IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v36y2004i2p347-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replication/Prediction Problems in the Journey to Work

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Jörnsten

    (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway)

  • Inge Thorsen

    (Stord/Haugesund College, Bjørnsonsgate 45, 5528 Haugesund, Norway)

  • Jan Ubøe

    (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

In this paper we will consider gravity models for journeys to work. In applications of the theory it is sometimes assumed that the parameters in such models are fixed. We will provide examples to show that this is not always a reasonable assumption, for instance, when the model is applied to predict how changes in the road transportation network influence commuting flows. Models where the parameters are subject to change usually comply with C -efficiency and random utility theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Jörnsten & Inge Thorsen & Jan Ubøe, 2004. "Replication/Prediction Problems in the Journey to Work," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 347-364, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:2:p:347-364
    DOI: 10.1068/a36122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a36122
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a36122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T J Fik & G F Mulligan, 1990. "Spatial Flows and Competing Central Places: Towards a General Theory of Hierarchical Interaction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 22(4), pages 527-549, April.
    2. Pasquale A. Pellegrini & A. Stewart Fotheringham & Ge Lin, 1997. "An Empirical Evaluation Of Parameter Sensitivity To Choice Set Definition In Shopping Destination Choice Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 257-284, April.
    3. Jens P Gitlesen & Inge Thorsen, 2000. "A Competing Destinations Approach to Modeling Commuting Flows: A Theoretical Interpretation and An Empirical Application of the Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(11), pages 2057-2074, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jens P Gitlesen & Inge Thorsen, 2000. "A Competing Destinations Approach to Modeling Commuting Flows: A Theoretical Interpretation and An Empirical Application of the Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(11), pages 2057-2074, November.
    3. Jens Petter Gitlesen & Inge Thorsen & Jan Ubøe, 2004. "Misspecifications in modelling journeys to work," ERSA conference papers ersa04p420, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Jan Ubøe, 2004. "Aggregation of Gravity Models for Journeys to Work," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(4), pages 715-729, April.
    5. Gitlesen, Jens Petter & Thorsen, Inge & Ubøe, Jan, 2004. "Misspecifications due to aggregation of data in models for journeys-to-work," Discussion Papers 2004/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    6. L Sanders & D Pumain & H Mathian & F Guérin-Pace & S Bura, 1997. "SIMPOP: A Multiagent System for the Study of Urbanism," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(2), pages 287-305, April.
    7. Stamatis Kalogirou, 2012. "Testing local versions of correlation coefficients," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(1), pages 45-61, March.
    8. Azam Azad Gholami & Inge Thorsen & Jan Ubøe, 2024. "An Agent-based Approach to Study Spatial Structure Effects on Estimated Distance Deterrence in Commuting," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 621-653, September.
    9. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Warehouse location choice: A case study in Los Angeles, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Gordon Mulligan & Mark Partridge & John Carruthers, 2012. "Central place theory and its reemergence in regional science," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(2), pages 405-431, April.
    11. Huang, Arthur & Levinson, David, 2017. "A model of two-destination choice in trip chains with GPS data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 51-62.
    12. McArthur, David Philip & Kleppe, Gisle & Thorsen, Inge & Ubøe, Jan, 2011. "The spatial transferability of parameters in a gravity model of commuting flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 596-605.
    13. Stamatis Kalogirou, 2011. "Testing local versions of correlation coefficients," ERSA conference papers ersa10p529, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Audrey Bossuyt & Laurence Broze & Victor Ginsburgh, 2001. "On invisible trade relations between Mesopotamian cities during the third millennium B.C," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/99274, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. David Plane & Gordon Mulligan, 1997. "Measuring spatial focusing in a migration system," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 34(2), pages 251-262, May.
    16. Glenn, Paul & Thorsen, Inge & Ubøe, Jan, 2004. "Wage payoffs and distance deterrence in the journey to work," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 853-867, November.
    17. Edgar Morgenroth, 2002. "Commuting in Ireland: An Analysis of Inter-County Commuting Flows," Papers WP144, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    18. V I Shvetsov & Yu A Dubov, 1997. "Expected Distributions in the Intervening Opportunities Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(7), pages 1229-1241, July.
    19. Berjisian, Elmira & Habibian, Meeghat, 2019. "Developing a pedestrian destination choice model using the stratified importance sampling method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-47.
    20. Lenormand, Maxime & Bassolas, Aleix & Ramasco, José J., 2016. "Systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 158-169.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:2:p:347-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.