influencing Household Cohabitation in Urban China: Chengdu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Yang Hu & Rory Coulter, 2017. "Living space and psychological well-being in urban China: Differentiated relationships across socio-economic gradients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 911-929, April.
    14. Li, Chunjiang & Zhang, Yan & Chai, Yanwei, 2021. "Do spatial factors outweigh institutional factors? Changes in influencing factors of home-work separation from 2007 to 2017 in Beijing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Caplan, Arthur J. & Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. & Toll, Kristopher, 2021. "Measuring heterogeneous preferences for residential amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Hyun Bang Shin, 2008. "Driven to swim with the tide? Urban redevelopment and community participation in China," CASE Papers case130, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    17. Ambrey, Christopher L. & Fleming, Christopher M. & Chan, Andrew Yiu-Chung, 2014. "Estimating the cost of air pollution in South East Queensland: An application of the life satisfaction non-market valuation approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 172-181.
    18. Donggen Wang & Fenglong Wang, 2016. "Contributions of the Usage and Affective Experience of the Residential Environment to Residential Satisfaction," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 42-60, January.
    19. Hong Hu & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer, 2014. "The willingness to pay for green apartments: The case of Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(16), pages 3459-3478, December.
    20. Anna Alberini & Alberto Longo & Patrizia Riganti, 2006. "Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale," Working Papers 2006.137, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    21. Alberini, Anna & Longo, Alberto & Riganti, Patrizia, 2006. "Using Surveys to Compare the Public's and Decision-makers' Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale," Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation Working Papers 12221, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:5:p:1090-1108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.