IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v9y1998i3p297-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Supply Measures to Reduce Regional Carbon Intensity: Opportunities and Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • D. Mcevoy
  • D.C. Gibbs
  • J.W.S. Longhurst

Abstract

The perceived threat of 'enhanced' global warming has become a widespread public concern since the late 1980s, with the balance of informed opinion urging world-wide collaboration on combating the causes of global warming. The increasingly globalised status of the majority of late twentieth century economies ensures that remedial action will ultimately require a degree of international cooperation. Although the formulation of environmentally friendly energy policies, including carbon reduction strategies, can be framed at international and national levels, recent trends are for CO 2 reduction measures to be instigated by regional, or local, authorities.This paper focuses on the city-region of Greater Manchester, U.K., and reviews both existing and potential energy supply options for reducing regional CO 2 emissions, highlighting the benefits and obstacles facing carbon reduction measures implemented at a 'local' scale 1 . Mitigation action at this level is considered desirable as remedial measures have most chance of success when accompanied by the supportive involvement of local people.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Mcevoy & D.C. Gibbs & J.W.S. Longhurst, 1998. "Energy Supply Measures to Reduce Regional Carbon Intensity: Opportunities and Constraints," Energy & Environment, , vol. 9(3), pages 297-319, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:9:y:1998:i:3:p:297-319
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9800900305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9800900305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9800900305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burtraw, Dallas & Toman, Michael, 1997. "The Benefits of Reduced Air Pollutants in the U.S. from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-98-01-rev, Resources for the Future.
    2. Johansson, TB & Williams, RH & Ishitani, H & Edmonds, James A, 1996. "Options for reducing CO2 emissions from the energy supply sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(10-11), pages 985-1003.
    3. Gerald Manners, 1997. "Gas Market Liberalization in Britain: Some Geographical Observations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 295-309.
    4. Babus'Haq, R.F. & Probert, S.D., 1994. "Combined heat-and-power market-penetration in the UK: Problems and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 315-334.
    5. Grubb, Michael, 1997. "Technologies, energy systems and the timing of CO2 emissions abatement : An overview of economic issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 159-172, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. McEvoy & D.C. Gibbs & J.W.S. Longhurst, 2000. "The employment implications of a low-carbon economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 27-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Toman, 1998. "Research Frontiers in the Economics of Climate Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 603-621, April.
    2. Toman, Michael & Morgenstern, Richard & Anderson, John, 1998. "The Economics of "When" Flexibility in the Design of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-99-38-rev, Resources for the Future.
    3. A. Myrick Freeman III, 2000. "The Valuation of Environmental Health Damages in Developing Countries: Some Observations," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper sp200011t1, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Nov 2000.
    4. Renaud Crassous & Jean Charles Hourcade & Olivier Sassi, 2006. "Endogenous structural change and climate targets," Post-Print halshs-00009335, HAL.
    5. Babus'Haq, R. F. & Olsen, H. & Probert, S. D., 1996. "Feasibility of using an integrated small-scale CHP unit plus desiccant wheel in a leisure complex," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1-2), pages 179-192.
    6. Samuel Carrara & Giacomo Marangoni, 2013. "Non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation modeling with marginal abatement cost curv es: technical change, emission scenarios and policy costs," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 91-124.
    7. Valentina Bosetti & Laurent Gilotte, 2005. "Carbon Capture and Sequestration: How Much Does this Uncertain Option Affect Near-Term Policy Choices?," Working Papers 2005.86, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Rasmussen, Tobias N., 2001. "CO2 abatement policy with learning-by-doing in renewable energy," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 297-325, October.
    10. Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem & Waisman, Henri & Guivarch, Céline & Hourcade, Jean-Charles, 2012. "Mitigation costs in second-best economies: time profile of emission reductions and sequencing of accompanying measures," Conference papers 332206, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Dunstan, D. & Probert, D., 2002. "Raising the effectiveness of electricity generation (per unit of fossil-fuel combusted) by less conventional means," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 103-138, October.
    12. Pizer, William, 1997. "Prices vs. Quantities Revisited: The Case of Climate Change," RFF Working Paper Series dp-98-02, Resources for the Future.
    13. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    14. Sébastien Dessus & David O'Connor, 2003. "Climate Policy without Tears CGE-Based Ancillary Benefits Estimates for Chile," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(3), pages 287-317, July.
    15. Lennox, James A. & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2017. "Directed technical change with capital-embodied technologies: Implications for climate policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 400-409.
    16. Christopher Groves & Max Munday & Natalia Yakovleva, 2013. "Fighting the Pipe: Neoliberal Governance and Barriers to Effective Community Participation in Energy Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 340-356, April.
    17. Ibenholt, Karin, 2002. "Explaining learning curves for wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(13), pages 1181-1189, October.
    18. Sylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska & Karolina Sobieraj & Jacek A. Koziel & Jerzy Bieniek & Andrzej Białowiec, 2020. "Kinetics of Biotic and Abiotic CO Production during the Initial Phase of Biowaste Composting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Chester, D. & Lynch, C. & Szerszynski, B. & Mercure, J.-F. & Jarvis, A., 2024. "Heterogeneous capital stocks and economic inertia in the US economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Lawrence H. Goulder & Koshy Mathai, 1998. "Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change," NBER Working Papers 6494, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:9:y:1998:i:3:p:297-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.